Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Riyaz Ahmed Trade Name R. M. Enterprises v. Proper Officer SGST Ward -24 Zone -1

23 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3011-DB

Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication order due to non-communication of show cause notice and directed fresh adjudication with opportunity to be heard, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 73 CGST Act Section 168A CGST Act show cause notice

M/S. PASHMEEN OVERSEASTHROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR GAGANDEEP SINGH v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GST AND ORS

23 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3050-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for denial of hearing and granted the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act show cause notice ex-parte order

Aviral Technology Solutions and Telecom Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3065-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax adjudication order passed without hearing the petitioner, directing fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of time-extension notifications under CGST Act to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Act Section 168A CGST Act show cause notice

M/S CRAYONS NET SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

23 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3029-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to non-communication of show cause notice and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant show cause notice personal hearing Section 73 CGST Act Section 168A CGST Act

Vardhman Trade Linkers v. Union of India

23 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3059-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to denial of fair hearing caused by non-visibility of show cause notices on the portal, directing fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Act Section 168A CGST Act show cause notice

K.S. Impex Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Anr.

23 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3032-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication orders due to improper service of show cause notices and directed fresh adjudication with personal hearing, while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant show cause notice natural justice Section 73 CGST Act Section 168A CGST Act

Mahadev Industries v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3031-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper service of show cause notice and directed fresh adjudication after personal hearing, while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Section 168A CGST show cause notice

Ayodhya Singh v. Union of India

23 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:2792

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal’s rejection of compensation for death, holding that the claimant failed to prove the deceased was a bona fide passenger and that death resulted from an untoward railway incident.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 compensation claim bona fide passenger

Ex Sgt Onkar Misra v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2841-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an injury sustained by an Air Force personnel while performing mandated duties at his official residence, even on leave, is attributable to service entitling him to disability pension.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disability pension attributable to service Indian Air Force Show Cause Notice

Kuldeep v. Central Bureau of Investigation

23 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2837

Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused in a corruption case due to prima facie evidence and the necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail Prevention of Corruption Act custodial interrogation audio recordings

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4, New Delhi v. NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd.

23 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:2817-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that sale proceeds of fly ash utilized as per statutory environmental notifications do not constitute taxable income under the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant fly ash utilisation fund income tax Section 263 Income Tax Act Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

Tanuj Dhawan v. Sonica Singhi

23 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2882

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for additional visitation rights during past winter vacations and festivals as infructuous but allowed the petitioner to seek future visitation through a reasoned application under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

family petition_dismissed Section 26 Hindu Marriage Act visitation rights parenting time custody

Anju Tomar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

23 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:2896

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and restored a suit dismissed for non-prosecution, holding that professional misconduct by counsel and bona fide delay constitute sufficient cause under Order IX Rule 9 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order IX Rule 9 CPC restoration of suit sufficient cause non-prosecution

Sunmeet Singh v. Divyank Bose & Ors.

23 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2883

The High Court held that striking off defence under Order XV-A CPC requires mandatory prior notice and consideration of cause shown, setting aside the order passed without such notice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XV-A CPC striking off defence notice requirement show cause notice

Jyoti Behl v. Karan Jain & Anr

23 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2885

The Delhi High Court held that a pending Probate Petition does not automatically stay execution of a decree and that tentative observations on a Will's validity by the Executing Court do not prejudice Probate proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Execution Petition Specific Performance Probate Petition Will validity

Javed Malik v. Samson Fredric

23 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2886

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte appellate order due to defective service of summons and directed the appellate court to hear the appeal afresh after granting the petitioner a proper opportunity to defend.

civil appeal_allowed Significant service of summons ex-parte proceeding Order IX Rule 13 CPC Section 151 CPC

Union of India & Ors. v. Rama Chandra Dhal

23 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2946-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II and Primary Hypertension, affirming the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction in reviewing factual findings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal

Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr

23 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2888

The High Court allowed the petitioner to conduct further cross-examination of the defendant's witness after finding that no actual cross-examination occurred despite the trial court's order indicating otherwise.

civil appeal_allowed cross-examination witness trial court order-sheet

Jitendra Sharma v. Geetika Sharma

23 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2890

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the trial court's order permitting the respondent to place relevant additional documents on record in a suit alleging bigamous marriage.

civil appeal_dismissed bigamous marriage additional documents Family Court judgment legal notice

Jatinder Singh v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

23 Apr 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:2856

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against the petitioner holding that mere inadvertent possession of live cartridges without conscious knowledge does not constitute an offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act conscious possession inadvertent possession quashing of FIR