Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Ishwari Keswani v. Gulshan Rai Kukreja & Anr.
The High Court allowed the petitioner to raise the maintainability issue before the trial court by permitting the pending Order VII Rule 11 CPC application to be agitated, and disposed of the revision petition accordingly.
Husky Injection Molding Systems Shanghai Ltd & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the DGTR's disclosure statement in an anti-dumping investigation, emphasizing procedural compliance and allowing petitioners to submit clarifications without rescinding the statement.
Jai Durga Rubberised Fabrics India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Department's appeal before CESTAT on monetary limit grounds, quashing contradictory tribunal orders and directing release of the petitioner's bank guarantee.
B.K. Gupta v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court restrained enforcement of a recovery certificate issued by the Registrar Co-operative Societies based on vague demands by an improperly managed cooperative society, directing further investigation and adjudication.
Parvesh Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that MCD's seizure of a street vendor's goods without following prescribed procedure and issuing a receipt was improper, directing release of non-perishable goods upon payment of nominal charges while affirming MCD's statutory seizure powers.
Ajay Kumar Malik v. State Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of pension benefits due to shortfall in pensionable service and held that no condonation of such shortfall is permissible under the applicable Pension and Service Rules.
M/S Intense Nutra Care and Anr. v. Gireesh Sardana
The Delhi High Court granted liberty to the petitioners to raise territorial jurisdiction objections before the Trial Court with the respondent's consent.
Manu Markande & Ors. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that while it has inherent power to extend time for filing amended pleadings beyond 30 days under Order VI Rule 18 CPC, such extension was refused due to insufficient and unsubstantiated reasons for delay.
Mohammad Arham v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that failure to issue a show cause notice within the statutory period under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962, renders detention of goods impermissible and directed their release.
Kavita & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal awarding compensation to the deceased's dependents, holding that absence of a ticket does not negate bonafide passenger status in railway accident claims under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.
Shakti Pump India Ltd v. Apex Buildsys Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of an arbitrator without an express written waiver is void ab initio and terminated the arbitrator's mandate, affirming the necessity of impartiality and procedural equality in arbitration.
Whitefields Overseas Limited v. Bijender Chauhan
The High Court granted the petitioner one final opportunity to cross-examine a defense witness with exemplary costs, emphasizing expeditious trial conduct and discouraging delay.
Pradeep Kumar v. Madan Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's rejection of a delayed application for handwriting expert examination but waived the imposed cost following the suit's dismissal.
Babloo v. Jawahar and Ors.
The High Court allowed the petitioner to lead additional evidence on newly framed issues after closure of evidence, imposing costs for delay and directing time-bound trial management.
Mr. Shivam Jangra and Mr. Sahib Gurdeep Singh v. Ved Prakash Kathuria
The Delhi High Court directed the executing court to expeditiously decide the pending application under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC, clarifying procedural aspects and ensuring cooperation of the judgment debtor.
Arihant Superstructures Limited v. Pushpa Agarwal
Delhi High Court dismissed petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, directing petitioner to approach Rajasthan High Court where cause of action arose.
Sudhir Agarwal v. Tirupati Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 10 CPC holding that suits involving the same parties but different reliefs and issues are not barred by pendency of a prior suit.
Tamilarasan Rajendran v. Sherley Panneer
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to expeditiously decide the petitioner's application for restoration of a dismissed guardianship petition to enable visitation rights.
Megha Khetrapal v. Rajat Kapoor
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of interim maintenance to a well-qualified wife deliberately remaining unemployed to claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Ashok Kumar Dahiya
The Delhi High Court allowed the State's Criminal Leave Petition to appeal against the acquittal of an accused in a corruption case, emphasizing the need for proper evidence appreciation and sanction for prosecution.