Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
M/S MIRZA INTERNATIONAL LTD v. M/S GIRDHARS BIR SHOPPE
The Delhi High Court decreed a suit based on a voluntary out-of-court settlement acknowledging trademark ownership and directed refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.
M/S MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD. v. M/S SAFVOLTS SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court accepted a voluntary settlement reached through court-annexed mediation involving trademark and corporate name disputes, decreed the suit accordingly, and granted refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.
Rainbow Technologies, Inc. v. Parag Shah and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed a civil suit for non-prosecution and default due to the plaintiff's failure to file a formal settlement agreement and appear in court after a decade-long delay.
UOI AND ORS. v. SANTOSH ARORA
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing the release of family pension with interest to the widow due to employer’s inaction in including her name in the Pension Payment Order.
Surinder Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a tender evaluation system giving greater weight to technical criteria over price, dismissing the petition challenging it as arbitrary or unfair.
Rajeev Saumitra v. Maya Chaudhary
The court decreed a suit declaring the defendant not to be the CEO after her resignation was accepted and granted permanent injunction restraining her from occupying the office or interfering with the company’s business.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Shri Raj Kumar @ Raju
The Delhi High Court upheld a compensation award for permanent disability without deducting personal expenses, clarifying that such deductions apply only in death claims under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Premadhar Memorial Charitable Trust v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse if the Section 6 declaration is not made within one year of the Section 4 notification, quashing the delayed acquisition declaration.
Roop Chand and Others v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Satnam Singh and Others v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal case under Section 308 IPC based on a family settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Dayachand v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking possession of a rehabilitative allotment after a long delay but directed refund of the deposited license fee with interest.
Shan Mohammad and Others v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between parties at an early trial stage.
Makhan Singh and Others v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal case under Section 308 IPC on the basis of an amicable family settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Masroof Ahmad and Others v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Anirudh Arora and Others v. State of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
SAIL ISP v. M/S ALPHA STEEL INDUSTRIES & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that payments in execution proceedings must be adjusted first against interest, then costs, and only thereafter against principal, setting aside contrary lower court orders.
P K Wadhwa v. S C Mehta & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a judgment debtor is entitled to lead evidence in execution proceedings to establish ownership of attached property and set aside orders denying such opportunity based on erroneous findings.
Trilok Chand Sharma v. Suresh Devi
The Delhi High Court ordered transfer of four civil suits involving common issues from different courts at Tis Hazari to a single court at District Court, Dwarka, on joint request of parties to avoid conflicting judgments.
Ashok Kumar v. Kusumnagpal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and directed the trial court to refer the parties again to mediation for amicable settlement.
CM Prakash Solanki v. ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after dismissal of the Suit Application, directing the respondent to provide a Statement of Account and consider the petitioner’s reasonable repayment proposal.