Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Sunehri Bagh Builders Pvt Ltd v. Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd

20 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1828

The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference under Article 227 in arbitral proceedings is limited to exceptional cases of perversity and dismissed the petition challenging the Sole Arbitrator's order refusing production of documents at the final arguments stage.

other petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Tribunal Article 227 of Constitution of India Judicial interference Arbitration and Conciliation Act

G S C INDUSTRIES v. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

20 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1849

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition holding that a bona fide cheque dishonour due to bank's technical fault does not disentitle a taxpayer from amnesty scheme benefits or attract penalty and interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Property Tax Amnesty Scheme Cheque dishonour Technical fault Penalty and interest

M/S RG ASSOCIATES v. M/S P K INDUSTRIES

20 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1840-DB

The High Court of Delhi allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the civil appeal and disposed of the matter accordingly.

civil other Procedural appeal withdrawal leave to withdraw appeal disposal of appeal High Court of Delhi

Anita & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

20 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1834-DB

The High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings challenging statutory rules, disposing of the petition as withdrawn.

other other withdrawal of petition liberty to file fresh proceedings statutory rules petition disposal

Meenu Sachdev v. Managing Committee Sri Sathya Sai Vidya Vihar & Anr.

20 Mar 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 973

The Delhi High Court held that pending disciplinary proceedings do not bar statutory re-employment of a teacher who attains superannuation after November 1 under Rule 110(2) of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, and directed reinstatement with benefits.

labor petition_allowed Significant statutory re-employment superannuation disciplinary proceedings natural justice

Saleem v. State (NCT of Delhi)

20 Mar 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:1858

The Delhi High Court granted furlough to a life convict despite previous absconding on parole, emphasizing the rehabilitative objectives of prison rules and the prisoner's subsequent good conduct.

criminal petition_allowed Significant furlough parole Delhi Prison Rules absconding

Ravi Mohan Sharma v. C.B.I.

20 Mar 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:1854
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order allowing the prosecution to place additional CFSL expert evidence on record and summon an assistant scientific officer as witness after closure of prosecution evidence, holding such action permissible under Sections 91 and 311 Cr.P.C. to ensure a just trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 311 CrPC Section 91 CrPC CFSL report expert evidence

Kanishk Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi

20 Mar 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:1855

The Delhi High Court held that sexual intercourse obtained by false promise of marriage without intent to marry vitiates consent under Section 90 IPC, and refused to quash the FIR alleging rape under Section 376 IPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant consent rape false promise of marriage Section 90 IPC

M/S HT MEDIA LIMITED v. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR

20 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1879

The Delhi High Court held that delay in claim processing by the Official Liquidator due to verification of multiple claims does not amount to wilful disobedience or contempt, but directed adherence to timelines.

civil petition_dismissed Official Liquidator claim verification wilful disobedience court order compliance

Mohd Sajid v. Commissioner of Customs New Delhi

20 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:1865-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a show cause notice issued within the six-month period under Section 110 of the Customs Act is valid despite delayed delivery, directing adjudication to proceed with opportunity for reply and provisional release if sought.

administrative petition_dismissed Customs Act 1962 Section 110 show cause notice limitation period

A B C ENTERPRISES v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 102

20 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:1897-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a belated appeal against a GST demand order due to non-receipt of notice, while upholding the presumption of service through automated electronic communication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 show cause notice service of notice

Divya Rastogi v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

20 Mar 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:1881

Bail was denied to the accused in a large-scale financial fraud case due to the gravity of allegations, risk of absconding, and ongoing investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 439 Cr.P.C. embezzlement forgery

M/S GOURISHANKAR POLYMER INDUSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

20 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:1869-DB

The Delhi High Court held that classification issues of a recurring legal nature must be adjudicated irrespective of monetary limits and remanded the matter to CESTAT for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 130 classification issue monetary limit

MD. Ayaz v. State of Delhi

20 Mar 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2025:DHC:1778

The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, holding that sufficient prima facie material exists to proceed to trial despite absence of direct evidence or dying declarations.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charges Section 498A IPC Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide

Arvind v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

20 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:1868-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of an unrecognized street vendor seeking relief and directed that he may participate in the ongoing survey under the Urban Street Vendors Scheme for recognition.

administrative petition_dismissed Urban Street Vendors Scheme, 2007 street vendor recognition writ petition municipal authority

Neelgiri Machinery v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax

20 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:1867-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders due to improper electronic service of notices and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after ensuring fair opportunity to be heard.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal service of notice natural justice

Devinder Singh v. Union of India

19 Mar 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:1740-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that BSF officers delayed in joining training due to administrative lapses are entitled to seniority fixation with their original batch based on merit, distinguishing the Supreme Court's Rohitash Kumar ruling and preserving settled seniority.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant seniority fixation Border Security Force Assistant Commandant Rule 3(3)(ii)

Iqrar Ahmed @ Afzal v. State NCT of Delhi

19 Mar 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:1739

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a serious assault case after balancing procedural and substantive considerations, emphasizing that seriousness alone cannot deny bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC Section 304 IPC Section 308 IPC

Gulshan Lal J. Manaktala v. M/S Bodycare (I) P. Ltd.

19 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2716

The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's application to dissolve M/s Bodycare (India) Pvt. Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 after completion of winding up and authorized transfer of unclaimed dividends to the Reserve Bank of India.

corporate appeal_allowed Company dissolution Official Liquidator Companies Act 1956 Section 481

SI Amit Kumar v. Praveen

19 Mar 2025 · Amit Mahajan, J. · 2025:DHC:2360

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal under Sections 308/34 IPC due to contradictions in prosecution evidence and unexplained delay in filing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal Section 378 CrPC injured witness testimony contradictions in prosecution evidence