Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
B.S. Mor & Anr. v. Govt of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of applications to summon defense witnesses and admit civil suit pleadings in a trespass complaint, holding the civil suit irrelevant to the criminal case.
R K DAS v. THE SHO & ANR.
The Delhi High Court declined to quash an FIR under Section 420 IPC and directed the petitioner to seek compounding of the offence before the trial court upon repayment of the amount.
Sewa International v. Kalawati Mathrani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement, holding the plaintiff was not ready and willing to perform, and the suit was barred by limitation.
B.P. Shukla v. Atam Vishal Chadha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order directing removal of unauthorized balcony construction that blocked neighbor's ventilation, dismissing the petitioner's revision challenging the injunction.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that seniority of BSF Assistant Commandants promoted through LDCE must be fixed from the date of continuous appointment as per statutory rules, overruling claims based on the date of announcement of results.
Dilshad Ahmed & Anr v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
Manish Vats & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a bona fide mediated settlement, emphasizing the court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Om Prakash & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 147/148/149/452/506/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC while imposing costs.
Yogesh & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.
Urooj Ahmed @ Urooj Alvi & Ors. v. State NCT Govt of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 325, 452, 427, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principles under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice in a family dispute.
Gulshan Panjwani v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Brijesh & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement, emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.
Satish @ Dhaula v. State of NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to the accused in a serious attempt to murder case at the pre-trial stage due to risk of evidence tampering, with liberty to apply again after key evidence is recorded.
B.S. Mor v. Govt of NCT
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of defense applications to summon witnesses and admit civil suit pleadings in a criminal trespass case, holding such evidence irrelevant to the criminal proceedings.
Madhu Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a criminal FIR under multiple IPC sections upon amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Aero Club of India Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection maintaining status quo against eviction and recovery proceedings by the Airports Authority of India, subject to deposit, pending disposal of the writ petition challenging the demand notices.
H.K. Chadha v. Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the approval of a merger scheme, affirming that a shareholder is disqualified from being statutory auditor and rejecting malicious objections motivated by the appellant's removal.
Suresh Jindal v. Archana Agarwal
The Delhi High Court held that adverse observations by a trial court on a party's conduct in one proceeding do not prejudice pending appeals, directing the appellate court to decide the matter on its own merits.
Suresh Jindal v. Archana Agarwal
The Delhi High Court clarified that trial court observations on parties' conduct in matrimonial proceedings should not prejudice pending appeals, disposing of related petitions accordingly.
Kulbhushan Rai Bajaj v. M/S A.J.S Builders Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of Rs.91 lakhs with 18% interest and costs against builders for failure to deliver flats as per contractual obligation irrespective of project completion.