Delhi High Court
101,979 judgments
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED v. M/S MANJU TRADERS & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that pendency of a Section 8 application does not bar appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 and appointed the arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement despite parallel civil proceedings.
Sanjay Kumar Sain v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that judicial scrutiny of lower court orders does not impugn judicial officers' integrity absent specific adverse findings and dismissed the recall application seeking expunging of remarks against a judicial officer.
Minor Child K & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside bailable warrants against a minor victim and directed strict adherence to POCSO Act safeguards and judicial guidelines to protect child victims during trial, endorsing video-conferencing and limiting victim presence during bail hearings to prevent re-traumatization.
Jaswant Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of criminal intimidation under Section 506 IPC due to lack of credible evidence and failure to prove essential ingredients of the offence.
Major Kanika Sharma Army v. DSC NK Raj Narain Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of disability pension under the Entitlement Rules, 2008, holding that the burden to disprove attributability lies on the military establishment and that mere onset of disease at a peace station is insufficient to deny pension.
M/S. SHREE BALAJI CABLE INDUSTRIES v. SH. PRAMOD GUPTA
The Delhi High Court set aside a trial court's ex-parte order under Order IX Rule 7 CPC, subject to costs, allowing the petitioner to file a written statement within two weeks.
Neena Kapoor v. Ms. Anita Rani Mehra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that disputed factual issues including adoption and limitation require evidence and cannot be decided summarily at the threshold.
Murari Kumar Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a BSF constable due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards in recording his plea of guilty under Rule 142(2) of the BSF Rules, ordering reinstatement with back wages.
Ankur Garg v. Delhi Technological University
The Delhi High Court held that a contractual employee engaged without a public recruitment process cannot claim regularisation, and upheld the University's right to conduct open recruitment in compliance with constitutional mandates.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Rajesh Jain & Ors
The Delhi High Court revised the compensation in a motor accident claim by reducing future prospects to 40%, subsuming loss of love and affection under loss of consortium, and upheld the insurer's right of recovery against the unlicensed driver.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Shakil Ahmed & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that insurance coverage commences from the date and time the premium is paid and accepted, dismissing the insurer's appeal and upholding compensation for a motor accident occurring before the policy's stated start date.
Deepak Kumar v. Shopal Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a permanently disabled motor accident victim by increasing attendant charges, awarding future medical expenses, and augmenting non-pecuniary damages, emphasizing just compensation that restores dignity.
Commissioner of Police and Ors v. Anil Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside disciplinary penalty imposed on a police constable due to unreliable and unauthenticated digital evidence forming the basis of corruption allegations.
Shri Krishan Gopal through Mrs. Manju Devi and Anr. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed unaided private minority schools to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions and release arrears and terminal benefits with interest, affirming employees' statutory entitlement under the Delhi School Education Act.
APEX BUILDSYS LTD v. NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE TESTING AND R AND D INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
The Delhi High Court condoned a 22-day delay and extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by nine months under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
Master Kavish v. Modern Public School & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the DoE to clearly indicate the maximum class offered by schools in the EWS admission list to ensure informed parental choice and uphold the rights of economically weaker students.