Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Saurabh Jain v. Mukesh Chand Singhal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the imposition of costs and striking off defence for delay in filing the written statement, holding that supervisory jurisdiction should not be used to waive legitimate cost orders.
Kishore Kumar v. Suresh Sethi & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging maintainability of an eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the tenant must avail the statutory remedy of revision against refusal of leave to defend.
Jaya Devi v. Bhupesh Kumar & Anr.
The High Court held that objections under Section 47 CPC are confined to execution issues and dismissed the petition challenging an ex-parte decree as not void or nullity.
Bhushan Kumar v. Gaurav
The High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to allow belated filing of the written statement upon sufficient cause, dismissing the petition challenging the order.
Sunehri Bagh Builders Pvt Ltd v. Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference under Article 227 in arbitral proceedings is limited to exceptional cases of perversity and dismissed the petition challenging the Sole Arbitrator's order refusing production of documents at the final arguments stage.
G S C INDUSTRIES v. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition holding that a bona fide cheque dishonour due to bank's technical fault does not disentitle a taxpayer from amnesty scheme benefits or attract penalty and interest.
M/S RG ASSOCIATES v. M/S P K INDUSTRIES
The High Court of Delhi allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the civil appeal and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Anita & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings challenging statutory rules, disposing of the petition as withdrawn.
Meenu Sachdev v. Managing Committee Sri Sathya Sai Vidya Vihar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that pending disciplinary proceedings do not bar statutory re-employment of a teacher who attains superannuation after November 1 under Rule 110(2) of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, and directed reinstatement with benefits.
Saleem v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted furlough to a life convict despite previous absconding on parole, emphasizing the rehabilitative objectives of prison rules and the prisoner's subsequent good conduct.
Ravi Mohan Sharma v. C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order allowing the prosecution to place additional CFSL expert evidence on record and summon an assistant scientific officer as witness after closure of prosecution evidence, holding such action permissible under Sections 91 and 311 Cr.P.C. to ensure a just trial.
Kanishk Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that sexual intercourse obtained by false promise of marriage without intent to marry vitiates consent under Section 90 IPC, and refused to quash the FIR alleging rape under Section 376 IPC.
M/S HT MEDIA LIMITED v. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR
The Delhi High Court held that delay in claim processing by the Official Liquidator due to verification of multiple claims does not amount to wilful disobedience or contempt, but directed adherence to timelines.
Mohd Sajid v. Commissioner of Customs New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a show cause notice issued within the six-month period under Section 110 of the Customs Act is valid despite delayed delivery, directing adjudication to proceed with opportunity for reply and provisional release if sought.
A B C ENTERPRISES v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 102
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a belated appeal against a GST demand order due to non-receipt of notice, while upholding the presumption of service through automated electronic communication.
Divya Rastogi v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to the accused in a large-scale financial fraud case due to the gravity of allegations, risk of absconding, and ongoing investigation.
M/S GOURISHANKAR POLYMER INDUSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
The Delhi High Court held that classification issues of a recurring legal nature must be adjudicated irrespective of monetary limits and remanded the matter to CESTAT for fresh consideration.
MD. Ayaz v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, holding that sufficient prima facie material exists to proceed to trial despite absence of direct evidence or dying declarations.
Arvind v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of an unrecognized street vendor seeking relief and directed that he may participate in the ongoing survey under the Urban Street Vendors Scheme for recognition.
Neelgiri Machinery v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders due to improper electronic service of notices and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after ensuring fair opportunity to be heard.