Full Text
Translation output
\ v' $^8 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)1302/2016
GEETA BHATEJA Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rakesh Walia,Adv.
W.P.(CRL)1302/2016
GEETA BHATEJA Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rakesh Walia,Adv.
VERSUS
STATE GOVT OF NCT OFDELHI& ANR Respondents
Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC with Ms. Mallika Parmar,Adv.
Mr. Vikas Bhaduria, Adv. for R-2 along with Ms. Vandna Mishra, Managing Trustee ofR-2in person.
Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC with Ms. Mallika Parmar,Adv.
Mr. Vikas Bhaduria, Adv. for R-2 along with Ms. Vandna Mishra, Managing Trustee ofR-2in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.PATHAK
ORDER o/o 14.09.2016 File is taken up today as 13^^ September,2016 was declared holiday on account ofIduT Zuha.
Petitioner has prayed for quashing of FIR No. 193/2009 under
Sections 420/468/471/120-B IPG registered at police station Uttam Nagar, on the complaint ofrespondent no.2 in view ofthe compromise arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.2. In nutshell, complainant has alleged that petitioner was working with respondent no.2 as an accountant.
Petitioner misappropriated ^16 lacs by making interpolation in the cheques and also by manipulating the account books. It is submitted that misappropriation was discovered by the new accountant engaged by the
2016:DHC:9127 respondentno.2,after petitioner leftthejob.
Ms. Vandna Mishra,Managing Trustee ofrespondent no.2 is present in Court and admits that compromise has been arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.2 vide Memorandum of Understanding dated
12* April,2016. She submits that petitioner has already paid ?6.25 lacs to respondent no.2 out of the total settled amount, that is, ?12.50 lacs.
Remaining settled amount,that is,^6.25 lacs has been handed over to the respondent no.2 today in Court by way oftwo demand drafts, photocopies whereof have been placed on record. Ms. Vandna Mishra, Managing
Trustee ofrespondent no.2submits that respondent no.2 has no objection in case the FIR is quashed in view ofthe settlement.
Keeping in mind that parties have settled their disputes amicably,in the interest ofjustice,FIR No.193/2009 under Sections 420/468/471/120-B
IPC registered at police station Uttam Nagar and the consequentproceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Writ petition is disposed ofin the above terms.
Dasti. ^ A.KhTATHAK,J.
SEPTEMBER 14,2016 ga 2016:DHC:9127
ORDER o/o 14.09.2016 File is taken up today as 13^^ September,2016 was declared holiday on account ofIduT Zuha.
Petitioner has prayed for quashing of FIR No. 193/2009 under
Sections 420/468/471/120-B IPG registered at police station Uttam Nagar, on the complaint ofrespondent no.2 in view ofthe compromise arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.2. In nutshell, complainant has alleged that petitioner was working with respondent no.2 as an accountant.
Petitioner misappropriated ^16 lacs by making interpolation in the cheques and also by manipulating the account books. It is submitted that misappropriation was discovered by the new accountant engaged by the
2016:DHC:9127 respondentno.2,after petitioner leftthejob.
Ms. Vandna Mishra,Managing Trustee ofrespondent no.2 is present in Court and admits that compromise has been arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.2 vide Memorandum of Understanding dated
12* April,2016. She submits that petitioner has already paid ?6.25 lacs to respondent no.2 out of the total settled amount, that is, ?12.50 lacs.
Remaining settled amount,that is,^6.25 lacs has been handed over to the respondent no.2 today in Court by way oftwo demand drafts, photocopies whereof have been placed on record. Ms. Vandna Mishra, Managing
Trustee ofrespondent no.2submits that respondent no.2 has no objection in case the FIR is quashed in view ofthe settlement.
Keeping in mind that parties have settled their disputes amicably,in the interest ofjustice,FIR No.193/2009 under Sections 420/468/471/120-B
IPC registered at police station Uttam Nagar and the consequentproceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Writ petition is disposed ofin the above terms.
Dasti. ^ A.KhTATHAK,J.
SEPTEMBER 14,2016 ga 2016:DHC:9127
JUDGMENT