Delhi High Court
28,224 judgments
Union of India & Ors. v. A Ex JWO Ramesh Kumar Retd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type II, affirming consistent precedents that such disabilities may qualify for pension despite RMB findings.
Birendra Kumar v. UOI and Ors
The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw a writ petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue alternative legal remedies and disposed of the petition accordingly.
M/S Traffic Media (India) v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for failing to adjudicate the core breach of contract issue and lacking proper reasons, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/S Valley Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing insurer to pay enhanced insurance claim, affirming limited scope of judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and rejecting insurer's challenge based on coercion, forged documents, and surveyor's report.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sunita Tyagi & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award with minor reduction, affirming principles on negligence, future prospects, dependents, and non-deduction of insurance benefits.
MMTC Limited v. Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pty Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed MMTC's appeal challenging the maintainability of a civil suit to set aside a final arbitral award and contract addendum on grounds of fraud, affirming the exclusive jurisdiction of arbitration law and finality of arbitral awards.
GNCTD Through Department of Training and Technical Education v. M/s Human Potential Development and Research Society
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a Section 34 petition for non-filing of the Arbitral Award, affirming that such filing is mandatory and COVID-19 relaxations do not excuse procedural non-compliance.
Pawan Dube v. Deepa Tuteja & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to accept delayed affidavits accompanying the Written Statement with costs, emphasizing expeditious disposal and procedural leniency.
Chandan Kumar Sura v. Rachna Shah & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking expedited disposal of a recently filed contempt petition by the CAT, holding that no interference is warranted without evidence of delay.
Pramit Jain v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a wife who voluntarily chose to live separately, emphasizing respect for individual autonomy and allowing the petitioner to seek other remedies.
Pawan Gupta & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Muneet Chaprana & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Ajay Kumar and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Amir Ali @ Amir Ali Shawn & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, reaffirming the Court's power under Section 482 CrPC to put matrimonial disputes to rest when parties reconcile.
Ashok Kumar Goel & Ors. v. BNP Paribas Suisse SA & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that simultaneous execution of a foreign decree in India and the cause country is permissible under Section 44A CPC, dismissing objections to maintainability and upholding the decree's enforceability.
Lydia Kabukazi Aloyo v. Customs
Bail was denied to a foreign national accused of possessing commercial quantity of heroin, holding that voluntary consent exempts Magistrate’s order under Customs Act and that strict conditions under Section 37 NDPS Act govern bail in such cases.
Panchkuian Furniture Market Association v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal by shopkeepers seeking extension of lease tenure and transfer rights, holding that their 30-year lease agreements, entered into by consent, govern their rights and prohibit transfer, notwithstanding the original 99-year lease granted to DMRC.
Rajesh Sharma v. Lusent Technology Hindustan & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that no employer-employee relationship existed between the petitioner and Respondent No. 1, dismissing the writ petition challenging illegal termination and reinstatement claims.
BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd v. Kewal Krishan & Ors.
Employees who retired under the 2003 SVRS after completing 10 years of service are entitled to proportionate pension benefits payable initially by the SVRS trust and subsequently under the Pension Rules, 1972.
Ramesh Chander Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that statutory entitlement to higher Grade Pay includes consequential arrears and pension revision, directing payment of arrears with interest to the petitioner despite administrative delay.