Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Deepak v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 323, 509, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement and withdrawal of proceedings by the complainant.
Jai Mahadev Auto Deals v. The State NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a Section 138 NI Act complaint for non-prosecution where the complainant was present and willing to proceed despite counsel’s absence due to technical issues, restoring the complaint for trial.
Arun Kumar Jindal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Anticipatory bail was denied to a senior railway engineer accused of large-scale bribery and conspiracy, as the court found overwhelming evidence and procedural compliance by the investigating agency.
Mohd Rashid Alis Shakir v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of robbery and attempt to murder after nearly seven years of custody, emphasizing the prolonged detention and advanced trial stage despite the gravity of offences.
Kapil Dev v. Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking investigation into alleged corrupt practices by the petitioner’s father-in-law, holding that matrimonial disputes and disputed factual allegations do not warrant writ jurisdiction absent statutory cause of action.
IMPRESARIO ENTERTAINMENT & HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. v. STAR HOSPITALITY
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to the plaintiff against the defendant for unauthorized use of the deceptively similar trademark 'SOCIAL AFFAIR', holding it to be trademark infringement and passing off.
The State (NCT of Delhi) v. Sanaul Khan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to unreliable and contradictory testimony of the prosecutrix.
SI Kiran Dayal v. Awadh Raj
The Delhi High Court condoned delay and granted leave to appeal against the acquittal in a POCSO sexual assault case, emphasizing the need for prima facie scrutiny at the leave stage without detailed reappraisal of evidence.
Vikram Singh v. FIITJEE Ltd and Anr
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the arbitration clause in the employment service rules to adjudicate the petitioner’s dues dispute, directing arbitration under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rahul Jain v. FIITJEE Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and does not extend to merits of the dispute.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sh Ravinder Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal and upheld compensation awarded to a workman injured in an employment-related accident despite absence of formal medical records, relying on admitted facts and credible testimony.
M/S D S GLOBAL PVT LTD v. M/S IND SYNERGY LTD
The Delhi High Court clarified that its earlier judgment set aside the impugned order issuing warrants of arrest, recalling those warrants and allowing the executing court to proceed further.
Hari Singh v. Suresh Pawar
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of repeated applications for cross-examination and additional evidence in Section 138 NI Act cases, emphasizing finality and prevention of abuse of process.
Bhana Ram Choudhary v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity opium case, holding that conscious possession and the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act apply, precluding bail.
Sh. Narender Kumar & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process under Section 528 BNSS.
Tejasswi Sharma and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and all criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage between the parties.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Satyanaryan
The Delhi High Court held that delay in filing the Detailed Accident Report caused by police authorities does not bar a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, and the Tribunal can condone such delay to ensure just compensation to the victim.
Narender Sonar Khane & Ors. v. Central Public Works Department
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an interim Labour Court order, holding that such interim orders under the Industrial Disputes Act are not maintainable before the High Court and must be challenged after the final award.
Tejinder Kaur & Anr. v. Chattar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to grant judgment on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that no clear admission was made and the defendant's plausible defense warranted a trial.
Seema Khattar v. Dinesh Kumar
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that the complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt and the presumption under Section 139 was not attracted.