Delhi High Court
69,037 judgments
Surajbhan v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire land has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, dismissing the petition challenging the rejection of such allotment.
Rajpal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire landholding is not acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the relevant policy and Supreme Court precedent.
Kishan Chand (Deceased) Through LRS v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an alternate plot allotment application, holding that entitlement arises only when the entire land is acquired, applying the Supreme Court precedent in Jai Singh Kanwar.
Mahender Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of alternate plot allotment, holding that only persons whose entire land is acquired are entitled to alternate plots under the acquisition scheme, as per Supreme Court precedent.
Sukhvir Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a person is entitled to an alternate plot allotment only if his entire land is acquired, dismissing the petition of a landowner whose land was partially acquired.
Jai Pal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire land is not acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, dismissing the petitioner’s claim accordingly.
Mahender Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire land has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the relevant land acquisition policy, dismissing the petitioner’s claim.
Rajbir v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a person is entitled to an alternate plot only if his entire land is acquired, dismissing the petitioner's claim where part of the land remained unacquired.
Khajan Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a person is entitled to an alternate plot only if their entire landholding is acquired, dismissing the petitioner's claim based on partial acquisition and government policy.
SURAJBHAN v. GOVT NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking allotment of an alternate plot, holding that entitlement arises only when the entire land is acquired, applying the Supreme Court precedent in Jai Singh Kanwar.
Azad Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire landholding has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, affirming the Supreme Court precedent.
Rajinder Parsad v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking allotment of an alternate plot on the ground that the petitioner's entire land was not acquired, reaffirming the Supreme Court's ruling that only owners whose entire land is acquired and who are left without shelter are eligible for alternate plots.
Rajinder Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an alternate plot allotment application, holding that entitlement arises only when the entire land is acquired, per Supreme Court precedent.
Anita v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire land has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, dismissing the petitioner’s claim.
Kajeshdevi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose land is only partially acquired and who is not left completely landless is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 Policy, dismissing the petition challenging rejection of such allotment.
Rajbelsingh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire landholding has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, dismissing the petitioner’s claim.
Vijay Pal Godara v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a person is entitled to an alternate plot only if their entire land is acquired, dismissing the petition of a partial landowner seeking such allotment.
Raj Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire landholding has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, dismissing the petitioner’s claim.
Pyare Lal (Deceased) Through LRS v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that under the relevant land acquisition scheme and Supreme Court precedent, a person whose entire land is not acquired is not entitled to an alternate plot, dismissing the petitioner’s claim.
Hari Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a person is entitled to an alternate plot only if his entire land is acquired, and partial acquisition does not confer such entitlement under the 1986 policy.