Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

STCI Finance Ltd v. MS Aviom India Housing Finance Private Limited & Ors.

12 Feb 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:1031

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction protecting hypothecated receivables by directing defendants to maintain a separate account with a minimum balance, balancing plaintiff's interest and defendants' business operations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction hypothecation receivables loan default

Jamal v. State of NCT of Delhi

12 Feb 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:981-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child based on credible sole testimony and forensic evidence, modifying the sentence to life imprisonment as per the law at the time of the offence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act aggravated penetrative sexual assault child victim testimony sole testimony conviction

Mr. Ankit Kumar v. M/S ALKARMA

12 Feb 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:951-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that quashing of a Show Cause Notice on valuation of free materials does not bar adjudication of other demands raised in the same notice, allowing the Department to proceed on merits excluding free materials value.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Service Tax Valuation Free Materials

Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

12 Feb 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:893-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking preponement of hearing as an abuse of process, emphasizing counsel's responsibility in legal aid matters.

other petition_dismissed abuse of process legal aid preponement of hearing exemplary costs

Anand Rav v. State Bank of India

12 Feb 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:903

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of a contract employee for failure to complete mandatory certifications communicated as essential job requirements.

labor petition_dismissed Article 226 termination of contract mandatory certification on-the-job training

Shammi @ Shanni v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

12 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:912
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the accused in a commercial heroin seizure case, holding that stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met and procedural irregularities were matters for trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail under NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act Section 42 NDPS Act compliance Section 50 NDPS Act procedure

M/S. LEVITATE MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. v. M/S. STANDARD CHARTED BANK

12 Feb 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:908
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The court clarified that under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, a plaintiff must establish reasonable cause to file additional documents not disclosed with the plaint, emphasizing strict procedural compliance for speedy commercial dispute resolution.

civil other Significant Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015 reasonable cause disclosure of documents

Rajiv Sharma v. The Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi

12 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:896

The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition due to the petitioner's non-compliance with Court directions and respondents' compliance with orders.

civil petition_dismissed contempt petition non-compliance affidavit Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Deepali Aggarwal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

12 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:892

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition challenging demolition orders, holding that pending appeals before the Appellate Tribunal preclude adjudication of the contempt matter.

administrative petition_dismissed contempt petition demolition orders Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal

Sh. Tara Chand v. The Chairman, Delhi Development Authority and Another

12 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:891

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation with DDA regarding flat allotment issues and ordered DDA to dispose of it expeditiously without adjudicating on merits.

administrative other Prime Minister Awas Yojna Delhi Development Authority flat allotment Covid-19 pandemic

Vineet Tiwari v. Harinder Pal Singh Chawla

12 Feb 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that objections under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC by judgment debtors or transferees pendente lite during execution of a Section 6 Specific Relief Act decree are not maintainable or appealable, dismissing the appeals and upholding the decree holder's right to possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI CPC Execution proceedings Transferee pendente lite Section 6 Specific Relief Act

Achal Kumar Jindal v. Evaan Holdings Private Limited & Ors.

12 Feb 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2025:DHC:865-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the writ petition directing RBI to act against mismanagement in an NBFC, affirming the Court's jurisdiction to issue mandamus for failure of statutory duty despite pending NCLT proceedings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant writ petition maintainability Reserve Bank of India Act mandamus failure to exercise statutory power

Amardeep Singh v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

12 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:873
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a rape and miscarriage case, holding that consent and inducement issues are to be decided at trial and that bail is appropriate after investigation completion with conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail rape consent false promise of marriage

Jinesh Jain v. Amit Jain & Ors.

12 Feb 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 582
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that stamp duty is not payable on a court decree affirming pre-existing ownership rights and allowed refund of stamp duty paid on such decree.

civil petition_allowed Significant stamp duty court decree registration family settlement

Satya Prakash Bagla v. Evaan Holdings Pvt Ltd & Ors.

12 Feb 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2025:DHC:864-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of a writ petition directing RBI to exercise its statutory powers against an NBFC's mismanagement, dismissing the appeal challenging interim directions passed at the maintainability stage.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant writ petition Article 226 Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 mandamus

Johnson Ka v. Evaan Holdings Pvt Ltd & Ors.

12 Feb 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2025:DHC:863-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of a writ petition directing RBI to exercise its supervisory powers over an NBFC, dismissing the appeal challenging interim directions issued against the company's management.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant writ petition maintainability Article 226 Reserve Bank of India Act mandamus

Kan Damian Kouassi v. State of NCT of Delhi

12 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:874
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing the right to liberty and delay in trial despite stringent statutory bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act, 1985 Section 37 NDPS Act Section 50 NDPS Act bail

PUMA SE v. MAHESH KUMAR

12 Feb 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:1552

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of PUMA SE, holding the defendant liable for trademark infringement and counterfeiting of well-known marks, awarding injunctions, damages, and costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement well-known trademark counterfeiting passing off

Bhuwan Chandra Kandpal and Ors v. Union of India and Ors

12 Feb 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1761-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to grant Nonfunctional Upgradation benefits to petitioners in accordance with a binding judgment, rejecting administrative delay as a ground for denial.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Nonfunctional Upgradation Grade Pay Rs. 5400 Writ Petition Implementation of Judgment

M/S SWIKRITI TRAVELS v. M/S MINI POCKET OPC PVT. LTD.

12 Feb 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2737-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that courts may impose reasonable conditions when setting aside ex parte decrees under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, but directing deposit of the entire decretal amount without specific reasons is excessive and remanded the matter for reconsideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order IX Rule 13 CPC ex parte decree setting aside ex parte decree deposit of decretal amount