Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Astral Ltd v. M/s. Ajay Enterprises
The Delhi High Court has territorial jurisdiction to try a trademark infringement suit where the plaintiff has a subordinate office and part of the cause of action arises in Delhi, notwithstanding the principal office being elsewhere.
Colgate Palmolive Company & Anr. v. NIXI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that domain name registrars must verify registrant details and comply with court orders to block infringing domain names, directing coordinated systemic measures involving banks and law enforcement to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud.
A.O. Smith Corporation and Anr. v. Star Smith Export Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from using a trade name and domain name deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademarks, holding such use infringes Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and constitutes passing off.
Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Domain Name Registrars must disclose registrant details and block infringing domain names to protect trademark rights and prevent cyber fraud, directing coordinated systemic reforms involving banks, law enforcement, and government agencies.
Bhupinder Mehta v. Pradeep Bareja
The Delhi High Court allowed a rectification petition cancelling a trademark registered in bad faith, holding that prior user rights and deceptive similarity principles mandate removal of the impugned mark under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
ARCHIDPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. ARCHIT NUWOOD INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the Plaintiff's application to amend the plaint by substituting an erroneously signed affidavit with the correct one, emphasizing that procedural errors can be rectified to serve the ends of justice without affecting substantive rights.
South Municipal Corporation v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court held that a criminal trial court cannot issue administrative directions for departmental proceedings beyond its criminal adjudicatory jurisdiction, expunged unwarranted observations, and dismissed petitions challenging such directions after compliance.
Mr. Manish Kumar Singh and Mr. Mritunjay v. Ex MWO Umesh Chandra Mishra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition upholding the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension found to be service-connected despite RMB's contrary finding.
Ms. Himanshi Singh; Ms. Monalisha Pradhan; Ms. Priya Khurana v. Capt. Bhartender Singh Kanwar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal order granting disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming established precedents on service connection despite late onset.
Union of India & Ors. v. A Ex JWO Ramesh Kumar Retd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type II, affirming consistent precedents that such disabilities may qualify for pension despite RMB findings.
Birendra Kumar v. UOI and Ors
The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw a writ petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue alternative legal remedies and disposed of the petition accordingly.
M/S Traffic Media (India) v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for failing to adjudicate the core breach of contract issue and lacking proper reasons, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/S Valley Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing insurer to pay enhanced insurance claim, affirming limited scope of judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and rejecting insurer's challenge based on coercion, forged documents, and surveyor's report.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sunita Tyagi & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award with minor reduction, affirming principles on negligence, future prospects, dependents, and non-deduction of insurance benefits.
MMTC Limited v. Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pty Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed MMTC's appeal challenging the maintainability of a civil suit to set aside a final arbitral award and contract addendum on grounds of fraud, affirming the exclusive jurisdiction of arbitration law and finality of arbitral awards.
GNCTD Through Department of Training and Technical Education v. M/s Human Potential Development and Research Society
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a Section 34 petition for non-filing of the Arbitral Award, affirming that such filing is mandatory and COVID-19 relaxations do not excuse procedural non-compliance.
Pawan Dube v. Deepa Tuteja & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to accept delayed affidavits accompanying the Written Statement with costs, emphasizing expeditious disposal and procedural leniency.
Chandan Kumar Sura v. Rachna Shah & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking expedited disposal of a recently filed contempt petition by the CAT, holding that no interference is warranted without evidence of delay.
Pramit Jain v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a wife who voluntarily chose to live separately, emphasizing respect for individual autonomy and allowing the petitioner to seek other remedies.
Pawan Gupta & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.