Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative v. Registrant of IFFCOFRANCHISE.COM & Ors.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:12055
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed Domain Name Registrars, banks, and law enforcement agencies to implement systemic measures including injunctions, data disclosure, and beneficiary name verification to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud via fraudulent domain names.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Domain Name Registrar Trademark Infringement Interim Injunction Cyber Fraud

Natraj Enterprises v. Commissioner of DGST and Ors.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:12009-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a GST adjudication order pending Supreme Court's decision on the validity of extension notifications, emphasizing the right to be heard and appellate remedies.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST notifications Section 168A CGST Act extension of limitation

Ong Kok Thong v. Commissioner of Customs

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:12005-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a personal hearing for the petitioner in the Customs appeal and disposed of the writ petition seeking implementation of an Order-in-Original permitting unconditional release of detained goods.

administrative petition_dismissed Article 226 Constitution of India Customs Act 1962 Order-in-Original detention of goods

M/S PADAM KISHORE AND COMPANY v. UNION OF INDIA

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:12003-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 48

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order passed without hearing the petitioner, granting opportunity to file reply and personal hearing, while leaving the validity of GST extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Natural Justice

Sight and Sound India Private Limited v. The Commissioner of SGST & Anr.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:12008-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving open the validity of GST notifications pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST Act Section 168A principles of natural justice

Globe Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of DGST and Ors.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:12007-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after the petitioner is afforded an opportunity to reply, while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A show cause notice natural justice

Sight and Sound India Private Limited v. The Commissioner of SGST & Anr.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:12006-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST tax demand order passed ex-parte due to lack of fair hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST Act Section 168A show cause notice natural justice

Rahul Bhargava & Anr. v. M/S Neo Developers Pvt Ltd

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:11842-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act is maintainable despite prior RERA remedies, emphasizing the distinct and protective nature of such reliefs to preserve arbitration's efficacy.

commercial appeal_allowed Significant Section 9 Arbitration Act RERA Act interim relief doctrine of election

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Surbhi Varshney

24 Dec 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:11905

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a public servant charged with criminal misconduct for reassessing property tax during a pending appeal, holding that reassessment was lawful under amended municipal law and absent mala fide, no criminal liability arises.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Assessment Order Reassessment

New Balance Athletics Inc. v. NBSTORESININDIA.IN & Ors.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:12067
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that unauthorized use of trademarks in domain names constitutes infringement warranting injunctions, while balancing intermediary protections and privacy laws, directing targeted enforcement against infringing domain names without blanket blocking of registrars.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant domain name infringement trademark infringement passing off domain name registrar liability

Kamdhenu Limited v. Raghunath Virdharam Bishnoi and Ors.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:12064

The Delhi High Court held that domain name registrars must comply with court orders to block infringing domain names while balancing trademark protection with privacy laws and intermediary liability under Indian law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant domain name infringement trademark infringement intermediary liability Information Technology Act, 2000

McDonalds Corporation v. National Internet Exchange of India

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:12031

Delhi High Court granted injunctions and issued systemic directions to curb fraudulent domain name registrations infringing trademarks, mandating cooperation from registrars, banks, and law enforcement to prevent cyber fraud.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Domain Name Registrar Trademark infringement Interim injunction Cyber fraud

Shoppers Stop Limited v. M/S Shopperstop & Ors.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:12029

The Delhi High Court held that domain registrars and banks must implement robust verification and compliance measures to prevent trademark infringement and financial fraud via fraudulent domain names, issuing injunctions and systemic directions to stakeholders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Domain Name Registrar Trademark infringement Interim injunction Beneficiary name lookup facility

CRESSET CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC & ANR. v. REGISTRANT OF WWW.CRESSETCAPITAL.IN, WWW.CRESSETINDIALIVE.LIVE & ORS.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:12014

The Delhi High Court held that domain name registrars must exercise due diligence and comply with court orders to prevent trademark infringement via fraudulent domain names, endorsing dynamic injunctions and coordinated multi-agency measures to combat cyber fraud.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Domain Name Registrar Trademark Infringement Dynamic Injunction Cyber Fraud

ITC LIMITED v. ASHOK KUMAR & ORS.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · CS (COMM) 373/2020
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

Delhi High Court directed domain registrars, banks, and regulatory bodies to implement systemic measures including injunctions, verification protocols, and coordinated investigations to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud via fraudulent domain names.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Domain Name Registrar Trademark Infringement Interim Injunction Cyber Fraud

TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. M/S ELECTRO INTERNATIONAL & ORS.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:12063

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions against infringing domain names, directed disclosure of registrant and payment details, and mandated systemic reforms involving DNRs, banks, and law enforcement to combat trademark infringement and cyber fraud.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Domain Name Registrar Trademark Infringement Interim Injunction Cyber Fraud

PB Fintech Limited v. Policy Bazar Finance & Ors.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:12028

Delhi High Court held that Domain Name Registrars must exercise due diligence and comply with injunctions to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud via fraudulent domain names, directing coordinated action among registrars, banks, and government agencies.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Domain Name Registrar Trademark Infringement Privacy Protect Feature Dynamic Injunction

Fashnear Technologies Private Limited v. Meesho Online Shopping Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:12061

Delhi High Court mandates systemic reforms and coordinated multi-agency action to prevent trademark infringement and financial fraud via fraudulent domain names, directing DNRs, banks, and law enforcement to implement verification and enforcement measures.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Domain Name Registrar Trademark Infringement Cyber Fraud Beneficiary Name Verification

Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Nitin Kumar Singh & Ors.

24 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:12019

Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions and issued systemic directions to curb trademark infringement and financial fraud through fraudulent domain names, emphasizing due diligence by registrars and cooperation from banks and law enforcement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Domain Name Registrar Trademark Infringement Interim Injunction Privacy Protect Feature

Shamim v. State

24 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:11986

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence for robbery under Sections 392/34 and 397 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and lawful recovery despite absence of independent witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery Section 392 IPC Section 397 IPC concurrent sentence