Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
Kuldip Singh v. Banarasi Dass
The Delhi High Court dismissed objections to execution of a 1984 decree for specific performance, affirming its executability under Supreme Court directions despite procedural and possession-related challenges.
Shankar Goswami v. Sarita Goswami
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's appeal, affirming that the plaintiff holding better title was entitled to possession and damages against a licensee occupying property without right.
S.K. Dhawan v. Union Bank of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a bank officer for denial of mandatory opportunity to submit written defence before enquiry under Regulation 6 of Union Bank of India Officers Employee’s Regulations, 1976.
New Delhi Municipal Council v. Budh Ram
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal’s award directing regularisation of a daily rated worker from the date juniors were regularised, rejecting claims for equal wages prior to that date and refusing to interfere under Article 226.
UMESH CHAND SHARMA v. BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD
The Delhi High Court directed restoration of electricity connection to the petitioner as an essential service without conferring property rights, emphasizing that denial of electricity cannot be based solely on disputed title or forged NOC allegations.
Sunny v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified the appellants' conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to voluntarily causing hurt under Section 324 IPC due to lack of intention to cause death.
Paramount Limited v. GAIL (India) Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of execution petitions with liberty to refile, deferring claims related to bank guarantee margin money and further interest pending appeal outcome.
Tekla Corporation v. Rajeswari Jayaraman & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC and decreed the suit in terms of the parties' settlement agreement, thereby disposing of the suit amicably.
Jagdish Mittar Sawhney v. Ash Want Kumar Sawhney
The Delhi High Court allowed the application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC and decreed the suit based on the amicable settlement between the parties.
Ashok Raghav v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd
Delhi High Court disposed of petitions directing transfer of electricity connection and refund of security deposits based on parties’ mutual agreement and compliance with formalities.
Aditi Gupta v. Colonel Mohan Lal Chandan & Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of two petitions after the parties amicably settled their dispute through mediation and recorded a binding settlement agreement.
Rajinder Mohan Malhotra v. Vice-Chairman, Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction of the DDA's Director (CL) to demand damages for unauthorized occupation as a lawful precondition for leasehold-to-freehold conversion and dismissed the writ petition challenging the same.
Ravinder Kumar Atri & Ors. v. The Registrar General, Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of amended service rules reducing promotion eligibility criteria, dismissing the petitioners' claim of arbitrariness and holding that new rules apply prospectively.
M/S INDIASIGN PVT LTD v. M/S AADRI ENTERTAINMENT & MEDIA WORKS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a voluntary settlement recorded in a Memorandum of Understanding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Bestochem Formulations(I) Limited v. Nitin Blaggan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court accepted a joint settlement between parties in a trademark suit under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, deleted a non-associated defendant, and decreed the suit accordingly.
Jai Kishan Aggarwal v. Suresh Chander & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of legal heirs and parties to a settlement agreement and decreed the partition suit in terms of the mediated settlement.
Sharad Maheshwari v. Ravi Malhotra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a voluntary settlement agreement reached through court-annexed mediation and directed refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.
M/S S. B. TRANSPORT COMPANY v. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA
Non-submission of earnest money deposit by a bidder not entitled to exemption is a fatal breach of tender conditions warranting cancellation of contract and awarding the contract to the next eligible bidder.
Usha International Limited v. Shriram Automative Products Ltd.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit as the parties had amicably settled their dispute through a written Deed of Settlement, leaving no issue for adjudication.
Susheel Abrol v. Rainbow Papers Ltd
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a voluntarily executed settlement agreement reached through mediation, binding the parties to its terms.