Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Air Traffic Controllers Guild (India) v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Airport Authority of India to reconsider its refusal to release 449 sanctioned Air Traffic Control Officer posts in light of Board approvals and staffing policies, and to communicate a final decision within twelve weeks.
Soumita Das & Ors. v. S K Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ and contempt petitions challenging non-renewal of contractual consultant services and upheld the University's discretion to engage and remunerate consultants based on project needs and qualifications.
Soumita Das & Ors. v. S K Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ and contempt petitions challenging non-renewal of contractual consultant appointments and remuneration claims, holding that contract termination based on qualifications and project needs was lawful.
Soumita Das & Ors. v. S K Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the non-renewal of contractual consultants lacking requisite qualifications, dismissed challenges to the University's advertisement and contempt petitions, and clarified that contractual engagements can be discontinued as per project needs without violating interim orders.
Soumita Das & Ors. v. S K Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the non-renewal of contractual consultants lacking requisite qualifications and rejected the challenge to the University's advertisement, holding that contractual engagements depend on project needs and qualifications without entitlement to continuation or Board resolution-based remuneration.
Soumita Das & Ors. v. S K Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ and contempt petitions challenging non-renewal of contractual consultant services and remuneration claims, holding that contract termination based on qualifications and project needs was justified without unlawful replacement or contempt.
M/S GUPTAJEE ENGINEERS & ANR v. MOTOR INDUSTRIES CO LTD (MICO)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the admission of additional documents including a Power of Attorney, holding that such admission did not prejudice the defendants and procedural rules must yield to the ends of justice.
Sunil Kumar v. Lt Governor of State of NCT Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed coordinated enforcement measures including barriers and CCTV to prevent illegal heavy vehicle movement on Khajuri Khas Pusta Road, disposing of the writ petition with implementation directions.
Mukesh Kumar v. Ranbir Singh Commissioner East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that land earmarked for community facilities in a regularization plan must not be converted to unauthorized residential use and directed municipal authorities to enforce strict compliance with the approved plan.
Mukesh Kumar v. Ranbir Singh Commissioner East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that unauthorized constructions on land earmarked for community facilities in a regularized colony violate the approved plan and must be demolished, emphasizing strict adherence to regularization layouts.
Balfour Beatty Group Limited v. Kalindee Rail Nirman (Engineers) Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the interim arbitral award that the 08.05.2013 MOUs govern arbitration but held that the 11.06.2013 MOU cannot be excluded without evidence, remanding the matter for further consideration.
S v. J
The Delhi High Court held that Family Courts have jurisdiction to entertain and formulate their own procedure, including framing issues, in applications under Section 26 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in pending matrimonial proceedings.
Sanjeev Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to consider the petitioner’s pending representations within a stipulated time and maintain status quo in service conditions pending decision.
Muskan & Others v. Anil Chawla & Others
The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction to interfere with actions taken by banks under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, and parties cannot challenge such actions in a partition suit.
Harish Kumar Bhalla v. Mannu Talwar
The Delhi High Court held that a subsequent buyer with no privity of contract with the owner and limited contractual remedies against the builder is not a necessary party to a suit between the owner and builder for possession and injunction.
Raghu Hari Dalmia v. Reserve Bank of India
The Delhi High Court held that a wilful defaulter must be furnished with relied upon documents and allowed legal representation during Committee proceedings to ensure natural justice.
Gaurav Dalmia v. Reserve Bank of India
The Delhi High Court held that a person facing wilful defaulter proceedings must be furnished with all relied upon documents and allowed legal representation to ensure compliance with natural justice.
Unit Run Canteen Employees Welfare Association v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal to refer a dispute involving Unit Run Canteen employees to the Industrial Tribunal, affirming that such employees are not government employees under the Supreme Court’s ruling in R.R.Pillai’s case.
Sanjay @ Arun v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for kidnapping, rape, and trafficking of a minor, affirming the prosecutrix's credible testimony and school records as sufficient proof of age and offences despite minor discrepancies and absence of medical evidence.
Sushil Kumar Gupta v. Jindal Charitable Trust
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant had no tenancy rights independent of the original tenant and that possession taken pursuant to a lawful eviction order was valid.