Full Text
Translation output
$-11 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 2278/2016
JAI RAM @VICKY Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dinesh Malik, Adv.
W.P.(CRL) 2278/2016
JAI RAM @VICKY Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dinesh Malik, Adv.
VERSUS
Respondent
Through: Mr. R.S. Kundu, Sr. Adv. with Insp.
Dinesh Kumar, P.S. Kanjhawla.
Through: Mr. R.S. Kundu, Sr. Adv. with Insp.
Dinesh Kumar, P.S. Kanjhawla.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
ORDER o/o 14.09.2016 File is taken up today as 13''^ September, 2016 was declared holiday on account ofIduT Zuha.
Petitioner has challenged the order dated U' August, 2016 passed by the Govt. ofNOT ofDelhi whereby his request for grant ofparole has been rejected, inter alia, on the ground that jail conduct of the petitioner was unsatisfactory as he was awarded punishment on 3'"'^ March, 2016. Aperusal of nominal roll shows that petitioner has been awarded punishment twice.
First punishment was given to him on 3'^^ March, 2016; whereas second punishment was given on 29^^ March, 2016. Para 11.2 of the
Parole/Furlough Guidelines, 2010 envisages that the conduct in prison must
2016:DHC:9126 have been uniformly good. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 ga A.K 2016:DHC:9126
ORDER o/o 14.09.2016 File is taken up today as 13''^ September, 2016 was declared holiday on account ofIduT Zuha.
Petitioner has challenged the order dated U' August, 2016 passed by the Govt. ofNOT ofDelhi whereby his request for grant ofparole has been rejected, inter alia, on the ground that jail conduct of the petitioner was unsatisfactory as he was awarded punishment on 3'"'^ March, 2016. Aperusal of nominal roll shows that petitioner has been awarded punishment twice.
First punishment was given to him on 3'^^ March, 2016; whereas second punishment was given on 29^^ March, 2016. Para 11.2 of the
Parole/Furlough Guidelines, 2010 envisages that the conduct in prison must
2016:DHC:9126 have been uniformly good. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 ga A.K 2016:DHC:9126
JUDGMENT