Delhi High Court

36,560 judgments

Year:

Rajeev Aggarwal v. Neetu Birla

08 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3479

The High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of pending applications in a recovery suit, emphasizing avoidance of undue delay and cooperation of parties.

civil other Order VII Rule 11 CPC expeditious disposal pending applications trial court directions

MS PRIME GOLD SAIL JVC LIMITED v. SHUBHAM STEEL INDUSTRIES

08 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3478

The High Court allowed the petitioner to examine a delayed witness in a commercial suit subject to conditions, emphasizing timely steps and fairness in trial proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed examination of witnesses late stage trial commercial suit trial court discretion

Najrul@Kuti v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

08 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3465

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in an NDPS case involving intermediate quantity heroin recovery, holding that completed investigation and absence of other cases justify bail despite pending CDR evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed NDPS Act bail intermediate quantity heroin

Dharmender Kumar Tandon v. State of NCT of Delhi

08 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3440

The Delhi High Court allowed parole to the petitioner, emphasizing the rehabilitative purpose of parole and balancing it against public peace by imposing conditions despite adverse police reports.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant parole rehabilitation law and order habitual offender

Yogesh Bansal @ Kake v. State (NCT of Delhi)

08 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3443

The Delhi High Court dismissed a parole petition due to non-disclosure of a pending furlough petition and directed the Competent Authority to decide the parole application in accordance with law.

criminal petition_dismissed parole furlough non-disclosure concealment of facts

Gurmeet Singh Sachdeva v. Skyways Air Services Pvt. Ltd

08 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:3427

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to reject the plaint for non-disclosure of cause of action, holding that documents filed with the plaint must be considered under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order 7 Rule 11 CPC cause of action rejection of plaint documents filed with plaint

Rajni Verma v. Pushpa Sonkar

08 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3469

The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with the Executing Court's pending order on attachment of a pension account, directing expeditious disposal considering the petitioner's medical condition.

civil petition_dismissed pension account attachment Section 60 CPC execution proceedings

Sunil v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

07 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:3431

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of attempted murder, considering his custody period, conduct, and bail granted to co-accused, subject to stringent conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 307 IPC grievous injury knife weapon

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INS CO LTD v. ROSHAN LAL & ORS

07 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4770
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a driving license for light motor vehicles authorizes driving a three-wheeler, dismissing the insurer’s appeal and affirming liability to indemnify under the Motor Vehicles Act.

motor_vehicle_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 light motor vehicle three-wheeler driving license

Mr. Priamvada; Mr. Ankit Sethi; Mr. Ritish Chauhan v. CS Ajay Antarkar and Anr

07 May 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:4025
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by a non-member challenging the ICSI Disciplinary Committee's exoneration of a member, holding that judicial review is limited to procedural fairness and no appeal lies to non-members under the Company Secretaries Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant professional misconduct disciplinary proceedings Institute of Company Secretaries of India natural justice

Cadence Design Systems - India - Pvt. Ltd. v. National Faceless Assessment Centre

07 May 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3848-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a penalty under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act imposed on deleted additions, holding that penalty cannot survive once the additions are quashed by the ITAT and accepted by the Revenue.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 270A penalty Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance penalty proceedings

Sandeep Jain v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 82 & Ors.

07 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3968-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand and rectification orders passed without personal hearing due to inadequate notice, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Show Cause Notice Principles of Natural Justice Limitation Period

Raghuvir Prasad Jain Proprietor Raghuvir Prasad Jain and Sons v. Commissioner of DGST

07 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3890-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST demand orders based on disputed notifications, directing adjudication of the statutory appeal and leaving the validity of the notifications to the Supreme Court's decision.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Section 168A Central GST Act Validity of GST notifications Show Cause Notice Demand order

Saurav Beverages Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

07 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3891-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Section 168A GST Act Natural Justice Personal Hearing

Saurav Beverages Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

07 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3888-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice and hearing due to defective service via the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab Section 168A CGST Act

M/S CHANDGI RAM AND SONS v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

07 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3889-DB

Delhi High Court set aside appellate order rejecting GST appeal for delay and restored it for merits hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A GST Act Validity of GST notifications Extension of time limit for adjudication Show Cause Notice

Kolbros v. Union of India & Ors.

07 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3887-DB

The Delhi High Court restored the petitioner’s appeal against a GST demand order and allowed adjudication on merits without limitation bar, pending the Supreme Court’s decision on the validity of the impugned notification extending limitation periods under Section 168A of the GST Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A Central GST Act Notification 56/2023-Central Tax extension of limitation GST Council recommendation

M/S. BALAJI ENGINEERING WORKS v. UNION OF INDIA

07 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3885-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper notice via the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of time-extension notifications pending Supreme Court review.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab Section 168A GST Act

Monu & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

07 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:3416

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 324 IPC

Dinesh Dalal & Anr. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

07 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:3415

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine settlement between estranged spouses, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes upon amicable compromise.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS matrimonial dispute settlement and compromise