Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Ved Prakash Thakur v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal to stay auction proceedings and recognized the extended payment period under the DDA brochure, directing deposit of the balance amount with interest pending final adjudication.
Religare Finvest Limited v. Lakshmi Vilas Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the State Bank of India's application for impleadment as a necessary party defendant in a suit challenging unauthorized liquidation of hypothecated fixed deposits, emphasizing the court's discretion under Order I Rule 10 CPC to ensure effective adjudication.
Bir Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition alleging violation of parking restrictions by directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation for administrative disposal, emphasizing procedural fairness and exhaustion of remedies.
M/S AIMS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Unlocking or activating mobile phones after manufacture constitutes 'taken into use' under customs law, disqualifying exporters from claiming duty drawback under Section 75 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Union of India v. M/S APCOTEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED
The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions challenging CESTAT orders on Anti-Dumping Duty Office Memorandums as infructuous after domestic industries withdrew claims, leaving the jurisdictional issue open.
Shivam Pandey v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges, holding that mere breach of promise to marry without mala fide intention does not vitiate consent under Section 375 IPC.
Fazrudeen and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-initiation within the prescribed period, directing restoration of possession and rectification of records, emphasizing compliance with final Supreme Court orders despite pending curative petitions.
FIITJEE Ltd. v. Madhulika Singh
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference under Article 227 in arbitral orders is limited to exceptional cases of perversity and dismissed the petition challenging the Arbitrator's refusal to exclude certain witnesses.
Jyotish Kumar Misra and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider writ petitions as representations for grant of notional pay scale benefits within twelve weeks, without expressing opinion on merits.
Vikram Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging Air Force service policy, holding that such service matters fall exclusively within the Armed Forces Tribunal's jurisdiction.
Anwar Kamal v. Subhan Ahmed
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant, holding that the landlord proved bona fide need and better title, and the tenant failed to raise triable issues for leave to defend.
Sachin Nagpal v. Gopal Krishan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition challenging the dismissal of leave to defend in an eviction case, affirming the landlord's bona fide need and limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Amarchand v. Rakesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide requirement, rejecting the tenant's claim of alternate accommodation and limiting the scope of revisionary jurisdiction.
Shri Anil Arvind Bhai Vaiwala v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 20% deposit condition for suspension of sentence under Section 138 NI Act is not absolute and appellate courts must consider exceptions even if not specifically pleaded.
Shri Anil Arvind Bhai Vaiwala v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 20% deposit condition for suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC in Section 138 NI Act appeals is not absolute and appellate courts must consider exceptions even if not specifically pleaded.
Shri Anil Arvind Bhai Vaiwala v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 20% deposit condition for suspension of sentence under Section 138 NI Act is not absolute and appellate courts must consider exceptions based on the appellant’s circumstances, setting aside orders that failed to do so.
STCI Finance Ltd v. MS Aviom India Housing Finance Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction protecting hypothecated receivables by directing defendants to maintain a separate account with a minimum balance, balancing plaintiff's interest and defendants' business operations.
Jamal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child based on credible sole testimony and forensic evidence, modifying the sentence to life imprisonment as per the law at the time of the offence.
Mr. Ankit Kumar v. M/S ALKARMA
The Delhi High Court held that quashing of a Show Cause Notice on valuation of free materials does not bar adjudication of other demands raised in the same notice, allowing the Department to proceed on merits excluding free materials value.
Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking preponement of hearing as an abuse of process, emphasizing counsel's responsibility in legal aid matters.