Delhi High Court

69,037 judgments

Year:

ICICI BANK LTD v. JITENDRA SHARMA & ORS.

15 Sep 2016 · JAYANT NATH · 2016:DHC:6520

The High Court set aside the trial court's procedural order and directed it to issue summons and proceed with the suit as per the Civil Procedure Code.

civil appeal_allowed Civil Procedure Code trial court order summons procedure

Malhotra Book Depot & Ors v. MBD Electronics Pvt Ltd

14 Sep 2016 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:9353

Permanent injunction granted restraining defendant from using the trademark "MBD" based on plaintiffs' registered trademark and uncontested ex parte evidence.

civil appeal_allowed trademark infringement permanent injunction registered trademark ex parte evidence

Om Prakash Sharma v. Dr Ashwani Kumar Seth

14 Sep 2016 · JAYANT NATH · 2010 (2) SCC 15

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition, holding that delay in filing leave to defend under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act cannot be condoned merely on grounds of family emergency.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act Section 25-B eviction petition leave to defend

Chunni Lal & Ors v. Mukesh Kumar & Anr

14 Sep 2016 · Jayant Nath · 2016:DHC:9341

The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in an eviction petition allowing the tenants extended possession on payment of damages, with the landlord agreeing to withhold eviction execution subject to compliance.

property settled eviction tenancy settlement undertaking

Shashl Shekhar@Neeraj v. State of Not of Delhi

14 Sep 2016 · Vipin Sanghi · 2016:DHC:9133

The Delhi High Court granted a four-week extension of parole to the petitioner on the ground of his daughter's fixed marriage, directing release on the same terms as the original parole.

criminal petition_allowed parole extension writ petition family marriage interim order

Suresh v. State

14 Sep 2016 · A. K. Pathak · 2016:DHC:9131

The Delhi High Court granted one month parole to the petitioner for house reconstruction and maintaining family ties, subject to furnishing bond and surety.

criminal petition_allowed parole furlough prisoner rights personal bond

Deepak v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

14 Sep 2016 · A.K. Pathak · 2016:DHC:9130

The petitioner withdrew the criminal writ petition before the Delhi High Court, leading to its disposal as withdrawn and the connected miscellaneous application as infructuous.

criminal other Procedural withdrawal of petition writ petition disposal as withdrawn miscellaneous application

Bhoop Singh @ Pappu v. State

14 Sep 2016 · P.S. Singh; A.K. Pathak · 2016:DHC:9129

The Delhi High Court granted parole for one month to a long-term convict who had previously availed parole without misuse, emphasizing parole’s rehabilitative benefits.

criminal petition_allowed parole long incarceration personal bond surety

Birju Chihietri v. State

14 Sep 2016 · A. K. Pathak · 2016:DHC:9128

The Delhi High Court granted parole for one month to a prisoner to assist his chronically ill wife, emphasizing humanitarian grounds and prior good conduct during parole.

criminal petition_allowed parole humanitarian grounds chronic rheumatoid arthritis personal bond

Geeta Bhateja v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

14 Sep 2016 · A. K. Pathak · 2016:DHC:9127

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC based on a bona fide compromise between the parties and the complainant's no objection to the quashing.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR compromise in criminal case Section 420 IPC Section 468 IPC

Jai Ram v. Respondent

14 Sep 2016 · A.K. Pathak · 2016:DHC:9126

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of parole due to the petitioner's unsatisfactory jail conduct involving punishments, upholding the administrative decision under the Parole/Furlough Guidelines, 2010.

criminal petition_dismissed parole jail conduct punishment in prison Parole/Furlough Guidelines 2010

AMANPUNIA v. STATE OF NOT OF DELHI & ANR

14 Sep 2016 · MUKTA GUPTA · 2016:DHC:9084

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to repeated non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel, despite information about the petitioner's death.

other petition_dismissed non-prosecution dismissal of petition non-appearance verification of death

Smt Jasleen Kaur v. State

14 Sep 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:9083

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's repeated adjournment requests and lack of interest in pursuing the matter.

criminal petition_dismissed non-prosecution adjournment writ petition dismissal

Seema Goyal v. State & Anr.

14 Sep 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:9062

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of bail challenge petitions with liberty to file cancellation petitions if bail conditions are breached, and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail cancellation of bail withdrawal of petition liberty to file

Mehfooz Alam @ Junaid Khan @ Model v. State of Delhi & Ors

14 Sep 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:9036

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 307/34 IPC and Arms Act, holding that compromise is not a ground to quash serious offence FIRs.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 307 IPC Arms Act offences compromise

Harsharan Singh v. State (Govt of Delhi)

14 Sep 2016 · Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:9035

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition as abated upon the death of the petitioner during the pendency of the case.

criminal other abatement death of petitioner criminal miscellaneous case disposal of petition

B. N. Singh v. The Registrar, Co-op. Group Housing Society & Ors.

14 Sep 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sunita Gupta · 2016:DHC:8786-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the exclusion of charge-sheeted cooperative society members from regularisation of illegal self-draws for flat allotment under a 2011 notification, dismissing their writ petitions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 Section 77 self-draw of lots regularisation

Rattan Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr

14 Sep 2016 · Indermeet Kaur · 2016:DHC:8784

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition holding that a person whose entire land is not acquired is not entitled to an alternate plot under the government scheme, affirming the Supreme Court's ruling in Delhi Administration v. Jai Singh Kanwar.

property petition_dismissed Significant alternate plot allotment land acquisition partial acquisition Delhi Administration v. Jai Singh Kanwar

SUNIL KUMAR v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

14 Sep 2016 · Indermeet Kaur · 2016:DHC:8783 N

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an alternate plot allotment application, holding that entitlement arises only when the entire landholding is acquired, following the Supreme Court precedent in Jai Singh Kanwar.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition alternate plot allotment entitlement partial acquisition

Petitioner v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

14 Sep 2016 · Indermeet Kaur · 2016:DHC:8781

The Delhi High Court upheld the principle that entitlement to an alternate plot arises only when the entire land is acquired, dismissing the petitioner's claim based on partial acquisition.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition alternate plot allotment entitlement partial acquisition