Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Sandeep Kumar Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners' writ seeking interim relief from director disqualification due to inter se disputes, directing the ROC to adjudicate the matter and stay disqualification pending its decision.
Ramesh Kumar v. Parminder Singh
The Delhi High Court set aside the CIC’s penalty imposed on a CPIO for delayed RTI compliance, holding the penalty disproportionate due to late receipt of notices and prompt transfer of the application.
Gandharav Kharbanda v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of criminal petitions with liberty to refile upon further procedural developments under Section 173 CrPC, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn.
Rajdeep Yadav & Ors v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs arising from a property dispute after the parties amicably settled and fulfilled all obligations, emphasizing the court's power to prevent futile criminal proceedings.
Mohd Nadim v. State
Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 307 IPC based on credible injured witness testimony while reducing sentences for disproportionate punishment.
Mohd Nadim v. State
Delhi High Court upheld convictions for attempted murder based on credible injured witness testimony but reduced sentences of appellants considering their roles and circumstances.
Morepen Laboratories Limited v. M/S East West Pharma
The Delhi High Court upheld a permanent injunction against trademark infringement but dismissed the appeal seeking delivery-up of infringing goods and leave to sue for damages due to procedural and factual grounds.
Jaipal Singh v. The Land Acquisition Collector (District North-West)
The Delhi High Court held that equitable interest can be granted for delayed payment of interest under the Land Acquisition Act, directing payment at 8% for the period of delay.
M L Lakhanpal v. Darshan Lal & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the dismissal of objections to an arbitral award, affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration and upholding the closure of the appellant's right to file a statement of claim.
Lt Col Sameer Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Technical Assessment Reports cannot be imposed as mandatory eligibility criteria for permanent secondment to DGQA officers beyond the conditions prescribed in the Ministry of Defence's Office Memorandum dated 12.05.2011.
Mazhar Saleem Chandroth v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking correction of a student's name in CBSE records after result publication, holding that addition of a middle name post-certification is a prohibited change under CBSE Examination Bye-laws.
Arya Kariyatil Chendakera v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing CBSE to correct the appellant's and her parents' names in the examination records and certificate, distinguishing between name change and correction under CBSE Bye-laws.
Asha Gupta v. Inder Singhal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree holding all partners jointly and severally liable for partnership debts, rejecting inter se arrangements limiting liability towards third parties.
M/S PENTAX ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. v. M/S TECHNO FAB ENGINEERING LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a recovery suit as barred by limitation due to absence of timely acknowledgment of debt and refused to admit additional evidence post-trial.
Om Prakash v. Rajiv Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decree for recovery of a loan amount where the defendant admitted the loan but failed to prove repayment.
Rakesh Nanda v. Renu Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order on bonafide requirement grounds, dismissing tenant's challenge alleging concealment and other defenses under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Rajiv Joshi v. Anand Swaroop
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award dismissing the petitioner's claim for refund under an alleged Agreement to Sell, holding that the petitioner failed to prove execution of the agreement and payment, and that the handwriting expert's opinion alone is insufficient evidence.
Atiq Ansari v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Charge under Section 328 IPC quashed due to lack of forensic evidence, and trial court directed to preserve relevant electronic evidence under Section 91 CrPC.
K v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the grant of anticipatory bail given solely on the accused's offer to perform community service in a serious offence case under Sections 313 and 376 IPC.
Balister & Ors v. Samay Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying future prospects, appropriate multiplier, and rejecting widow's remarriage as a bar to compensation.