Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

M/S IMPRESSIVE DATA SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER (APPEALS-I), CENTRAL TAX GST, DELHI

15 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2651-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act cannot be waived by the court and dismissed the petition seeking such waiver.

tax petition_dismissed Significant pre-deposit Section 107(6) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Input Tax Credit

Aseem Rajpal v. Divya Duggal

15 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2703

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim maintenance order of Rs. 15,000 per month to a wife under the DV Act, rejecting the husband's challenge to the income assessment and entitlement despite her unemployment and claimed expenses.

family petition_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005 income assessment unemployment

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Deepak Puri & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2701

The Delhi High Court dismissed CBI's petition seeking Look Out Circulars against accused in a white-collar crime case, holding that the conditions for LOC issuance under amended guidelines were not met.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Look Out Circular Section 482 CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act Indian Penal Code

Rinku Kanjar v. Union of India

15 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2629-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of a candidate's CISF recruitment candidature for failing to possess a valid Heavy Motor Vehicle driving license on the cut-off date, rejecting reliance on a learner's license and suspended licenses obtained by fraud.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant driving license learner's license cut-off date CISF recruitment

Suraj Prakash Arora & Ors. v. Roshanara Club Limited & Ors.

15 Apr 2025 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2025:DHC:2555

The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction to entertain suits on company oppression and mismanagement matters triable by NCLT under Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, and rejected the plaint at the threshold.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Section 430 Companies Act 2013 NCLT jurisdiction Civil court jurisdiction Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Rajender Singh v. Town Vending Committee Through Chairperson & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2604-DB

The Delhi High Court directed inclusion of the petitioner in the vendor survey under the 2019 Scheme and ordered consideration of alternate vending site allotment based on seniority despite the original site being declared a non-vending zone.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Street Vendors Protection Scheme 2019 Town Vending Committee vending site allotment seniority of vendors

Aarti v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2603-DB

The Delhi High Court directed NDMC to verify and allow the petitioner, wife of a deceased recognized street vendor, to participate in the vendor survey and substitute her name in place of her husband’s in accordance with law.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 vendor succession writ petition vendor survey

Kamla Thadani alias Sona Thadani v. Ashok Thadani & Ors.

15 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2642

The High Court directed the Trial Court to decide on the admissibility of documents introduced through a witness before permitting further cross-examination, emphasizing procedural fairness in civil trial evidence.

civil other Procedural admissibility of documents Order VII Rule 14(2) CPC cross-examination possession suit

M/S GLOBAL SALES INDIA & ANR. v. AMIT SHARMA

15 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2640

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to the extent of directing the trial court to proceed disregarding an additional acknowledged invoice, emphasizing procedural rigour and non-prejudice in commercial recovery suits.

civil appeal_allowed commercial suit recovery suit additional document Order XI Rules 1 & 2 CPC

Sparsh Dhir v. Esha Dhir

15 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2638

The High Court granted the petitioner a final opportunity to file his income affidavit and be heard on the Section 24 application, subject to payment of costs, thereby balancing procedural compliance with substantive justice in matrimonial proceedings.

family petition_dismissed Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 24 income affidavit non-cooperation

Kashyapi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Anr v. K.D.K. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and Anr

15 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2637

The High Court set aside the trial court's order allowing amendment of plaint without hearing the defendants and directed fresh hearing in accordance with natural justice.

civil appeal_allowed amendment of plaint opportunity of hearing principles of natural justice trial court

Falcon Licensing Limited v. PRI Enterprises Private Limited & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:2592

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove a trademark registered in bad faith and non-use, affirming prior user rights and condemning trademark squatting under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark registration bad faith prior user rights trademark squatting

Pawan Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)

15 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2578

The Delhi High Court held that a warning punishment for overstaying furlough does not bar granting subsequent furlough, emphasizing the reformatory purpose of furlough and the petitioner's prior good conduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant furlough warning punishment overstay prisoner rights

Manjula v. State of NCT Delhi

15 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2577
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Anticipatory bail granted to accused under Section 20 NDPS Act due to her absence during raid and prima facie irregularities in investigation documents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail NDPS Act Section 20 NDPS intermediate quantity

J. G’S DEPARTMENTAL STORE v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 60(1)

15 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:2562-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2017-18 as it exceeded the scope of the notice under Section 148A(b), emphasizing the need for procedural fairness and opportunity to respond.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A Reopening of assessment Demonetization period

FDC LIMITED v. PALSONS DERMA PRIVATE LIMITED

15 Apr 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:2576
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of the prior user plaintiff restraining the defendant from using a deceptively similar trademark, emphasizing the superiority of prior user rights over registered rights in passing off actions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off prior user rights trademark infringement interim injunction

Devendri v. Ajay Pawar & Ors.

15 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2639

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to reconsider the stay of a partition suit under Section 10 CPC after comparing issues with a pending Bulandshahr suit and hearing both parties.

civil other Section 10 CPC stay of suit multiplicity of litigation partition suit

Froot Trip Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. The NCT of State & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:2491

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principle that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement Article 226 Article 227

Gaurav Gaur & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:2488

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine and voluntary settlement between estranged spouses, emphasizing the Court's power to end proceedings to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS 2023 Section 498A IPC amicable settlement

Shailendra Jain v. Union of India

09 Apr 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:2406

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the NCDRC order, holding that the Railway is not liable for theft of un-booked luggage absent proven negligence or misconduct by its officials.

consumer_protection petition_dismissed Significant Railway liability theft of luggage deficiency of service consumer protection