Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Atul Gupta & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 31 May 2013 · 2013:DHC:6727
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
CS(OS) 914/2013
2013:DHC:6727 V
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the parties' lawful compromise application in a software license dispute, decreeing the suit accordingly and binding the parties to the settlement.

Full Text
Translation output
46$^ HIGH COURT OF DELHI lA No.9871/2013 (of the parties u/0 23 R-3 CPC) in CS(OS)
914/2013 & lA No.8034/2013 (u/0 39 R-1&2 CPC)
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Karan Kamra, Adv.
VERSUS
ATUL GUPTA & ORS.
Through;
Defendants Mr. Naveen Tripathi & Mr. S.M.
Tripathi, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
31.05.2013
ORDER

1. The counsels for the plaintiff and the defendants support the application.

2. The application is stated tobe signed by the authorized representative of the plaintiff and by the defendant no. 1 as well as by the authorized signatory of the defendants no.2 to 4 Companies and their respective advocates andis also accompanied by the affidavits of the signatories to the application. The application is also accompanied with an inventory of software license requirement of the defendants, Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the defendants no.2 to 4 and photocopy of cheques issued by the defendants no.2&3 in favour ofthe advocates for the plaintiffs.

3. Thecompromise asrecorded inthe application is found tobelawful.

4. The application is allowed. CS(OS) 914/2013 Page 1 of[2] 2013:DHC:6727 V

5. The undertakings of the parties as contained in the application are accepted and the parties ordered to be bound thereby and cautioned of consequences of breach thereof

6. The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise application which shall form part ofthe decree sheet.

7. Decree sheet be drawn up.

8. The date of25^^ September, 2013 already scheduled is cancelled. MAY 31, 2013 'gsr' CS(OS) 914/2013 RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW, J Page 2 of[2]