Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Sumer Singh & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging land acquisition proceedings, holding that acceptance of compensation and admitted possession precludes lapse of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Bijender Singh v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Commissioner of Police to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 20th July 2017 expeditiously, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Ishwar Singh & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging land acquisition proceedings, holding that acceptance of compensation and admission of possession preclude lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Savitri Dabas & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging land acquisition proceedings, holding that acceptance of compensation and admitted possession preclude claims of non-taking of physical possession under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Krishan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition holding that acceptance of compensation and admission of possession preclude lapse of acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.
Soumita Das & Ors. v. S K Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ and contempt petitions challenging the non-renewal of contractual consultant services and upheld the University's discretion to engage consultants based on qualifications and project needs without mandating continuation or payment as per prior Board Resolutions.
Prashun Jain v. Commissioner of Customs (Import & General), New Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant for knowingly using false documents in customs clearance despite his claim of limited involvement.
Vijay@ Naim Dutt v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused under Sections 419 and 395 IPC, holding that he was not named in the FIR and bail conditions were imposed to safeguard the trial.
Lalit Singh Negi v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and absence of necessity for custodial interrogation.
Soumita Das & Ors. v. S K Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ and contempt petitions challenging non-renewal of contractual consultant services and upheld the respondent University's discretion to engage consultants based on qualifications and project needs without violating interim orders.
Pappu Kumar & Kallu v. State; Deepak Sharma v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants in a narcotics case due to non-production of the mandatory FSL Form and discrepancies in prosecution evidence, emphasizing strict procedural compliance under the NDPS Act.
Micrographics India v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding the suit for recovery of payment time barred as the letter relied upon did not constitute acknowledgment of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act.
Tenzin Rabga v. Ministry of External Affairs & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of External Affairs to renew the petitioner’s identity certificate within 10 days after the respondents failed to respond to his renewal application.
Fasih Mahmood v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Fasih Mahmood in a UAPA case, holding that serious charges and ongoing trial justify denial of bail despite delayed forensic reports and absence of incriminating interim evidence.
Aseem Narain v. North East Centre for Technology Application and Reach (NECTAR) and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to submit a consolidated representation against salary deduction orders, which the respondents must consider and decide upon within a stipulated timeframe, thereby disposing of the writ petition.
Raghubir Chander Duggal v. Central Bank of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interest on delayed pensionary benefits and leave encashment for the petitioner’s wife, holding that such benefits are not payable to employees removed from service under the Bank’s pension regulations.
Dr. Abdul Sattar v. Jamia Millia Islamia
The Delhi High Court directed Jamia Millia Islamia University to reconsider the petitioner's representation challenging his retirement age and to pass a reasoned order within a stipulated timeframe.
Hanif Khan v. The Central Civil Services Board
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking regularization and creation of post for a temporary Mali employee, holding that temporary appointments without sanctioned posts cannot be regularized by mandamus, especially when junior to others denied relief.
Geeta Kumar v. Management, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee College and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent college to respond with a speaking order to the petitioner's legal notices seeking gratuity and pension within a stipulated time, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.