Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
Kanachur Islamic Education Trust v. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, the MCI is not required to grant an opportunity to rectify deficiencies found during physical inspection and the Central Government may accept the MCI’s negative recommendation without a fresh hearing after the second inspection.
Union of India & Ors. v. M. A. Haque
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of a government employee to full reimbursement of medical expenses incurred at an empanelled private hospital after referral by a government hospital, overruling strict application of CGHS package rates.
Harminder Singh Koghar v. Ramnath Exports Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petitions holding that bona fide requirement for residential use under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act includes foreseeable need and that the landlord's ownership and entitlement to eviction were established, setting aside the dismissal by the Rent Controller.
Harminder Singh Koghar v. Ramnath Exports Private Ltd.
The High Court allowed the landlord's revision petitions holding that bona fide requirement for residential use by a non-resident Indian landlord is established even if business ventures are in progress and uncompleted, and dismissed tenants' claims of sale negotiations negating such requirement.
B K Bhagat v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court held that the Estate Officer lacked jurisdiction to renew a license unilaterally, set aside the impugned orders based on that, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Khalid Imam v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking allotment of a medical seat to a candidate who failed to fill choices within the prescribed online counselling period, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural rules in computerized admissions.
Inderjit Mehta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that re-tendering was unjustified when the lowest bidder was ineligible and directed acceptance of the petitioner’s valid lowest bid and award of contract.
Thomas Karketta v. State through Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under the NDPS Act due to total non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 42 and failure to involve independent public witnesses during search and seizure.
Ramdoot Merchandise Private Limited v. Glorious Electronics India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all concerned parties had given written consent or no objection and secured creditors were paid in full.
DCM Engineering Limited v. DCM Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the meeting of transferor company's equity shareholders and directing meetings of creditors and transferee company's shareholders to approve a Scheme of Amalgamation.
Parasabha Construction Private Limited v. Sanatan Autoplast Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies where all stakeholders had given written consent.
Union of India v. M/S N N Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting a contractor bonus for early completion after excluding employer-attributable delays from the stipulated contract period.
Rohtash Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition holding that acquisition proceedings completed decades ago with possession taken and compensation paid cannot be challenged as lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.
Sabir Ali v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 20 NDPS Act, ruling that police testimony on recovery is reliable despite absence of independent witnesses when statutory procedures are complied with and reasonable efforts to involve public witnesses are made.
B K Bhagat v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court set aside an unauthorized Estate Officer order renewing a license for NDMC premises, dismissed related appeals as infructuous, and allowed fresh adjudication on merits.
Neelam Nagpal and Anr v. Syndicate Bank and Ors
The Delhi High Court set aside the default dismissal of appeals by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal due to non-appearance caused by a Bar Association's call for abstinence, remanding the matters for hearing on merits after an apology was tendered.
Mohd. Saidab @ Ajaj v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant due to doubtful identification and unreliable recovery evidence, emphasizing the need for corroboration of first-time in-court identification and proper proof of recovery under Section 27 of the Evidence Act.
Northern Railway v. M/S Pioneer Publicity Corporation Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application for condonation of delay in re-filing a Section 34 arbitration petition, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation and the necessity of a satisfactory explanation for delay.
Surender Kumar & Anr v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a family property dispute under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Subhash Rana & Ors. v. The State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable mediated settlement, applying the principles of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.