Delhi High Court

28,224 judgments

Year:

Harjit Singh v. Sardar Rawel Singh Dead Thr Lrs & Ors

23 Dec 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a partition suit for concealment and violation of undertaking, holding that such serious allegations do not justify summary dismissal without trial on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant dismissal of suit concealment of material facts undertaking violation Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC

Priyanka Chowdhary v. Hari Ram @ Hari Prakash

23 Dec 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:11798
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that in eviction proceedings under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act, the landlady need only prove a better title than the tenant and bona fide requirement, setting aside the Rent Controller's dismissal and ordering eviction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Eviction petition Bona fide requirement

Atma Ram Builders Pvt Ltd v. Embassy Restaurant & Anr

23 Dec 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:11746-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that after striking down key provisions of the Delhi Rent Control Act, civil courts have jurisdiction to entertain suits for recovery of reasonable or market rent, and a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC on the ground of statutory bar.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Order VII Rule 11 CPC standard rent market rent

Rajesh Gupta & Ors. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 31 Delhi & Ors.

23 Dec 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:11753-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retention of seized jewellery beyond 120 days without a reasoned order is illegal if the nature and source of acquisition are satisfactorily explained, directing immediate release of assets under Section 132B of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 132B Income Tax Act seizure and release of assets wealth tax returns valuation of jewellery

Shahid Yousuf v. National Investigation Agency

23 Dec 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain

The Delhi High Court held that an order framing charge under the NIA Act is an interlocutory order and not appealable under Section 21, dismissing appeals challenging such orders on maintainability grounds.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 Section 21 NIA Act Order framing charge Interlocutory order

Umesh Kumar v. State (GNCT) of Delhi

23 Dec 2025 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:11787

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for kidnapping and wrongful confinement but modified the sentence to the period already served, emphasizing rehabilitation and mitigating factors in sentencing.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant kidnapping wrongful confinement rape sentence modification

Ravi v. The State of NCT of Delhi

23 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:11832
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery with a weapon but modified the sentence to release him on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, recognizing the applicability of probation despite mandatory minimum sentencing under Section 397 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery Section 397 IPC Probation of Offenders Act mandatory minimum sentence

Council of Institute of Chartered Accountants v. Shri Kishan Gupta and Anr.

23 Dec 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:11755-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary findings against a Chartered Accountant for facilitating irregular share allotments via ante-dated stock-invests, suspending him from ICAI membership for one year to uphold professional integrity.

professional_regulatory appeal_allowed Significant Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 professional misconduct ante-dated stock-invests irregular allotment

ZSCALER INC v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), NEW DELHI

23 Dec 2025 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; VINOD KUMAR · 2025:DHC:11752-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the Section 197 certificate rejecting Nil Withholding Certificate for AY 2025-26, directing fresh consideration in light of ITAT’s setting aside of prior assessment orders establishing no Permanent Establishment in India.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 Income Tax Act Nil Withholding Certificate Dependent Agent Permanent Establishment Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – 1 v. M/S AGROHA FINCAP LTD.

23 Dec 2025 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; VINOD KUMAR · 2025:DHC:11754-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that the Revenue's appeal is maintainable under the exception for organised tax evasion in the latest CBDT Circular, which applies retrospectively, and refused remand on unpressed grounds.

tax petition_dismissed Significant CBDT Circular tax effect maintainability of appeal accommodation entry

Laxmi Electric Company v. Mahesh Vaidya

23 Dec 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:11796

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on landlord's bona fide requirement under the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting tenant's claim of occupying a different shop and emphasizing estoppel by prior admissions.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 shop number dispute

Parshottam Lal v. New Light Trading Company & Ors.

23 Dec 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:11797

The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition setting aside the dismissal of eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that better title and bona fide requirement were established and the revision petition was maintainable under Section 25B(8).

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Section 25B summary procedure bona fide requirement

Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Ct Anuj Kumar

23 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:11776-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquittal in a criminal case does not invalidate departmental punishment for failure to inform the department, setting aside the Tribunal's order that had quashed the disciplinary action.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry failure to inform department acquittal Rule 12 Delhi Police Rules

Pramod Kumar Rawat v. Union of India

23 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:11777-DB

The Delhi High Court held that imposing separate departmental and pension penalties based on distinct charges and criminal conviction does not violate double jeopardy and upheld permanent withholding of pension and gratuity following conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant double jeopardy Article 20(2) Constitution of India Article 311(2) Constitution of India Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

M/S BANWARI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST v. ATUL JAIN

23 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:11836

The High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge to the execution court's refusal to appoint a Local Commissioner for property demarcation, upholding the binding nature of the settlement and the clarity of the site plan.

civil petition_dismissed compromise decree execution proceedings demarcation Local Commissioner

Kuldeep Singh Sengar v. Central Bureau of Investigation

23 Dec 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan · 2025:DHC:11860-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that an MLA is not a 'public servant' under IPC and dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence during appeal in a POCSO Act rape conviction involving a minor victim.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant public servant definition POCSO Act minority determination school admission register

MKU Limited v. Union of India

23 Dec 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela

The Delhi High Court upheld the disqualification of EOUs holding Industrial Licenses issued by the Department of Commerce from defence tenders requiring DPIIT-issued licenses, affirming the distinct legal status of such licenses under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial License Export Oriented Unit Department of Commerce Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade

Bijay Kumar Dubey v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2024 SCC OnLine P&H 2317

The Delhi High Court held that a BSF constable retired due to disability is entitled to invalid pension despite less than ten years of service, following clarifications in CCS Pension Rules and Supreme Court precedent.

administrative petition_allowed Significant invalid pension CCS Pension Rules 1972 qualifying service bodily infirmity

Sanjeev Maggu v. Additional Commissioner of Customs

23 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:11976-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the right to cross-examination in Customs Show Cause Notice proceedings is not absolute and permitted limited cross-examination of independent witnesses while denying it for Customs officials acting in official capacity.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant cross-examination Show Cause Notice Customs Duty evasion Customs Act, 1962

Ajay Chauhan v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 96 Zone 9 & Ors.

23 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:11967-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST demand order due to non-visibility of the show cause notice on the GST portal, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair opportunity to be heard, while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act show cause notice opportunity to be heard