Delhi High Court

101,979 judgments

Year:

Rajasthan Table Tennis Association v. Table Tennis Federation of India and Ors.

12 Mar 2026 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2026:DHC:2214
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the dominant cause of action arose in Rajasthan and not Delhi.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction forum conveniens writ petition recognition order

CITIBANK N.A. v. SPECIAL DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT

12 Mar 2026 · Navin Chawla; Ravinder Dudeja · 2026:DHC:2161-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed delayed Show Cause Notices issued under FERA for alleged foreign exchange violations, holding that proceedings must be initiated within a reasonable time informed by statutory record preservation rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Show Cause Notice delay in proceedings

Dibyendu Biswas v. Green Agrevolution Pvt Ltd

12 Mar 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:2212
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's application to admit additional evidence under Section 391 Cr.P.C. in a Section 138 NI Act case, emphasizing that appellate courts should not admit evidence that could have been produced at trial due to the petitioner’s own inaction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 391 Cr.P.C. additional evidence dishonour of cheque

Sanjay Sethi and Anrs v. The State GNCT and Anrs

12 Mar 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:2197

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 63 of the Copyright Act based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution interest.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 63 Copyright Act 1957 Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement

Vansh v. State NCT of Delhi

12 Mar 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:2196

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the injured persons' no objection, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR rash and negligent driving Sections 279 and 337 IPC compromise

ITW GSE APS & Anr. v. Dabico Airport Solutions Pvt Ltd & Ors.

12 Mar 2026 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:2059
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed deletion of defendant no. 3 from a patent infringement suit, holding that a holding company is not liable for its subsidiary's acts absent exceptional circumstances.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order I Rule 10(2) CPC necessary party proper party corporate veil

Union of India & Anr v. M/S Shriram Coconut Products (P) Limited & Ors

12 Mar 2026 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2026:DHC:2145-DB

The Delhi High Court held that desiccation of coconuts amounts to preservation under Schedule I of the EPF Act, interpreting 'coconut' by its dictionary meaning as a fruit, thereby including the respondent's industry within the Act's ambit.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Schedule I fruit and vegetable preservation industry desiccated coconut

Commissioner of Customs Airport v. M/S Entire Logistics Pvt Ltd

12 Mar 2026 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Ajay Digpaul · 2026:DHC:2090-DB

The High Court dismissed the Customs Department's appeal, holding that revocation of a Customs Broker License based on an order beyond the scope of a vague show cause notice violates natural justice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 show cause notice principles of natural justice Section 130 Customs Act, 1962

Bimal Kumar Jana v. Santa Dey & Ors.

12 Mar 2026 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2026:DHC:2064-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging respondent's membership in a co-operative society, holding no disqualification under Rule 25(1)(c) of the 1973 Rules and emphasizing locus standi and limitation bar.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Co-operative Societies Rules 1973 Rule 25 disqualification locus standi limitation period

Mohd. Zia & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

12 Mar 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:2129

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary compromise between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Hanif Khan and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

12 Mar 2026 · Amit Mahajan · 2026:DHC:2080
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and related IPC provisions arising from a matrimonial dispute upon amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 528 BNSS matrimonial dispute

Neendar & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

12 Mar 2026 · Amit Mahajan · 2026:DHC:2085
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers Section 528 BNSS

Rajat Goel & Anr. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

12 Mar 2026 · Amit Mahajan · 2026:DHC:2087
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving non-compoundable offences arising from a family dispute on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR inherent powers Section 528 BNSS non-compoundable offences

Shanur Rehman v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.

12 Mar 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:2127

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following a full and final compromise between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute compromise

Vikas Datika & Ors. v. The State GNCTD & Anr.

12 Mar 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:2115

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement through mediation, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute mediation and conciliation

Renu v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr

12 Mar 2026 · Amit Sharma · 2026:DHC:2068
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that eviction under the Senior Citizens Act cannot override a woman's right to reside in a shared household under the Domestic Violence Act, setting aside an eviction order against the petitioner.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 shared household eviction

Gopal Krishan Puri v. UCO Bank

12 Mar 2026 · Amit Sharma · 2026:DHC:2067

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition, upholding the eviction petition's dismissal due to the landlord's failure to prove bona fide requirement and non-availability of alternate suitable accommodation under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property petition_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 alternate accommodation

SH Vipin Kaul v. Smt Kanta Deshwal

12 Mar 2026 · Amit Sharma · (2024) 1 High Court Cases (All) 496
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's jurisdiction under Section 9(1) of the Guardians and Wards Act, holding that the minor child's ordinary residence was Delhi at the time of filing, and dismissed the petition challenging custody proceedings.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Section 9(1) ordinary residence territorial jurisdiction

Corporation Bank v. Harvinder Singh & Ors.

12 Mar 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:2061

The Delhi High Court modified the mesne profits awarded against a public sector bank to reflect the actual wrongful gain based on the rent paid by the bank, reducing the rate from Rs.200 to Rs.138 per sq. ft., and adjusted the interest calculation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mesne profits lease agreement wrongful possession market rent

Sh. P.K. Chawla v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Mar 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:2065
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld recovery of unauthorized retrospective transport allowance paid without requisite documentation but denied interest, emphasizing judicial discretion in excess payment recovery absent fraud.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Transport Allowance Retrospective Promotion Recovery of Excess Payment Judicial Discretion