Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Rajbir Singh Chauhan & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to grant Nonfunctional Upgradation benefits to petitioners in accordance with the binding Sushil Kumar judgment, dismissing administrative delay as a ground for denial.
Yogesh Parnami (HUF) v. SK Mittal
The Delhi High Court held that trial courts must not appoint Local Commissioners for recording evidence as a routine and cannot impose related costs on parties without consent, especially when the respondent is ex-parte, setting aside such orders in a recovery suit.
Amit Kumar Verma & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioners' antecedent verification within a specified time to prevent prejudice from delay, without expressing opinion on merits.
Vishnu Bhatt & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Standing Screening Committee to expeditiously verify and decide on the petitioners' antecedents within a fixed timeframe to prevent prejudice in their CISF appointment process.
Ashvani Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of a departmental transfer order ignoring the petitioner’s medical condition and stayed its implementation pending a speaking order.
Kailash Chand Gurjar and Ors v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners in the promotion zone to be considered for deployment abroad if they waive promotion rights and PCC/PPC attendance claims during deployment.
P Lakshmi and Ors. v. M/s Jubilant Foodworks Ltd and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award and held that arbitration invoked after ripening of cause of action and denial of liability is not barred by limitation.
Rakesh Kumar Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging dismissal from Railway Protection Force service due to inordinate and unexplained delay of over 13 years, emphasizing that delay and laches bar relief under Article 226.
Maan Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful termination of a CISF probationer on medical grounds after multiple Medical Boards declared him unfit to complete Basic Training.
Jai Prakash v. Director General Central Industry Security Force & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging compulsory retirement of a CISF constable due to inordinate delay and latches in filing appeals, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines in disciplinary matters.
Abdul Sattar v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that refund of seized gold must be calculated based on tariff value on the date of transfer to SPMCIL, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for additional customs duty refund.
Venkateshwar Hospital & Anr. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR against a doctor and hospital for medical negligence, holding that prima facie material including expert opinion justified investigation and trial.
OZONE SPA PVT LTD v. MR ARVIND & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Ozone Spa Pvt Ltd, restraining defendants from using deceptively similar marks and awarding damages for trademark and copyright infringement.
Gaurav Vats and Others v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as the petitioners' grievance was fully addressed, rendering the petition infructuous.
Mantosh Kumar v. Bhupinder Singh
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rash and negligent driving case due to failure of prosecution to prove identity and reliability of evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
M/S JK TYRE AND INDUSTRIES LTD v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
The Delhi High Court condoned the delay in filing an appeal against a delayed and allegedly illegal property tax assessment order, emphasizing a justice-oriented approach over procedural technicalities.
Perfect Diesel Sales and Service & Anr. v. Power HF India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the arbitrator's refusal to appoint an expert and frame additional issues, holding that limited judicial interference applies to interlocutory orders under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act.
Rajan Puri v. Mohd Rehan
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner an extension to vacate tenanted premises until August 2027 on payment of monthly occupation charges, staying the eviction order subject to compliance with court-ordered undertakings.
Rajan Puri and Anr. v. Rehana Salim
The Delhi High Court granted an extension to the petitioners to vacate tenanted premises until August 2027 on payment of monthly occupation charges and filing of an undertaking, staying the eviction order subject to compliance.
Rojalini Parida v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that mandatory attendance requirements for law students prescribed by the Bar Council of India cannot be relaxed under writ jurisdiction absent mala fide or perversity, dismissing petitions seeking to appear in exams despite short attendance.