Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

Mrs. Rekha Palli, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Poonam Singh, Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Mr. Nikhil Palli, Ms. Shruti Munjal & Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocates v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....

03 Sep 2015 · HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR; HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJ... · 2015:DHC:7286-DB

The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment in a writ petition filed by Surjit Singh Guleria and others challenging government actions, referencing a related case but without detailed reasoning or final orders in the provided text.

administrative other writ petition Union of India administrative law service matters

Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....

03 Sep 2015 · HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR; HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJ... · 2015:DHC:7280-DB

None. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....

03 Sep 2015 · HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR; HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJ... · 2015:DHC:7284-DB

The Delhi High Court heard a writ petition filed by government employees challenging administrative decisions of the Union of India, with the judgment delivered on September 3, 2015.

administrative other Writ Petition Union of India Administrative Law Delhi High Court

Mehkar Vati & Another v. Prakash Chandra Yadav

03 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:7282

The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil suit for default and non-prosecution due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear and prosecute the case.

civil appeal_dismissed dismissal for default non-prosecution withdrawal of suit plaintiffs' failure to appear

Indian Red Cross Society v. Shivani Adhikari

03 Sep 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:7287-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Red Cross Society to reconsider the respondent's claim for pay scale and seniority by passing a reasoned order after a personal hearing, considering all relevant office orders.

administrative other Significant regularization of employment office order pay scale seniority

Neelam Kapur v. Director of Education & Ors.

03 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:7274

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the petitioner’s removal as School Manager on grounds of academic mootness, clarifying that her honour and service remain unaffected despite cessation linked to retirement.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Manager removal School management Judicial economy Academic interest

Shri Babu Lal v. Delhi Development Authority

03 Sep 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:7273

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking allotment of an alternative plot by the DDA, holding that eligibility depends on application to and recommendation by the Land & Building Department under the prevailing policy at the time, and that the appellant failed to satisfy these conditions or implead necessary parties.

civil appeal_dismissed mandatory injunction alternative plot allotment Delhi Development Authority Land Acquisition Act Section 4

Sonam Yadav & Anr v. The State & Anr

03 Sep 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7276

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Sections 279/304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act based on settlement and absence of culpable negligence, emphasizing the Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC motor vehicle accident Section 279 IPC

Ruhee Gupta v. Amit Aggarwal & Anr

03 Sep 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7275

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted to the accused in a dowry harassment case, holding that no sufficient grounds existed to cancel bail under Section 439(2) CrPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant pre-arrest bail cancellation of bail Section 439(2) CrPC dowry harassment

Anup Kumar Gupta v. Surender Singh

03 Sep 2015 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:7277

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an ex-parte Labour Court award, holding that intentional avoidance of summons justifies upholding the award and that writ jurisdiction does not permit reappraisal of facts absent jurisdictional error.

labor petition_dismissed Significant ex-parte award service of summons Order IX Rule 13 CPC Labour Court

SUPAPORN PATSAK v. STATE

03 Sep 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:7278

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of a foreign national for possession and attempt to export commercial quantity heroin, affirming the statutory presumption of knowledge and rejecting minor sample discrepancies and challenges to witness credibility.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act conscious possession statutory presumption sample weight discrepancy

Vaishali v. College of Art & Anr

03 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:7272

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking to change BFA specialization, holding that courts will not interfere with university policies prohibiting internal migration between specializations after formal prohibition.

academic/educational petition_dismissed internal migration specialization change Bachelor of Fine Art academic policy

Narinder Singh & Ors. v. State & Ors.

02 Sep 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7238
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the principles governing inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Vinay Rai v. CBI

02 Sep 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7239

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order to proceed with trial under Sections 420, 471, and 120-B IPC, holding that the trial court must independently adjudicate based on the material on record.

criminal petition_dismissed trial court order Section 420 IPC Section 471 IPC Section 120-B IPC

Poonam @ Meenu v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

02 Sep 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:7240

The High Court refused to quash the FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC, holding that the petitioner must seek discharge before the trial court, as inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC is not to be exercised when alternate remedies exist.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR inherent jurisdiction discharge before trial

Vikas v. State

02 Sep 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:7243

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 397 IPC, holding that displaying a double-bladed knife during robbery constitutes 'use' of a deadly weapon even without causing injury.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery Section 392 IPC Section 397 IPC deadly weapon

Air India Ltd. v. Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities & Anr.

02 Sep 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:7245

The Delhi High Court upheld the Chief Commissioner's order directing Air India to restore the seniority and pay of a disabled employee transferred voluntarily, affirming the Commissioner's jurisdiction under the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 Chief Commissioner jurisdiction seniority fixation voluntary transfer

Pritpal Singh Gulati & Ors. v. M/S Jai Gajanan Enterprises Pvt. Ltd & Anr

02 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:7244

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal in a summary suit by granting conditional leave to defend upon deposit of the decretal amount and deleting individual directors from the suit, emphasizing the need to consider jurisdiction and proper party impleadment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant summary suit Order 37 CPC leave to defend corporate veil