Delhi High Court
36,380 judgments
Eureka Forbes Limited v. Nandan Sales and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Eureka Forbes against defendants for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off involving counterfeit water purifier products, decreeing the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants’ non-appearance.
Sombir v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition seeking mandamus for consideration of a representation already decided, granting liberty to file a proper petition challenging the decision.
Balwan Singh v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s representation against his transfer within four weeks, ensuring procedural fairness without immediate quashing of the transfer order.
M/S Nikon Finlease Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -04, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) for filing a revised income tax return to rectify a clerical error, holding that such errors not affecting income assessment warrant leniency.
Arun Navariya v. Sh. Naresh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of an application to dismiss an Election Petition, allowing the petitioner to argue all objections at trial while directing no adjournments for expeditious disposal.
Nutan Goyal & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings against petitioners under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the NI Act, holding that mere shareholding or directorship in a related company does not impose liability unless the person was in charge of and responsible for the company’s business at the time of the offence.
Anil Dutt Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a complaint against police officials for improper investigation due to absence of prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC, affirming the mandatory protection for public servants acting in official capacity.
Gurpal Kaur v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under Sections 498A and 417 IPC but declined to frame charges under Sections 406, 468, 471, and 420 IPC, emphasizing territorial jurisdiction and the necessity of entrustment for criminal breach of trust.
Dheeraj Arora v. Pariney Khanna
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging jurisdiction and maintainability of a domestic violence complaint, affirming that the court had territorial jurisdiction based on the aggrieved person's residence under Section 27 of the DV Act despite the exclusion of Jammu and Kashmir under Section 1(2).
Om Prakash Kaith Since Deceased Through LRS. and Anr. v. Chetan Handa & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the revision petition under Section 115 CPC as the impugned interlocutory order did not finally dispose of the suit and thus was not amenable to revision.
Garg Candle Works v. Commissioner, Delhi GST & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration is impermissible where the petitioner had already applied for cancellation, setting the effective cancellation date as the date of the show cause notice.
Shivank Udyog Ltd v. Surender Kaur
The High Court held that civil revision petitions against interlocutory orders of Commercial Courts are barred under Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and dismissed the petition accordingly.
CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. VISALAKSHI V & ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed the lender's petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to appoint a Receiver for repossession of hypothecated medical equipment upon borrower default, granting time to cure default and directing sale subject to arbitration.
Braham Prakash & Ors v. Daya Ram
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 115 CPC as withdrawn with liberty, directing expeditious trial and discouraging unnecessary adjournments in a long-pending civil suit.
Lalit Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the postponement of Shahdara Bar Association elections due to EVM unavailability, mandated candidate contributions for election expenses, and issued detailed directions to ensure free and fair elections.
St. Anthonys Boys Secondary School v. Director of Education and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that an aided minority school can fill teacher vacancies without prior approval from the Directorate of Education, setting aside a memorandum that unlawfully restrained recruitment.
Neeraj Gupta & Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that temporary tehbazari allotments can be vacated for public infrastructure projects without violating natural justice, directing petitioners to vacate kiosks and ordering consideration of alternative vending sites.
M/S KHANIJ IMPEX AND ANR v. M/S TRANSNATIONAL SHIPPING INDIA PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference under Article 227 in arbitral proceedings is limited to exceptional cases and dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to grant time for filing the Statement of Defence.
M/S MONTEL v. M/S THANDI RAM JAI NARAIN
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to grant the petitioner one opportunity to cross-examine a defense witness, imposing costs to prevent delay.
Kalpana v. Ashok Somani
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to frame an additional issue on property ownership in a recovery suit, dismissing the petition as infructuous after the suit’s disposal.