Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

T.R. Chadha and Co. LLP v. Satyanarayan Jhunjhunwala & Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4450
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the trial court's finding that the plaint discloses a cause of action but remanded the issue of whether the suit is barred under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act for trial court adjudication.

civil other Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action Section 31 Specific Relief Act written instrument

State, NCT of Delhi v. Shiv Shankar

24 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5267

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused due to non-recovery of the weapon and material contradictions in the prosecution evidence, applying the benefit of doubt principle.

criminal appeal_dismissed non-recovery of weapon benefit of doubt grievous injury Section 342 IPC

Minoti Bahri v. Anish Handa & Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3002

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a Non-Executive Director for alleged company offences due to lack of specific allegations of her involvement or criminal intent.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Non-Executive Director vicarious liability summoning order Section 420 IPC

Pankaj Arora v. Anil Kumar Bansal & Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2965

The Delhi High Court held that Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 bars civil revision petitions against interlocutory orders of Commercial Courts, dismissing the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 8 Commercial Courts Act Section 115 CPC interlocutory orders

AI Employees Pensioners Welfare Association v. Air India Limited & Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2953

The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking pension benefits from Air India Limited post-privatization, holding that the company ceased to be a State instrumentality and is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 jurisdiction Air India privatization Instrumentality of State Writ petition maintainability

Murti Devi v. State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission & Anr.

24 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2904

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of a pending execution petition enforcing a consumer award, deleting the State Commission as a party and emphasizing adherence to Supreme Court guidance for timely execution.

consumer other Significant execution petition consumer dispute redressal commission expeditious disposal compensation claim

M/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD v. SMT. SUKHPAL KAUR & ORS.

24 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:2825
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging the compensation amount in a motor accident claim, holding that the deceased's income must be assessed based on properly authenticated evidence and that review petitions cannot be used to re-open settled issues.

civil petition_dismissed Significant motor accident claim income tax returns compensation assessment review petition

Mr. Harjeet Singh & Anr. v. Ansal Plaza Owners Welfare Association & Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:2884

The High Court set aside an interim order restraining a newly elected Executive Committee from managing an association, holding that such restraint requires prima facie satisfaction of maintainability and the trinity test, and directed continuation of management pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction association election trinity test maintainability of suit

Shri Ganga Ram Sharma v. Smt. Shashi Jain

24 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2897

The Delhi High Court kept arrest warrants against a judgment debtor in abeyance upon his undertaking to pay the outstanding decretal amount within two months.

civil petition_allowed execution proceedings arrest warrant judgment debtor decretal amount

Saleem Ahmad v. Sudarshan Kumar Joshi & Anr.

24 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2899

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interference with the suit's dismissal without trial, directing the petitioner to file a Regular First Appeal instead.

civil petition_dismissed supervisory jurisdiction dismissal of suit framing of issues recording of evidence

Brushman India Ltd. v. M/S Framework Interiors

24 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2902

The Delhi High Court waived additional costs imposed for non-compliance in execution proceedings, directing the judgment debtor company to file a fresh affidavit of assets to ensure compliance with Court orders.

civil appeal_allowed execution proceedings Order XXI Rule 41 CPC affidavit of assets cost imposition

Shiv Raj Singh v. Preeti Jain

24 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2903

The Delhi High Court allowed consolidation of two civil suits relating to the same property for recording evidence to promote judicial efficiency and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

civil petition_allowed consolidation of suits recording of evidence judicial economy Article 227 Constitution of India

Central Warehousing Corporation v. Govt. of India

24 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2863-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Government’s notification prohibiting contract labour at CWC’s ICD Patparganj, holding that the statutory requirements under Section 10(2) of the Contract Labour Act were duly complied with and there was no error of law or jurisdiction.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 Section 10 prohibition contract labour Central Advisory Contract Labour Board

Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Mr. Milind Jain, Mr. Ankit Handa, Mr. Ankur Vyas and Mr. Saksham Dhingra v. Union of India & Anr

24 Apr 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:2910-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a drug safety notification mandating warning labels applies prospectively only and directed petitioners to comply with labeling for future stocks while protecting pre-notification stocks from coercive action.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 26A Section 28B statutory notification

Snehlata & Anr. v. Union of India

24 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3102

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation, holding that the deceased was not a bona fide passenger at the time of death and the incident did not qualify as an untoward incident under the Railways Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 Section 124-A compensation claim

Parmeshwari Devi v. The State & Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:2862
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Probate Court's dismissal of probate for a Will due to failure to prove attestation by both witnesses as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and rejected the appellant's request for additional evidence at the appellate stage.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 63 Section 68 Indian Evidence Act Will execution

Ex Lt Col Prawin Kumar v. Union of India & Ors

24 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2920-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as misconceived because the petitioner was already pursuing the same relief before the Armed Forces Tribunal.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition Armed Forces Tribunal parallel proceedings misconceived petition

Naveen Vedi v. Union of India & Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:4849-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Confirming Authority to decide the statutory petition under Section 117 of the BSF Act on merits, quashing its prior order that relegated the petitioner to the Security Force Court without such decision.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Confirming Authority Section 117 BSF Act Security Force Court statutory petition

Aditi Chatterjee v. Jawaharlal Nehru University and Ors.

23 Apr 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:3373

The Delhi High Court quashed disciplinary proceedings and fine imposed on a JNU student for violating natural justice principles by denying her a fair opportunity to defend herself.

administrative petition_allowed Significant natural justice audi alteram partem disciplinary proceedings Jawaharlal Nehru University

BMI GROUP DANMARK APS v. THE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS AND ANOTHER

23 Apr 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:3174

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against patent refusal, holding that non-analogous prior art cannot be used to deny inventive step and the claimed combination in the sealing web patent was novel and non-obvious.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant inventive step patent refusal analogous prior art non-analogous prior art