Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
Ranjana Sood v. NDMC
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging ongoing departmental enquiry proceedings as premature, holding that such proceedings cannot be stayed before conclusion absent jurisdictional defects.
Usman Ali v. The Deputy Director (F&A) Export Promotion Council
The Delhi High Court held that temporary open-ended appointments are protected under section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act and awarded compensation for illegal retrenchment without reinstatement.
Gangnishan Gujiyta v. DDA
The Delhi High Court held that ownership of residential property less than 65 sq. meters does not disqualify a person from allotment under the Rohini Residential Scheme and quashed the cancellation of the petitioner’s allotment by DDA.
Pushpender Singh v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeals for specific performance, holding that no substantial question of law arose and concurrent factual findings were rightly upheld.
Rohit v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of causing injuries with weapons, subject to bond and cooperation with investigation.
Pushpa H. Moorjani v. Kewal
The Delhi High Court set aside the order closing the tenant's evidence in eviction proceedings due to her serious medical condition and granted a final opportunity to lead evidence in the interest of justice.
CIT v. Global Vantedge Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the ITAT does not err in confirming the CIT (Appeals) findings without independent reasons if it fully agrees with them and no contrary material is presented.
Sharad Kapoor v. Nitishree Infrastructure Ltd.
The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions based on a binding settlement agreement reached through mediation, allowing revival if post-dated cheques are dishonoured.
Union of India & Ors v. Kamal Kumar
The Delhi High Court condoned a 139-day delay in filing government appeals after finding sufficient bona fide cause and reasonable diligence in processing the matter within the limitation period.
Binder v. Veena & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's regular second appeal, holding that whether a terrace forms part of tenanted premises is a question of fact, and the appellant failed to prove tenancy rights over the tin shed occupied by respondent No.1.
Union of India & Ors v. Kamal Kumar
The Delhi High Court condoned a 139-day delay in filing government appeals against SAFEMA orders, holding that bona fide procedural delays and due diligence justify condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Swatantar Devi & Anr. v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The High Court held that petitioners alleging police inaction must first exhaust statutory remedies under Sections 154(3), 156(3), and 200 CrPC before seeking writ relief, and police must provide protection to life and liberty.
Arvind Rathi v. KS Mehra Commissioner MCD and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging disobedience of a construction-related order as not pressed after the MCD ceased involvement and no ongoing construction was found.
Sanjiv Kumar v. Satish Chand Khandelwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to the appellants to pursue other legal remedies subject to respondents' objections.
Shankar Pandey v. M/S Aditya Trading Company
The appellant withdrew the civil appeal before the Delhi High Court, leading to its disposal as withdrawn and dismissal of related miscellaneous applications.
Rockwell Palstic P. Ltd. & Ors. v. Arinits Sales Corporation
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of multiple criminal revision petitions with liberty to raise the same contentions before the trial court at the final hearing stage.
Mahipal Singh v. Union of India & Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator due to absence of a valid arbitration agreement and non-fulfillment of contractual conditions by the petitioner.
Shiv Kumar Garg v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners who voluntarily paid Rs. 5 lakhs to the complainant and undertook to cooperate with the investigation, subject to furnishing bonds and sureties.
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited v. Vijay Saini
The Delhi High Court held that the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum lacks jurisdiction to pass directions in theft of electricity cases beyond specified statutory provisions and set aside its order following an amicable settlement.
Hindustan Prefab Ltd v. Mittal Estate Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed condonation of delay applications and appeals filed by a public sector enterprise, holding that no special limitation applies to government entities and unexplained delay in arbitration appeals cannot be condoned.