Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

University of Delhi v. Dr Kiran Gupta

09 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2495-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate's promotion seniority under CAS-2010 must relate to the date of successful assessment if earlier attempts failed, denying retrospective promotion from the minimum eligibility date.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Career Advancement Scheme 2010 Promotion seniority Retrospective promotion Clause 6.3.12 CAS-2010

M/S LORDS MARK INDUSTRIES PVT LTD & ORS. v. MRS KANTI SINGH & ORS.

09 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2580

The Delhi High Court held that the Order XV-A CPC relating to deposit of rent arrears and the Order XV-A under the Commercial Courts Act coexist, allowing the Trial Court's order to stand subject to interim deposit and procedural clarification.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XV-A CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015 deposit of rent arrears striking off defence

Sunil Gulati v. Additional Commissioner CGST Delhi South Commissionerate & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2541-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST penalty order, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies under Section 107 of the CGST Act.

tax appeal_dismissed CGST Act Input Tax Credit penalty show cause notice

M/S. Vallabh Textiles v. Additional Commissioner Central Tax GST, Delhi

09 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2559-DB

The Delhi High Court held that denial of cross-examination in GST adjudication proceedings is not a violation of natural justice absent prejudice and directed the petitioner to exhaust statutory appellate remedies before invoking writ jurisdiction.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant GST liability cross-examination Show Cause Notice natural justice

Ravi Shankar CGHS Ltd. v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies

09 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2558-DB

The Delhi High Court held that members enrolled before 2nd July 2007 are exempt from Rule 90 Committee verification, directing the Registrar to forward their names to DDA for allotment of flats without delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Co-Operative Societies Act, 2003 Rule 90 Committee verification Delhi Cooperative Society Rules, 2007 draw of lots

Ishan Gupta v. National Testing Agency

09 Apr 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:2549

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate cannot change category from General to PwD for JEE Main Session II after appearing in Session I as General, but allowed the NTA discretion to consider such change before Session II results if the candidate undertakes not to rely on Session I scores.

administrative other Significant JEE Main 2025 PwD category change Specific Learning Disability Information Bulletin 2025

Bhavna Luthra v. Assistant Commissioner, Range 8, CGST, Delhi & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2540-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the legal heir of a deceased GST registrant is entitled to refund of excess electronic cash ledger balance and directed the GST Department to comply with earlier court orders for refund.

tax other Significant GST refund electronic cash ledger legal heir GST registration cancellation

Mohammed Samjad and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

09 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2539-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of street vendors who violated vending certificate conditions, allowing continued vending only if conditions are met and directing release of seized goods.

administrative petition_dismissed street vendors vending certificate municipal corporation eviction

Ram Kumar v. Town Vending Committee (NDMC) & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2538-DB

The Delhi High Court directed inclusion of a recognized street vendor in the ongoing vending survey and ordered consideration of an alternate vending site allotment by NDMC.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant town vending survey street vendors alternate vending site NDMC

Javed Alam v. Commissioner of Customs

09 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2531-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the confiscation order for failure to issue a Show Cause Notice and grant personal hearing, emphasizing mandatory compliance with natural justice under the Customs Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice Personal Hearing Natural Justice

State v. Darshan Singh; Harjeet Singh; Yogesh Khanna; Sonu

09 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2529

The Delhi High Court allowed the State's appeal partially, convicting the accused for wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation, but acquitting them of kidnapping to murder, and granted probation considering their antecedents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 364 IPC wrongful restraint voluntarily causing hurt criminal intimidation

Epiphany Hospitality Pvt Ltd v. The Commissioner Excise Entertainment and Luxury Tax Department Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:2516

The Delhi High Court held that a restaurant’s premises remain deemed registered under the Delhi Eating House Regulations during renewal pendency, restraining excise authorities from suspending liquor sales solely for non-renewal until a final decision is made.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Eating House Registration Delhi Eating House Registration Regulations 2023 Excise License L-17 License

Arvind Mishra v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors.

09 Apr 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:2509

The Delhi High Court upheld police discretion to deny procession permission on security grounds but directed consideration of a limited route to balance public order with fundamental rights under Article 19.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant religious procession permission denial law and order Article 19

Anil Kumar Aggarwal v. Directorate of Enforcement

09 Apr 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:2512
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in a PMLA case due to prolonged trial delay, holding that constitutional right to liberty under Article 21 overrides stringent statutory bail conditions where trial is unlikely to conclude soon.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act Article 21 prolonged incarceration

H.S. Oberoi Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Superior Glass Pvt. Ltd.

09 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2508

The Delhi High Court granted the defendant one final opportunity to complete evidence in a recovery suit despite earlier closure by the trial court, imposing costs for delay.

civil other adjournment examination of witness cross-examination costs for delay

Ram Kishor Arora v. Rohit Verma & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2507
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed recall of coercive measures against the petitioner under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 upon his undertaking to appear physically before the NCDRC and comply with directions.

consumer petition_allowed Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Section 72 Execution Petition

Resurgent Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Strum Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2506

The Delhi High Court held that an application for restoration of a dismissed Order VII Rule 10 CPC application can be considered on merits despite being moved under an incorrect provision, directing the trial court to decide it accordingly.

civil other Significant Order VII Rule 10 CPC Order IX Rule 7 CPC restoration of application default dismissal

M/S PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD v. M/S SKYLARK BUILDTECH LTD & ANR

09 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2505

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a non-commercial suit due to non-supply of complete plaint and documents, emphasizing deciding cases on merits over technicalities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay written statement non-commercial suit meaningful service

CONCEPTUM LOGISTICS INDIA PVT LTD v. SAMRAJAYA GLOBAL SHIPPING SERVICES

09 Apr 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:2501

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application for leave to defend a summary suit, holding that the defence of coercion was a belated, unsubstantiated claim lacking triable issues, entitling the plaintiff to summary judgment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit coercion

Vinod @ Binnu v. The State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2481

Bail was denied to the accused in a murder case where circumstantial evidence and forensic recovery of the weapon at the accused's instance established a strong prosecution case.

criminal bail_denied bail Section 302 IPC circumstantial evidence last seen testimony