Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

The National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Amarjeet Kaur & Anr.

29 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3124

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded to the widow of a deceased driver, holding the insurer liable despite the registered owner's prior death and non-transfer of the insurance policy.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act employer-employee relationship insurance policy renewal deceased registered owner

Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Pranzull Verma

29 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3101

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that the respondent's claim was not time-barred and the award did not suffer from any patent illegality or jurisdictional error.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 37(1)(c) Limitation Works contract

Mohd. Saleem v. Jaspreet Puri

29 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3175

The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the written statement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to incorporate subsequent events including a separate suit and criminal complaint, imposing costs on the petitioner.

civil appeal_allowed Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings specific performance commercial suit

Sh. Rajesh Kumar & Anr. v. Smt. Dharam Kumari @ Pooja

29 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3178

The Delhi High Court allowed defendants to clear unpaid costs and granted them an opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness, emphasizing procedural fairness and discretion in civil trials.

civil petition_allowed Significant cost order cross-examination Section 151 CPC amendment of written statement

Suresh Babu v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

29 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3206-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking protection from eviction due to the petitioner's suppression of prior orders and litigation history, holding that such concealment renders the petition not maintainable.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant writ petition suppression of facts unclean hands interim order

Hansraj Beneewal & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3118-DB

The writ petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed as withdrawn after their grievance was resolved.

other petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal dismissal High Court of Delhi

Dinesh v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3109-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to constitute a Medical Board to assess the petitioner's medical category within six weeks, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Medical Board medical category writ petition constitution of Medical Board

Dimple Gupta v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

29 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3130

The Delhi High Court allowed a natural guardian's appeal permitting the sale of minor children's property shares under statutory provisions, emphasizing the welfare of minors and safeguarding sale proceeds.

family appeal_allowed Significant natural guardian minor's property Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Guardianship and Wards Act

Shiv Mohan & Ors. v. Umed Singh & Ors.

29 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3192

The Delhi High Court disposed of a revision petition against setting aside of suit abatement, directing parties to avoid unnecessary adjournments and ensuring expeditious trial.

civil other Section 115 CPC Order XXII Rule 9 CPC abatement of suit revision petition

R.C. Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 32, Delhi

29 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3203-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessments under Section 153C requires incriminating material bearing on income for relevant years, and mere seizure of accounted goods is insufficient to sustain such proceedings.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 153C Income Tax Act incriminating material search and seizure limitation period

Shri Krishna Sales v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others

29 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3150-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST demand order due to ineffective communication of the show cause notice and directed fresh adjudication with personal hearing, subject to the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of extension notifications.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST Act Section 168A show cause notice effective communication

State Bank of India & Ors. v. Ajay Kuhar Gulati

29 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3092-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the quashing of departmental inquiry for failure to consider document relevance and remanded the matter for expeditious fresh adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry relevance of documents condonation of delay quashing of inquiry

Union of India & Anr. v. Sh. Raj Pal Singh Rana & Ors.

29 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3045-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order directing pension benefits based on combined service, emphasizing that all pleas must be raised before the Tribunal and refusing to interfere without error on record.

administrative appeal_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal pension benefits combined service Department of Telecommunication

Saroj Mehndi v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 49.1 & Anr.

29 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3043-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued beyond the prescribed limitation period, after applying statutory extensions and judicial exclusions, is invalid and quashed the impugned notice.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act limitation period Section 148A procedure Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment) Act 2020

M/S Diploma Engineers v. Union of India and Ors.

29 Apr 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:3293

The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of a contractor’s renewal application for lack of proper notice and natural justice, directing reconsideration in light of pending arbitration proceedings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant renewal of enlistment C-Class Contractor Show Cause Notice natural justice

Jitender & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

29 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3048

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute due to compromise and dissolution of marriage, holding that criminal proceedings need not continue when parties have settled amicably.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Capital Ventures Pvt Ltd v. Registrar of Trademarks

29 Apr 2025 · Amit Bansal

The Delhi High Court held that the word 'PARLIAMENT' is a common noun not prohibited under the Emblems and Names Act, allowing registration of trade marks containing it and setting aside refusals under Section 9(2)(d) of the Trade Marks Act.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Emblems and Names Act, 1950 Section 9(2)(d) PARLIAMENT mark

Shabana v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

29 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:3254-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious onboarding of IT intermediaries onto the SAHYOG portal for lawful data disclosure and content removal, while deferring adjudication of X Corp.'s challenge to the portal's validity.

administrative other Significant SAHYOG portal Information Technology Act 2000 Section 79(3)(b) Section 69A

Meenakshi Arya v. Shalini Rajpal & Anr.

29 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3180-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a landlord can terminate a commercial lease after the lock-in period by giving two months' notice, and damages for unauthorized occupation apply only after the full tenancy term expires, setting aside daily damages awarded from suit filing date.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant commercial tenancy lock-in period termination notice unauthorized occupation

Naveen Vedi v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3033-DB

The Delhi High Court refused to stay disciplinary proceedings before the General Security Force Court pending a statutory appeal under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, while granting liberty to the petitioner to raise all issues before the GSFC.

administrative petition_dismissed General Security Force Court Section 117 Border Security Force Act disciplinary proceedings stay of proceedings