Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Resurgent Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Strum Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2506

The Delhi High Court held that an application for restoration of a dismissed Order VII Rule 10 CPC application can be considered on merits despite being moved under an incorrect provision, directing the trial court to decide it accordingly.

civil other Significant Order VII Rule 10 CPC Order IX Rule 7 CPC restoration of application default dismissal

M/S PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD v. M/S SKYLARK BUILDTECH LTD & ANR

09 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2505

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a non-commercial suit due to non-supply of complete plaint and documents, emphasizing deciding cases on merits over technicalities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay written statement non-commercial suit meaningful service

CONCEPTUM LOGISTICS INDIA PVT LTD v. SAMRAJAYA GLOBAL SHIPPING SERVICES

09 Apr 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:2501

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application for leave to defend a summary suit, holding that the defence of coercion was a belated, unsubstantiated claim lacking triable issues, entitling the plaintiff to summary judgment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit coercion

Vinod @ Binnu v. The State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2481

Bail was denied to the accused in a murder case where circumstantial evidence and forensic recovery of the weapon at the accused's instance established a strong prosecution case.

criminal bail_denied bail Section 302 IPC circumstantial evidence last seen testimony

Saurabh v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

09 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2483

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a young accused in a mobile phone theft case where the prosecution did not raise serious objections and the location evidence was inconclusive.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail mobile phone theft mobile tower location Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305

Sagir v. State (Govt. NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

09 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2485

The Delhi High Court allowed furlough to a long-term convict despite delayed surrender, emphasizing reformative principles and the prisoner's overall good conduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant furlough delayed surrender reformative tools long-term incarceration

Mohd. Saalim Qureshi v. Ms. Naghma

09 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2487

The Delhi High Court set aside an interim maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for failure to consider adultery allegations, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

family appeal_allowed Significant Section 125 Cr.P.C. interim maintenance adultery maintenance claim

Zhuhai Hansen Technology Co Ltd v. Aksh Optifibre Limited and Ors.

09 Apr 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:2490
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a subsequent settlement agreement superseding original contracts extinguishes the arbitration clause therein, and thus refused to refer the dispute to arbitration under Section 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement settlement agreement novation Section 45 Arbitration & Conciliation Act

Vijender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3041-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the petitioner’s representation against his transfer within three weeks and stayed the transfer pending such decision due to his son's serious medical condition.

administrative other transfer order writ petition medical disability representation

Nitin Bhayana v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Akash Deep Singh

08 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3690

The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order against the petitioner for offences under Sections 342 and 384 IPC due to lack of territorial jurisdiction and absence of prima facie case.

criminal petition_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction prima facie case summoning order Section 342 IPC

Jitender @ Chinku v. Babli @ Manvi & Anr.

08 Apr 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:2432

The Delhi High Court revised the interim maintenance awarded to the wife and child by assessing the husband's income based on minimum wages, reducing the quantum to a reasonable amount balancing both parties' needs.

family appeal_allowed Significant interim maintenance Section 125 CrPC income assessment minimum wages

Shakilur Rahman v. Management of Commonwealth War Graves Commission, Delhi War Commentary

08 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3009

The High Court held that the question of workman status under the Industrial Disputes Act should not be decided as a preliminary issue but along with all other issues to avoid piecemeal adjudication and delay.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 workman definition preliminary issue piecemeal adjudication

M/S HERBUL HENNA EXPORT HOUSE v. SH. VINAY KUMAR SINGH

08 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3005

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte Labour Court award due to sufficient cause for non-appearance, remanding the matter for fresh hearing.

labor appeal_allowed Significant ex parte award sufficient cause Labour Court Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957

Meena v. State of NCT of Delhi

08 Apr 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:2797-DB

The Delhi High Court declined to issue a writ of habeas corpus for a missing minor after exhaustive police investigation but directed continued investigation and monthly status reporting by the Anti-Human Trafficking Unit.

criminal petition_dismissed habeas corpus missing minor Article 226 Constitution of India Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita

Narendra Kumar Jain v. Harish Pratap Seonie & Ors.

08 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2717

The Delhi High Court held that a sub-tenant not satisfying the twin test under Section 17 of the DRC Act is not liable for mesne profits, discharged contempt notice against petitioners for bonafide conduct, and allowed withdrawal of the petition after deposit of user charges.

civil petition_allowed Delhi Rent Control Act Section 17 sub-tenant liability mesne profits

Anita Gupta v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi

08 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2641

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking a fresh murder investigation, holding that the police conducted a thorough probe concluding the death was accidental, and no grounds existed to interfere with the ongoing proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Article 226 Constitution Section 482 CrPC Section 302 IPC Section 120B IPC

Mr. Abhinav Rathi v. CDR Pyare Lal

08 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2456-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for primary hypertension aggravated by military service, dismissing the Union of India's challenge to the medical board's findings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Release Medical Board Initial Medical Board primary hypertension

Major Anish Muralidhar v. NK Nanak Chand

08 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2451-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension and broad banding to a retired army personnel whose hypertension was found aggravated by service in a counter-insurgency area, rejecting the Release Medical Board's contrary opinion.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Release Medical Board counter-insurgency operations

Dr. Anu Nayyar v. State of National Capital Territory of Delhi

08 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2596

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a radiologist for medical negligence, holding that mere diagnostic reporting without treatment advice does not constitute criminal liability under Section 304A IPC absent proof of gross negligence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant medical negligence radiologist duty Section 304A IPC criminal prosecution

Dayanand Adarsh Vidyalaya v. Deepa Chhibber & Ors.

08 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2517-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the order directing payment of six months' salary to school employees, holding that closure without DOE approval is illegal and does not absolve the employer from salary obligations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant school closure Department of Education approval Delhi School Education Rules 1973 employee salary entitlement