Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Staff Selection Commission (Hdqrs) & Anr. v. Jyoti Gupta

16 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2630-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's order directing a re-review medical examination, emphasizing the need to allow reasonable time for curing temporary medical conditions before final rejection in recruitment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Review Medical Examination Detailed Medical Examination Temporary unfitness Curability

Ajay Kumar v. University of Delhi

16 Apr 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:2800

The Delhi High Court held that a waitlisted candidate has no right to admission after the prescribed deadline, and vacant seats arising post-deadline must be carried forward to subsequent admission phases.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Ph.D. admission waitlist OBC category admission deadline

Sheikh Iqbal Ahmed & Ors v. Ashwani Kumar Gupta & Ors

16 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2608-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld interim directions regulating use of a common passage by appointing security and fixing gate timings to balance parties' rights.

civil appeal_dismissed interim injunction common passage mandatory injunction appointment of chowkidar

Staff Selection Commission & Anr v. Prem Prakash Joshi

16 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2024 SCC Online Delhi 7600

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination by a specialist board for a recruitment candidate declared medically unfit, emphasizing the necessity of specialist opinions in such cases.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant medical examination specialist opinion recruitment Central Administrative Tribunal

Chinki v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Anr.

16 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2747-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's refusal of interim relief in a recruitment dispute where the petitioner failed to respond timely to an appointment offer.

administrative petition_dismissed interim relief recruitment process Central Administrative Tribunal Article 226

Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors v. Savita

16 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2731-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of an EWS certificate issued before the financial year end, dismissing the Government's challenge to the Tribunal's order directing appointment of the candidate.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant EWS certificate validity financial year income certificate reservation in recruitment competent authority certificate

Govind Ram Meena & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2649-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT's refusal to grant relaxation in qualifying marks for promotion, holding that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to grant such relief and that non-compliance could not be enforced via Contempt Petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal relaxation in qualifying marks promotion Vice Principal

Union of India & Ors. v. Ashish Dhaker

16 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2654-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a specialist-inclusive Medical Board, emphasizing the necessity of specialist opinion in recruitment medical fitness assessments.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical examination specialist opinion recruitment Central Administrative Tribunal

Irshad Khan v. Rashida Alias Munni

16 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · MAT.APP.(F.C.) 141/2025

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Family Court's interlocutory order directing payment of maintenance arrears, holding such orders binding unless set aside and refusing to interfere with pending custody and procedural applications.

family appeal_dismissed interlocutory order maintenance arrears Family Court interim custody

M/S TRDP HAPPY WORLD PVT. LTD v. SHRI BALAJI CHEMFOOD INDUSTRIES

16 Apr 2025 · Amit Bansal, J. · 2025:DHC:2788
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to the plaintiff for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off due to the defendant's adoption of identical marks and failure to contest the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement copyright infringement passing off permanent injunction

Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH v. Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks and Anr

16 Apr 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:2778

The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of patent claims at the appellate stage and remanded the patent application for fresh examination, setting aside the Controller's rejection order.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent amendment appellate stage patents act 1970 novelty

Marelli Europe S.P.A. v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs

16 Apr 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:2789

The Delhi High Court set aside a patent rejection order for lack of inventive step due to absence of reasoned analysis and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with proper application of mind.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant inventive step patent application rejection reasoned order natural justice

Union of India v. JWO Dinesh Chandra Dobriyal

16 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2691-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type II, affirming the presumption of attribution to military service unless rebutted by clear reasons from the Release Medical Board.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension military service Release Medical Board presumption of attribution

Sundeep Kumar Verma v. Archana Singh

16 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2724

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's order restoring a suit dismissed for default, holding that sufficient cause was shown for non-appearance and delay.

civil appeal_dismissed restoration of suit Order IX Rule 9 CPC condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act

Bhavna Lather v. State of NCT of Delhi

16 Apr 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:2616
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of accused directors in a large-scale real estate fraud case, holding that issuance of non-bailable warrants and proclamation proceedings under Section 82 CrPC generally disentitle accused from anticipatory bail except in exceptional circumstances.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail non-bailable warrant Section 82 CrPC economic offences

Praveen Jindal v. Ramesh Chand Gupta

16 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2955-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of an appeal under Section 36(3) of the Arbitration Act with liberty to challenge the award under Section 34, granting six weeks to deposit 50% of the award amount.

civil appeal_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 36(3) Section 34 arbitral award

Vinay Jain v. Rakesh Jain & Ors.

16 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3990-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition and upheld that under Order XVIII Rule 1 CPC, the plaintiff must lead evidence first unless the defendant admits material facts, holding the appeal maintainable under the Commercial Courts Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XVIII Rule 1 CPC Order XV-A CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015 Right to begin evidence

Ram Kishor Arora v. Rohit Verma & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2507

The Delhi High Court suo moto corrected a typographical error in its earlier order by substituting 'possession' with 'position' and issued a corrigendum.

other other typographical error correction suo moto corrigendum

Brij Bhushan v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi

15 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5664
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of dowry harassment and abetment of suicide charges due to lack of specific evidence proving cruelty or instigation, emphasizing the need for clear mens rea and caution against misuse of Section 498-A IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC Section 306 IPC dowry harassment abetment of suicide

Amit Verma & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:2658

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita settlement agreement Section 498A IPC