Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
Director of Income Tax v. M/s Ericsson Communications Ltd
The High Court held that no obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 195 arises on reversed book entries where no income chargeable to tax accrues to the non-resident payee.
Ajay v. Govt of NCT Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 406 and 498A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a genuine settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Bhawani Verma v. UOI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the COFEPOSA detention order against Deepak Verma, ruling that the delay was justified, subjective satisfaction was based on cogent material, and procedural safeguards were complied with.
Mohd Nafees Qureshi and Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC based on a settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in appropriate cases.
C.P. Dharmesh v. The Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ challenging the cost recovery of a flat, holding that the matter was finally adjudicated and cannot be re-opened through subsequent claims or writs.
Shri Raj Kumar & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Harpreet Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed investigation to conclude in cross FIRs arising from family disputes settled by a Family Settlement Deed, without immediate quashing, balancing justice and restoration of harmony.
Shazad Khan @ Chanda & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a landlord-tenant dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
Annie Nagaraja and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that denial of Permanent Commission to women SSC officers of Indian Navy after 14 years constitutes gender discrimination and directed grant of Permanent Commission with consequential benefits.
Joginder Singh Logani v. State (CBI)
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner under cheating and corruption charges based on a No Objection Certificate and settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
M/S KAPIS IMPESX PVT LTD v. VIPIN KOHLI & ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed the Sessions Court's order directing the complainant to deposit ₹16 lakhs by FDR due to lack of valid reasons.
Satya Prakash & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry-related FIR under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act based on a genuine mediated settlement between the parties, applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court for quashing criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes.
Harpreet Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions seeking quashing of cross FIRs based on a Family Settlement Deed, directing completion of investigation and allowing parties to pursue other remedies.
Harpreet Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition to quash FIR No. 1290/2014 based on affidavits of complainants supporting the petition and directed recording of supplementary statements and filing of final report.
Ratan Singh & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court declined to quash an FIR and summoning order under Section 306 IPC, holding that the petitioners must first seek discharge before the trial court, as an alternate efficacious remedy exists.
Arun Kumar v. State (NCT) of Delhi
Pre-arrest bail was denied to the petitioner accused of forgery and cheating under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC due to the gravity of offences and necessity of custodial interrogation.
Puneet Oberoi v. Nupur Saini & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement and compensation, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Amit Saigal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the basis of an amicable settlement, applying the principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Harender Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 448, 420, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles governing quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
Satshiv (Bharat) & Ors. v. M/S Indrus Business Development Thr Its Partners
The Delhi High Court held that a power of attorney holder with personal knowledge of business transactions is a competent witness for a partnership firm in a recovery suit, dismissing the appeal against the appellate court's decree.