Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
M/s Iconnect India v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that unlocking mobile phones prior to export does not amount to 'taken into use' under Duty Drawback Rules, allowing exporters to claim duty drawback benefits and quashing contrary administrative orders.
Sourabh Bhutani v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of Cooperative Societies to recognize the petitioner's membership and forward his name for allotment of a flat, holding that non-availability of original society records cannot defeat a binding arbitration award and prior orders.
Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
The Delhi High Court directed the DRI to copy data from seized electronic devices with integrity safeguards and return the devices to petitioners after verification, establishing procedural safeguards for handling electronic evidence in customs investigations.
D K Sharma v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to invalid sanction for prosecution and failure to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.
Shashikant v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to condone delay in filing the written statement, emphasizing adjudication on merits over procedural technicalities and dismissed the petition under Article 227.
Kamal Raj Bansi v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed NDMC to consider and decide the petitioner's representation for alternative vending site allocation within two months, affirming protection for recognized street vendors pending eligibility determination.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Indian Broadcasting Foundation
The Delhi High Court held that deployment of funds by a charitable institution in shares of a government-mandated not-for-profit entity does not constitute an investment under the Income Tax Act, thereby upholding exemption under Sections 11 and 12.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Indian Broadcasting Foundation
The Delhi High Court upheld that funds deployed by a not-for-profit entity pursuant to government directives in a non-profit subsidiary do not constitute an investment violating Income Tax exemption provisions.
Radhey Shyam Garg v. Sangita Poddar
The Delhi High Court recast issues in a suit for recovery of loan and directed the trial court to proceed with evidence in a manner agreed by parties, emphasizing expeditious disposal due to the petitioner's illness.
Sarika Bhagat v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and related proceedings for non-compliance with the mandatory affidavit requirement under Section 156(3) CrPC, reaffirming Supreme Court precedents to prevent abuse of process.
Prashant Kumar Parashar v. Sumit Singla & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that the cause of action arose in Bangalore and thus Delhi lacked territorial jurisdiction.
Faith Constructions v. N.W.G.E.L Church
Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding it lacked territorial jurisdiction as the cause of action and respondent’s business were in Odisha, not Delhi.
Ravinder Pal Singh v. Registrar Coop. Societies, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging membership transfer in a cooperative society, holding the petitioner lacked locus standi and elections conducted under court supervision rendered the petition infructuous.
Delhi Technological University v. Dr Jai Gopal Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of appointments made under a special note in a recruitment advertisement, ruling that essential qualifications must be explicitly stated and quashing termination orders based on implied qualification requirements.
Paras Products v. Commissioner Central GST, Delhi North
The Delhi High Court quashed confiscation orders passed after an 11-year delay in adjudication, holding that statutory authorities must conclude proceedings within a reasonable time and directed release of bank guarantees.
MS Shyam Indus Power Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Principal Commissioner CGST Delhi North
The Delhi High Court quashed service tax demands and notices due to inordinate delay of 6 to 11 years in adjudication, reaffirming that tax authorities must conclude proceedings within a reasonable time under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Saurabh Jain v. Mukesh Chand Singhal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the imposition of costs and striking off defence for delay in filing the written statement, holding that supervisory jurisdiction should not be used to waive legitimate cost orders.
Kishore Kumar v. Suresh Sethi & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging maintainability of an eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the tenant must avail the statutory remedy of revision against refusal of leave to defend.
Jaya Devi v. Bhupesh Kumar & Anr.
The High Court held that objections under Section 47 CPC are confined to execution issues and dismissed the petition challenging an ex-parte decree as not void or nullity.
Bhushan Kumar v. Gaurav
The High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to allow belated filing of the written statement upon sufficient cause, dismissing the petition challenging the order.