M/S DESTIMONEY FINANCIAL v. AMIT ARORA

Delhi High Court · 31 May 2013 · 2013:DHC:7986
Manmohan Singh
EX.P. 43/2013
2013:DHC:7986
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

Execution petitions filed by decree holder dismissed as not maintainable due to timely objections filed by judgment debtors under Section 34 of the Act.

Full Text
Translation output
$-17 & 18 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
EX.P. 43/2013
M/S DESTIMONEY FINANCIAL Decree Holder
Through Mr.Rajul Shrivastava, Adv.
VERSUS
AMIT ARORA Judgement Debtor Thi'ough Mi-.Sachin Mittal, Adv.
EX.P. 44/2013
M/S DESTIMONEY FINANCIAL Decree Holder
Through Mr.Rajul Shrivastava, Adv.
VERSUS
AMIT KUMAR Judgement Debtor
Through Mr.Sachin Mittal, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
31.05.2013 Learned counsel for the
ORDER
debtor states that the judgment debtor has filed objections under Section 34 ofthe Act in the Registiy which are within time. In view thereof, the present petitions have become infructuous. The same ar e dismissed as not maintainable.
S^GH?i! MAY 31, 2013 2013:DHC:7986