Delhi High Court

98,981 judgments

Year:

Asha Rani Gupta v. Ravindera Memorial Public School & Anr

06 Jun 2013 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7903-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of a private school employee without prior approval of the Directorate of Education is void, and ex post facto approval cannot validate such dismissal.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 prior approval dismissal of employee jurisdictional defect

Nikhil Mehta & Anr. v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.

05 Jun 2013 · R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:2979

The High Court held that aggrieved persons must exhaust statutory remedies under Sections 154(3) and 156(3) Cr.P.C. before seeking writ relief for non-registration of FIR or improper police investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant FIR registration Section 154(3) Cr.P.C. Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. High Court writ petition

Kartar Singh v. Major Murlidhar & Ors.

05 Jun 2013 · R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:2978

The Delhi High Court upheld the Sessions Court order directing restoration of possession under section 456(1) Cr.P.C. following a final conviction for house trespass involving criminal force or intimidation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 456(1) Cr.P.C. Section 448 IPC house trespass restoration of possession

Gopal Krishan Dhir & Ors v. New Delhi Municipal Council

05 Jun 2013 · Manmohan Singh; R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:2980-DB

The Delhi High Court held that unconditional undertakings to vacate premises are binding, dismissing the appellants' challenge to eviction despite absence of a formal decision on the property's development.

civil appeal_dismissed unconditional undertaking eviction heritage building museum conversion

South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Gagan Sahni

03 Jun 2013 · Manmohan Singh; R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:2977-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 221-day delay in filing under the Arbitration Act, holding that the statutory limitation period is strict and unextendible without sufficient cause.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation Act, 1963 condonation of delay

Mitsubishi Corporation India Pvt Ltd v. Tapa AIG General Insurance Co Ltd

31 May 2013 · J. R. Midha · 2013:DHC:8425

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions as withdrawn and allowed interlocutory applications after parties amicably settled their dispute recorded in a final arbitral award.

civil appeal_dismissed amicable settlement arbitral award dismissal of petition interlocutory application

Hitender Kumar v. State

31 May 2013 · Kailash Gambhir · 2013:DHC:8220

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a criminal petition with liberty to raise jurisdictional issues before the appropriate Magistrate and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural jurisdiction withdrawal of petition liberty to raise issue Metropolitan Magistrate

M/S Geodesic Techniques Pvt Ltd v. M/S Era Infra Engineering Ltd

31 May 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:8122

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes between the parties, allowing objections on arbitrability to be raised before the arbitrator.

other petition_allowed Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator arbitrability sole arbitrator

BHAYANA BUILDERS PVT LTD v. NOIDA CYBER PARK PVT LTD

31 May 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:8089

The Delhi High Court appointed a retired ADJ as sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes between Bhayana Builders Pvt Ltd and Noida Cyber Park Pvt Ltd.

civil petition_allowed Section 11(5) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator sole arbitrator arbitration proceedings

M/S DESTIMONEY FINANCIAL v. AMIT ARORA

31 May 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:7986

Execution petitions filed by decree holder dismissed as not maintainable due to timely objections filed by judgment debtors under Section 34 of the Act.

civil appeal_dismissed execution petition Section 34 objections decree holder

Sri Balaji Action Medical Institute v. Union of India & Ors.

31 May 2013 · G. S. Sistani · 2013:DHC:7608

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent authority to decide the petitioner’s pending representation for restoration of affiliation within two weeks, disposing of the writ petition without granting substantive relief.

administrative other writ petition affiliation restoration General Nursing and Midwifery Course representation

Ridge View Service Station v. Sadanand

31 May 2013 · Vipin Sanghi · 2013:DHC:7477

The Delhi High Court upheld Labour Court awards declaring termination without enquiry illegal and substituted reinstatement with compensation due to breakdown of employer-employee relationship.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F retrenchment illegal termination

Regus Business Centre (Delhi) Pvt Ltd v. ABW Infrastructure Ltd & Ors

31 May 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:7115

The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement between parties in a maintenance charge dispute, dismissed interlocutory petitions as withdrawn, deleted an improper party, and allowed the civil suit to proceed for adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed maintenance charges settlement withdrawal of petitions deletion of party

Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Atul Gupta & Ors.

31 May 2013 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2013:DHC:6727 V

The Delhi High Court allowed the parties' lawful compromise application in a software license dispute, decreeing the suit accordingly and binding the parties to the settlement.

civil appeal_allowed compromise application Order 23 Rule 3 CPC Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC software license dispute

Kanwar Baldev Raj v. Seema Kanwar

31 May 2013 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2013:DHC:6715

The Delhi High Court allowed an early hearing application, held a lawful compromise binding, disposed of the main suit accordingly, and dismissed related suits as withdrawn.

civil appeal_allowed compromise settlement disposal of suit withdrawal of suit

Baij Nath Mittal v. State Thr. C.B.I.

31 May 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:2963

The Delhi High Court suspended the substantive sentences of two appellants convicted of embezzlement pending appeal, balancing the seriousness of the offence with their conduct and health.

criminal sentence_modified suspension of sentence Section 389 Cr.P.C. embezzlement conspiracy

Daryao Singh v. CBI

31 May 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:2964

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a delayed fraud case involving farmhouse development, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and pending arbitration proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. inordinate delay arbitration proceedings

Rakhi Mandal v. State

31 May 2013 · Sanjiv Khanna; Ved Prakash Vaish · 2013:DHC:2925-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for the murder of Archana Grover based on credible eyewitness testimony, corroborative recoveries, and mobile phone records, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant child witness testimony last seen evidence recovery of stolen articles mobile phone call records

Delhi & District Cricket Association v. Rajnish Aggarwal & Ors.

31 May 2013 · V.K. Shali · 2013:DHC:2929

The Delhi High Court set aside an interim injunction restraining elected office bearers of DDCA, holding that truncated election challenges and reliance on unverified CCTV footage without considering official reports are impermissible, and remanded the matter for trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction election dispute proxy votes Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC

Mohd. Saleem v. The State

31 May 2013 · Sanjiv Khanna; Ved Prakash Vaish · 2013:DHC:2930-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304A IPC read with Section 34 IPC, holding that he shared common intention only for rash and negligent driving and illegal transport of cow meat, not for murder.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 34 IPC common intention murder attempt to murder