Delhi High Court

80,866 judgments

Year:

S Rajagopal v. Union of India and Ors.

07 Sep 2015 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1794-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 46

The High Court held that disputes regarding entitlement to Ex-Serviceman status and ESM identity cards for retired armed forces personnel drawing pro-rata pension fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Armed Forces Tribunal, and the writ petition is not maintainable before the High Court.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Ex-Serviceman status Armed Forces Tribunal jurisdiction pro-rata pension Kendriya Sainik Board

SH VARUN CHAUDDHARY & ORS v. STATE OF NCT & ANR

05 Sep 2015 · P.S. Teji · 2015:DHC:8362

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 323, 509, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement inherent powers of High Court

Drabhaysadashivbapat v. Jaipaltayal

04 Sep 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:11995

The Delhi Rent Control Act and Delhi (Urban Areas) Tenancy Relief Act do not apply to the suit property in Sagarpur, which is governed by the Transfer of Property Act, leading to dismissal of the tenant's appeal against ejectment.

civil appeal_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Delhi (Urban Areas) Tenancy Relief Act, 1961 landlord-tenant relationship territorial applicability

Naresh Kumar & Anr v. Maha Singh

04 Sep 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:11994

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding possession and damages decreed in favor of the plaintiff based on a registered will demarcating property shares, rejecting the appellants' claim for partition.

civil appeal_dismissed registered will property possession partition licensee

Roshanlal Saini v. Central Board of Secondary Education

04 Sep 2015 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:11543

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking re-evaluation of AIPMT 2015 answer sheets as the petitioner failed to avail the prior opportunity to inspect and challenge the OMR sheets before result declaration.

administrative petition_dismissed AIPMT 2015 OMR answer sheet re-evaluation inspection opportunity

Commissioner of Income Tax -1 v. Agya Crowns & Tops Ltd.

04 Sep 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11432-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals against the ITAT's deletion of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) for inadmissible claims and nil income returns, finding no substantial question of law.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 271(1)(c) Section 115JB Penalty

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Groz Engineering Tools Pvt. Ltd.

04 Sep 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11429-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision treating royalty payments as deductible business expenses, rejecting Revenue's claim that the agreements were sham and the payments capital expenditure.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant royalty payments capital expenditure revenue expenditure Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Abhishek Vikram Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

04 Sep 2015 · S. P. Garg · 2015:DHC:11303

The High Court of Delhi dismissed the criminal petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel seeking permission to withdraw the petition.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural withdrawal of petition dismissal as withdrawn criminal miscellaneous case High Court of Delhi

Through: v. STATE & ORS

04 Sep 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:11283

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking cancellation of pre-arrest bail, holding that unsubstantiated allegations of threat do not justify withdrawal of bail.

criminal petition_dismissed pre-arrest bail cancellation of bail threat perception misuse of bail

Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi v. Atma Ram Properties P. Ltd.

04 Sep 2015 · S. Muralidhar; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11109-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that rental income from Scindia House is taxable as income from house property, allowing the Revenue's appeals for AYs 1990-91 and 1991-92 and dismissing the Assessee's appeals for subsequent years as withdrawn.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260 A Income from house property Income from business

V.P. Gupta v. Union of India & Others

04 Sep 2015 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:7348-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT’s rejection of a long-delayed service pay fixation claim, holding that delay and limitation bar the claim absent sufficient cause.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant delay and laches limitation service claim pay fixation

M/S DABUR (NEPAL) PVT. LIMITED v. M/S WOODWORTH TRADE LINKS PVT. LIMITED

04 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:7343

The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit by recording a settlement agreement under which the defendant agreed to pay Rs. 1.45 crores to the plaintiff in full and final settlement.

civil settled Settlement Agreement Compromise Civil Suit Disposal Full and Final Settlement

PHILIPS INDIA LTD v. SANT KRIPA APPLIANCES PVT LTD

04 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:7341

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw a suit alleging disparagement after the defendant ceased the alleged acts, while permitting the defendant to claim damages for litigation expenses.

civil appeal_dismissed withdrawal of suit disparaging representations damages for litigation expenses misconceived suit

R K Mishra v. Shashi

04 Sep 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:7342

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit subject to its maintainability.

civil appeal_allowed withdrawal of suit leave to withdraw fresh suit cause of action

Naveen Kumar v. Chairman, Delhi Transport Corporation

04 Sep 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:7344-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld termination of a probationary employee for prolonged unauthorized absence without leave, affirming that termination during probation is a simple discharge not requiring notice or hearing.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant probation period termination during probation unauthorized absence leave application

Abhishek Pahwa v. M/S EBACO INDIA PVT LTD & Anr

04 Sep 2015 · Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:7345

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to condone a one-day delay in filing the written statement and refused to strike off the defence, emphasizing the directory nature of procedural timelines and the ends of justice.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Section 151 CPC condonation of delay written statement

Soumitra Kumar Nahar v. Parul Nahar

04 Sep 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; P.S Teji · 2015:DHC:7346-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a child's welfare and expressed wishes override parental visitation rights under a consent order, granting visitation to the minor son but denying it to the daughter who refused to meet her father.

family appeal_allowed Significant visitation rights welfare of child consent order child's wishes

Seema Roy v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi)

04 Sep 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; P.S. Teji · 2015:DHC:7347-DB

The Delhi High Court highlighted systemic failures in rescuing and rehabilitating child labourers, directing urgent government action to ensure accountability and effective implementation of child protection laws.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Child Welfare Committee Juvenile Justice Act 2000 Child Labour Act 1986 Child rescue

Tarsem Singh v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

04 Sep 2015 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2015:DHC:7340

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for possession and transportation of heroin, holding that procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act were complied with and the prosecution proved the charge beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 50 NDPS secret information search and seizure

Suresh Kumar v. State and Anr

04 Sep 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:7334

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 506 IPC and 30 Arms Act at the initial investigation stage based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in appropriate cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences settlement agreement