Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
National Highways Authority of India v. Sh. Mukul Saxena
The Delhi High Court held that permanent absorption of deputation employees requires explicit consent from the Parent Department and quashed the tribunal's direction permitting deemed no objection.
Ganga Ram & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a quarrel after the parties amicably settled their dispute, applying the principle that criminal proceedings may be quashed in non-compoundable offences when continuation is futile and justice demands peace.
Rakesh v. UOI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court condoned a 1625-day delay in filing an appeal and remanded the land acquisition matter for fresh determination of the appellant's share and correction of the Khasra number.
Suresh Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the six-month rigorous imprisonment sentence for theft under Sections 379 read with 34 IPC, relying on credible evidence and recovery of stolen goods.
Tej Singh v. UOI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court condoned a 1621-day delay in filing an appeal due to counsel's failure and financial hardship, and remanded the land acquisition dispute for fresh determination of the appellant's share.
Mukesh v. UOI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court condoned a 1625-day delay and remanded a land acquisition appeal for fresh determination of the appellant's share and correct land particulars under Sections 30-31 of the Land Acquisition Act.
P.D. Goel and Sons v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing an appeal and allowed compensation for land acquisition in Village Mundka based on a prior precedent fixing fair market value.
Dharam Singh & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from a quarrel after the parties amicably settled their dispute through mediation, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would be unjust and an abuse of process.
Sahil Bansal v. Vasudha
The Delhi High Court held that non-consummation under Section 12(1)(a) includes mental impotence and annulled a marriage as void ab initio since the respondent was not a Hindu, allowing the appeal.
Capt. Vijender Singh Chauhan v. Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition against Parsvnath Developers Ltd., holding that a disputed debt claim does not warrant winding up under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956.
World Phone India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. WPI Group Inc., USA
The Delhi High Court held that an affirmative vote clause in a shareholder agreement not incorporated into the Articles of Association is not binding on a private company, but procedural fairness in Board meetings must be observed, partially setting aside the CLB order invalidating a Board meeting.
Krishna Kumar; Subhash Chandra Gupta; Dharmendra Kr. Lila v. Registrar of Companies
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of a complaint under Sections 63 and 628 of the Companies Act, holding that the magistrate was justified in taking cognizance based on the prospectus signed by the petitioners and that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC should be exercised sparingly.
Roshanlal Vohra & Sons v. MCD & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint a substitute arbitrator under Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the original arbitrator expressed inability to act.
Sh. Jeet Ram v. OC, CWG Delhi 2010 and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of a temporary employee appointed for the Commonwealth Games, holding that such termination was lawful and regular employment cannot be granted without following the prescribed recruitment process.
D.C. Tiwari & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the government's unilateral amendment of promotion criteria for ITBPF personnel, ruling no vested right was impaired and the changes were not arbitrary.
M.S. Ginti v. Jawahar Lal Nehru University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner, a non-academic Curator, is not entitled to the higher pay scale reserved for academic staff under UGC guidelines following the Fifth Pay Commission.
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMA LTD. v. HIDUSTAN MEDIBIOTIC
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against the defendant for trademark and copyright infringement by adopting deceptively similar trademark and packaging for veterinary pharmaceutical products.
Lalit Kumar v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the reversion of a probationary officer to substantive cadre due to unsatisfactory performance, emphasizing employer discretion and barring relief on grounds of delay.
Union of India & Ors v. Kamal Kumar
The Delhi High Court condoned a 136-139 day delay in filing government appeals under SAFEMA, holding that bona fide procedural delays with diligent efforts constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay.
ZTE Corporation v. Siddhant Garg & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the restoration of a struck off company under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, rejecting the appellant's challenge based on mala fide collusion and nullity of arbitral awards.