Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

Saurabh Saxena & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

31 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7131

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a neighbourly dispute based on a genuine compromise, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR compromise amicable settlement

Hitender @ Jitender Sharma & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

31 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7135

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, reaffirming the High Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to end criminal proceedings in such cases to serve the ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute mediated settlement

Ashutosh v. State Govt. NCT of Delhi & Anr.

31 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7133

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles governing exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement compoundable offences

Himanshu Sharma & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

31 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7136

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, applying the principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Santosh Ravin & Ors. v. State & Anr.

31 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7141

The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Aslam Khan & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

31 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7140

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act and IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Shanti Devi & Anr. v. State & Anr.

31 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7139

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324 and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Chirag Gupta & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

31 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7138

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, emphasizing the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute mediated settlement

S C Aggarwal v. Geeta Flexo Grevure Ltd.

31 Aug 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7137

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of criminal complaint and summoning order under Sections 409, 467, 468, and 471 IPC, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC should not be exercised when an effective remedy exists before the trial court.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal complaint pre-charge evidence prima facie case

Abhinav Kumar Saxena and Others v. The State and Another

31 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7129

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal case under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, affirming the High Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to quash such proceedings in the interest of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute non-compoundable offence

Raj Kumar and Others v. State of NCT Delhi and Another

31 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7130

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Saadullah and Others v. The State NCT of Delhi and Another

31 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7128

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498A IPC

Ritesh Alias Ashu and Others v. The State NCT of Delhi and Another

31 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7124
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 324/342/34 IPC and Arms Act based on an amicable settlement between neighbors, applying its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC while imposing costs on petitioners.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences settlement between parties

Amir Raja and Others v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi and Others

31 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7125

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC while emphasizing caution in serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences Section 308 IPC

Khubaib Azam and Others v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi and Others

31 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7126

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties at an early stage, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 308 IPC

Mohd. Arif Khan & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

31 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7127

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute settlement

Sree Bhagwan v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

31 Aug 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7121

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving disputed ownership of property and allegations of forgery, emphasizing that disputed facts are to be resolved at trial.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 439 CrPC disputed property ownership forgery

Ramesh Chand v. Naresh Kumar @ Naresh Madan

31 Aug 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:7155

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of leave to defend to a tenant in an eviction petition based on the landlord’s bona fide requirement, holding that triable issues regarding dependency and accommodation sufficiency must be decided after trial.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction Delhi Rent Control Act leave to defend

Bhuttan v. State

31 Aug 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; R. K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:7147-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and failure to exclude accidental death, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of proof in last seen cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen evidence circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC

Rotary Club Delhi v. Union of India

31 Aug 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7094-DB

The Delhi High Court held that NGOs cannot be held liable to pay salaries for the period after project funding ceased merely because employees continued to report pursuant to an interim court order, applying the principle that no party shall suffer pecuniary loss due to the act of the court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant interim order work-charge employees project employment pecuniary liability