Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Vinay Mittal & Anr. v. Bank of Baroda & Ors.

15 Apr 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:2720

Delhi High Court quashed Look Out Circulars issued against guarantors by public sector banks under a now-invalid administrative guideline, affirming the fundamental right to travel abroad and restricting arbitrary issuance of LOCs.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circular Office Memorandum 27.10.2010 public sector banks guarantors

Ashok Rani v. Kashmiri Lal

15 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2718

The Delhi High Court held that merits of an amendment application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC should not be adjudicated at the amendment stage and allowed the petitioner to amend the plaint to include reliefs of declaration of title and possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings merits of amendment probate proceedings

Parveen Travels P Ltd v. Central Board of Trustees

15 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2719

The Delhi High Court directed the EPFO authorities to consider the petitioner's application for waiver of damages under the EPF Scheme, 1952 by a speaking order after personal hearing, while denying interim relief and allowing the petitioner to pursue other remedies.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition mandamus Employees' Provident Fund Scheme 1952 waiver of damages

M/S Brijbihari Concast Pvt. Ltd. v. Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Meerut Zonal Unit

15 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2653-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to operate its provisionally attached bank account subject to maintaining a minimum balance, emphasizing the need to balance revenue protection with taxpayer rights in GST provisional attachments.

administrative petition_allowed Significant provisional attachment Section 83 CGST Act GST evasion show cause notice

M/S IMPRESSIVE DATA SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER (APPEALS-I), CENTRAL TAX GST, DELHI

15 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2651-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act cannot be waived by the court and dismissed the petition seeking such waiver.

tax petition_dismissed Significant pre-deposit Section 107(6) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Input Tax Credit

Aseem Rajpal v. Divya Duggal

15 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2703

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim maintenance order of Rs. 15,000 per month to a wife under the DV Act, rejecting the husband's challenge to the income assessment and entitlement despite her unemployment and claimed expenses.

family petition_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005 income assessment unemployment

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Deepak Puri & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2701

The Delhi High Court dismissed CBI's petition seeking Look Out Circulars against accused in a white-collar crime case, holding that the conditions for LOC issuance under amended guidelines were not met.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Look Out Circular Section 482 CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act Indian Penal Code

Rinku Kanjar v. Union of India

15 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2629-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of a candidate's CISF recruitment candidature for failing to possess a valid Heavy Motor Vehicle driving license on the cut-off date, rejecting reliance on a learner's license and suspended licenses obtained by fraud.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant driving license learner's license cut-off date CISF recruitment

Suraj Prakash Arora & Ors. v. Roshanara Club Limited & Ors.

15 Apr 2025 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2025:DHC:2555

The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction to entertain suits on company oppression and mismanagement matters triable by NCLT under Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, and rejected the plaint at the threshold.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Section 430 Companies Act 2013 NCLT jurisdiction Civil court jurisdiction Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Rajender Singh v. Town Vending Committee Through Chairperson & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2604-DB

The Delhi High Court directed inclusion of the petitioner in the vendor survey under the 2019 Scheme and ordered consideration of alternate vending site allotment based on seniority despite the original site being declared a non-vending zone.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Street Vendors Protection Scheme 2019 Town Vending Committee vending site allotment seniority of vendors

Aarti v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2603-DB

The Delhi High Court directed NDMC to verify and allow the petitioner, wife of a deceased recognized street vendor, to participate in the vendor survey and substitute her name in place of her husband’s in accordance with law.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 vendor succession writ petition vendor survey

Kamla Thadani alias Sona Thadani v. Ashok Thadani & Ors.

15 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2642

The High Court directed the Trial Court to decide on the admissibility of documents introduced through a witness before permitting further cross-examination, emphasizing procedural fairness in civil trial evidence.

civil other Procedural admissibility of documents Order VII Rule 14(2) CPC cross-examination possession suit

M/S GLOBAL SALES INDIA & ANR. v. AMIT SHARMA

15 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2640

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to the extent of directing the trial court to proceed disregarding an additional acknowledged invoice, emphasizing procedural rigour and non-prejudice in commercial recovery suits.

civil appeal_allowed commercial suit recovery suit additional document Order XI Rules 1 & 2 CPC

Sparsh Dhir v. Esha Dhir

15 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2638

The High Court granted the petitioner a final opportunity to file his income affidavit and be heard on the Section 24 application, subject to payment of costs, thereby balancing procedural compliance with substantive justice in matrimonial proceedings.

family petition_dismissed Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 24 income affidavit non-cooperation

Kashyapi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Anr v. K.D.K. Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and Anr

15 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2637

The High Court set aside the trial court's order allowing amendment of plaint without hearing the defendants and directed fresh hearing in accordance with natural justice.

civil appeal_allowed amendment of plaint opportunity of hearing principles of natural justice trial court

Falcon Licensing Limited v. PRI Enterprises Private Limited & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:2592

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove a trademark registered in bad faith and non-use, affirming prior user rights and condemning trademark squatting under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark registration bad faith prior user rights trademark squatting

Pawan Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)

15 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2578

The Delhi High Court held that a warning punishment for overstaying furlough does not bar granting subsequent furlough, emphasizing the reformatory purpose of furlough and the petitioner's prior good conduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant furlough warning punishment overstay prisoner rights

Manjula v. State of NCT Delhi

15 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2577
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Anticipatory bail granted to accused under Section 20 NDPS Act due to her absence during raid and prima facie irregularities in investigation documents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail NDPS Act Section 20 NDPS intermediate quantity

J. G’S DEPARTMENTAL STORE v. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 60(1)

15 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:2562-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for AY 2017-18 as it exceeded the scope of the notice under Section 148A(b), emphasizing the need for procedural fairness and opportunity to respond.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A Reopening of assessment Demonetization period

FDC LIMITED v. PALSONS DERMA PRIVATE LIMITED

15 Apr 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:2576
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of the prior user plaintiff restraining the defendant from using a deceptively similar trademark, emphasizing the superiority of prior user rights over registered rights in passing off actions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off prior user rights trademark infringement interim injunction