Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Hindustan Construction Company Ltd v. Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Ltd

07 May 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:3533

The Delhi High Court held that the Court under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act cannot decide res judicata issues and must appoint an arbitrator, leaving such substantive defenses to arbitration.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 res judicata appointment of arbitrator arbitral award

Mohd Ashqin v. The Principal DAV Public School and Anr

07 May 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:3526

The Delhi High Court directed a school to admit a child allotted a seat under the EWS/DG category despite delay, affirming the statutory right to free and compulsory elementary education under the RTE Act.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Right to Education EWS/DG/CWSN category Admission to school Draw of lots

Canara Bank & Ors. v. Raj Kumar Wadhera & Ors.

07 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3508-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed Canara Bank's appeal and upheld the direction to refund amounts deducted without notice from an employee claiming disability, emphasizing the requirement of due process before recovery.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disability certificate Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 unauthorized leave recovery of amounts

Pooja Wasal v. Ramesh Grover & Ors.

07 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:3507
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the plaint in a partition suit disclosing ancestral joint family property and coparcenary rights cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC without trial, as the nature of property is a triable issue.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC joint Hindu family coparcenary rights Hindu Succession Act 1956

Rahul Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

07 May 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:3387

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a criminal trial, holding that mere allegations of bias without cogent evidence do not justify transfer under Sections 407 and 408 CrPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant transfer petition reasonable apprehension of bias Section 407 CrPC Section 408 CrPC

Kanta Goswami v. Roshan Arora

07 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3457

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that an oral tenancy is not barred by law and the suit discloses a cause of action.

civil petition_dismissed oral tenancy Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action recovery of possession

M/S A. G. OVERSEAS PVT LTD & ORS. v. CHETAN DASS

07 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3456
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court allowed defendants to file their written statement to an amended plaint despite the Trial Court striking off their defense, emphasizing proper summons and procedural fairness under the Commercial Courts Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC Order 8 Rule 1 CPC

Sh. Gautam Sethi & Anr. v. Sh. Saurabh Singal & Anr.

07 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3455

The Delhi High Court restored the defendants' defence in a possession and rent recovery suit subject to deposit of arrears and costs, allowing them to participate further in the trial.

civil appeal_allowed restoration of defence Order XV-A CPC arrears of rent mesne profits

M/S CHAMBAL FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED v. ARUN TIWARI PROPRIETOR OF M/S TIWARI TRADERS CO.

07 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3454

The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a suit dismissed in default due to procedural lapses, emphasizing the court's discretion to balance procedural compliance with substantive justice.

civil appeal_allowed restoration of suit dismissal in default substituted service Order XXXVII CPC

Shishu Pal Chauhan v. Sudesh Tyagi & Anr.

07 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3453

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw petitions seeking impleadment after he re-transferred his interest and withdrew his claim in the pending suits.

civil petition_allowed Order I Rule 10 CPC impleadment withdrawal of petition interest in suit property

Mukesh Chauhan v. Mange Ram Sharma & Ors.

07 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3451

The Delhi High Court held that objections to execution must be decided before transferring execution proceedings or issuing Transfer Certificates, setting aside a premature transfer order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Execution Petition Objection to Execution Transfer Certificate Jurisdiction

Monu Dhingra & Ors. v. New Delhi Municipal Council

07 May 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3425

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 70 of the NDMC Act, citizens have the right to timely access and obtain extracts of the municipal Assessment List, including properties other than their own, and directed NDMC to comply accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Significant New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 Section 70 NDMC Act Assessment List Right to inspect

Rakesh Kumar Gulati v. Directorate of Enforcement

07 May 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:3390
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to an external auditor accused under the PMLA, emphasizing the constitutional right to personal liberty and the necessity of expeditious trial of predicate offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act bail external auditor liability predicate offence

Paramjeet v. Directorate of Enforcement

07 May 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:3389
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to Paramjeet Sharma in a PMLA money laundering case, emphasizing the right to speedy trial under Article 21 despite stringent bail conditions under the PMLA.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA bail Article 21 Constitution of India

Balwant Singh & Anr. v. Aruna Vijay Singh & Anr.

07 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3423

The Delhi High Court held that directors cannot be personally held liable or subjected to non-bailable warrants in execution of a consumer decree against their company without proper legal basis and allowed their petition to stay such warrants pending their appearance.

civil petition_allowed Significant consumer complaint execution petition non-bailable warrant personal liability

Yasin @ Gilli v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

07 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3410

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a murder case due to lack of strong prima facie evidence and hostile prosecution witness.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 302 IPC hostile witness recovery of weapon

Shamim @ Munna v. State of NCT of Delhi

07 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3421

The Delhi High Court granted parole to a prisoner on medical grounds despite prior bail jumping, subject to bond, surety, and address verification.

criminal petition_allowed parole bail jumping medical grounds Section 174A IPC

Ramesh @ Dudhiya v. State NCT of Delhi

07 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3422

The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary punishment against a prisoner for possession of tobacco in jail based on his written confession despite absence of CCTV footage.

criminal petition_dismissed prisoner confession possession of tobacco in jail punishment ticket disciplinary proceedings

Jyoti v. State

07 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3403

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in an economic offences case, holding that the dispute was essentially civil and no prima facie criminality was established to deny bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offences cheating criminal breach of trust

Nikita @ Rinki v. Ajay Khandelwal

07 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3368-DB

The Delhi Family Court rightly held territorial jurisdiction over the divorce petition as the parties last resided together within its jurisdiction, and the appeal challenging this was dismissed.

family appeal_dismissed territorial jurisdiction Family Courts Act, 1984 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Order VII Rule 10 CPC