Delhi High Court

98,981 judgments

Year:

Kashish Batra v. State

05 Apr 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:1166

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a child rape case, holding that supplementary charge-sheets do not extend default bail timelines and emphasizing the need for stern judicial approach in heinous offences against minors.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail Section 439 Cr.P.C. default bail Section 167 Cr.P.C.

Saroj Bhola & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

05 Apr 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:1168
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the discharge order in a dowry death case, directing further investigation due to defective probe and applying the presumption under Section 113B Indian Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 306 IPC Section 113B Indian Evidence Act

Britannia Industries Ltd v. ITC Ltd & Ors.

05 Apr 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:1160
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' biscuit packaging is not deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark packaging and dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction applications for trademark infringement and passing off.

intellectual_property petition_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off deceptive similarity Trade Marks Act 1999

Nag Constructors Private Limited v. Official Liquidator

05 Apr 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:1187

The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's petition for dissolution of Nag Constructors Private Limited after confirming compliance with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate petition_allowed members voluntary liquidation Companies Act 1956 Section 497(6) Official Liquidator

Rajender Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Apr 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:1181-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of promotion due to lack of prescribed qualifications, affirming that relaxation of recruitment rules is discretionary and ad-hoc promotions do not confer enforceable rights.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant promotion prescribed qualifications relaxation of rules ad-hoc promotion

M/S Omaxe New Chandigarh Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Apr 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:1178-DB

The Delhi High Court held that mandatory pre-show cause notice consultation under the 2017 Master Circular requires a two-way deliberative process and cannot be satisfied by voluntary statements before investigative officers, directing respondents to conduct such consultation before proceeding.

administrative other Significant pre-show cause notice consultation Finance Act, 1994 Central Board of Excise & Customs 2017 Master Circular

Back Office IT Solutions Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Apr 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:1186-DB

The Delhi High Court held that failure to conduct mandatory pre-show cause notice consultation under the 2015 instruction and 2017 Master Circular renders the show cause notice invalid unless it relates to preventive or offence-related action.

tax appeal_allowed Significant pre-show cause notice consultation service tax preventive action Finance Act, 1994

Shashi v. State NCT of Delhi

05 Apr 2021 · Siddharth Mridul; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2021:DHC:1174-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of an adult woman who voluntarily married and chose to reside with her husband, affirming her constitutional right to personal liberty.

constitutional petition_dismissed habeas corpus adult woman right to marry illegal detention

Preeti Jain v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

05 Apr 2021 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2021:DHC:1164

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder conspiracy case, holding that strong prima facie evidence and serious allegations outweigh humanitarian grounds for bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail conspiracy to murder Section 302 IPC electronic evidence

Caltex Oil India Private Limited v. Official Liquidator

05 Apr 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:1185

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to dissolve Caltex Oil India Private Limited under Section 509(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 after confirming compliance with winding up procedures and absence of liabilities.

corporate petition_allowed voluntary winding up company dissolution Companies Act 1956 Section 509(6)

Jaiveer Singh v. Sunita Chaudhary

05 Apr 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:1162

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order directing the husband to pay Rs. 17,000 monthly maintenance to his wife under Section 125 CrPC, holding that the wife was unable to maintain herself and the husband had sufficient means.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance Section 125 CrPC wife's inability to maintain revisional jurisdiction

Innovision Limited v. Nayati Healthcare Research Pvt Ltd

05 Apr 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:1173

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve payment disputes between Innovision Limited and Nayati Healthcare Research Pvt Ltd as per their arbitration agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 12(2) appointment of arbitrator

Carmate India Private Limited v. Official Liquidator

05 Apr 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:1188

The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator’s petition to dissolve Carmate India Private Limited after completion of creditors voluntary liquidation and compliance with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate petition_allowed Companies Act 1956 Section 509(6) creditors voluntary liquidation Official Liquidator

Naharpur Yuva Shakti RWA v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Mar 2021 · D. N. Patel; Jasmeet Singh · 2021:DHC:1154-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against vacating the stay on DDA's auction of residential plots, emphasizing delay, adequate provision of parks, and public interest in development.

property appeal_dismissed auction proceedings Delhi Development Authority stay order residential plots

Synfonia Tradelinks Pvt Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-22(4)

26 Mar 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:1142-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act due to non-application of mind and invalid sanction, emphasizing the necessity of cogent reasons and independent satisfaction for reopening assessments.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Section 151

GE Capital Mauritius Overseas Investments v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

26 Mar 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2021:DHC:1145-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a Section 241A order withholding income tax refund during ongoing scrutiny assessment, limiting writ court interference to procedural aspects without adjudicating tax liability.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 241A Income Tax Act withholding refund scrutiny assessment Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement

Sunil Kumar Nagpal v. Central Bank of India & Ors.

26 Mar 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:1146
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a bank officer for serious misconduct while quashing findings on certain charges due to procedural infirmity in the disciplinary authority's disagreement note.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings bank employee misconduct principles of natural justice disagreement note

Pawan Gaur v. State (NCT of Delhi)

26 Mar 2021 · Subramonium Prasad · 2021:DHC:1144

The Delhi High Court held that FIRs for rape under Section 376 IPC cannot be quashed on the basis of compromise between parties, emphasizing the serious societal nature of such offences.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 376 IPC rape

Chander Kanta & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

26 Mar 2021 · Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:1138

The High Court set aside the Trial Court's order returning the plaint for non-compliance with mandatory notice under Section 80 CPC, holding that urgent relief claims require opportunity to show cause before returning the plaint.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 80 CPC Notice to Government Urgent relief Return of plaint

Arun Kumar Parihar v. State (Govt NCTD)

26 Mar 2021 · Anu Malhotra · 2021:DHC:1137

The Delhi High Court quashed non-bailable warrants and process under Section 82 CrPC against the petitioner, holding that such coercive measures require judicial discretion and cannot be issued merely to aid police investigation when the accused is not absconding.

criminal petition_allowed Significant non-bailable warrant Section 82 CrPC Section 73 CrPC proclaimed offender