Delhi High Court
36,560 judgments
Mayank & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under the BNS, 2023 based on a genuine compromise between parties, applying the principles from Gian Singh v. State of Punjab.
Sarthak Jain & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Kuldeep Mourya and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing that continuing criminal proceedings would be futile and against public interest.
Saurav Beverages Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed ex-parte due to defective notice via portal, remanding for fresh adjudication with proper hearing, while leaving validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court ruling.
Toshniwal Electricals Pvt Ltd v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic GST assessment order for lack of proper hearing and consideration, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court review.
Mahavir Ispat Udyog v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking GST demand order for lack of personal hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Indus Environmental Services Pvt Ltd v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court set aside ex parte GST demand order for lack of natural justice and remanded for fresh adjudication, leaving validity of impugned notifications to Supreme Court.
Garg Agency v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order and granted the petitioner another opportunity to be heard, while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Aradhna Bags v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of effective notice and hearing, while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A of the GST Act open pending Supreme Court decision.
R K Plastic v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication order and remanded for fresh hearing after petitioner failed to avail opportunity, while leaving validity of impugned notifications to Supreme Court.
Saad Minhaj v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/AVATO
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic GST adjudication order for violating natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of impugned GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Luxmi Jewellers v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic GST adjudication order, allowing the petitioner to file a fresh reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Monika Narang v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal against a GST demand order despite pending challenges to the notification's validity before the Supreme Court, refraining from interfering under writ jurisdiction.
Sanjay Narang v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of proper notice and hearing, directing fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the underlying GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Monika Narang v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications to the Supreme Court.
Sumit Enterprises v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 63 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order for denial of personal hearing due to inadequate notice on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications to be decided by the Supreme Court.
Korea Marine Transport Co Ltd v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato, Ward 204 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to denial of effective notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
A S International v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 61
Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order for lack of personal hearing and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of related GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Sumit Enterprises v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 63
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Jai Industries v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an order passed without considering the petitioner’s reply and directed fresh adjudication with a personal hearing, while leaving the validity of GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.