Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. CHRYSCAPITAL LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing disputes, affirming that functional dissimilarity and unusual events justify such exclusions absent substantial questions of law.
Mahender @ Ganja v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions in a gang rape case based on credible victim testimony corroborated by DNA evidence, despite minor investigative lapses and eyewitness doubts.
Anshul Malik v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's third anticipatory bail application in a rape case, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and suppression of material facts.
Ganesh Sagar Dimbar v. Presidents Secretariat and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the appointing authority to consider the petitioner's representation for appointment in the OBC category and pass a reasoned order within a stipulated time.
Ajay Kumar Sinha v. Indraprastha Power Generation Company Limited & Pragati Power Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court directed respondent corporations to reconsider petitioners' representations for antedating promotions based on upgraded APARs with a speaking order, emphasizing adherence to DoPT guidelines and principles of natural justice.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Pawan Sehgal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal, reducing compensation by disallowing future prospects addition due to lack of evidence, while upholding other heads of damages in a motor accident claim.
Central Government Employess Residents Welfare Association v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CPWD to consider and respond to the petitioner's representation regarding the declaration of government quarters as unsafe by passing a reasoned speaking order within a stipulated time.
Dinesh Kothari & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking court-monitored investigation into alleged FDI policy violations by e-commerce companies, holding that enforcement agencies are already taking appropriate action under FEMA.
Union of India v. B.C. Kailay
The Delhi High Court held that a government servant removed from service with immediate effect is not entitled to leave encashment under CCS Leave Rules, and equity jurisdiction cannot override clear statutory provisions.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. CHRYSCAPITAL LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the income tax appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against ChrysCapital Ltd. and Chrys Capital Investment Advisors, referring to its earlier judgment in ITA 634/2017.
Mulkh Raj v. Tata Power DDL/NDPL
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's finding that the appellant committed direct theft of electricity based on credible inspection and evidence.
BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. RISALO DEVI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to reduce compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing personal expense deduction, reducing non-pecuniary damages, and lowering interest rate, directing structured disbursement to claimants.
Universal Sompo Gen Ins Co Ltd v. Ravinder Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award, rejecting contributory negligence and upholding the quantum of damages.
Rakesh Nanda v. Renu Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order on the ground of landlord's bonafide requirement under the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing tenant's challenge alleging concealment and speculative acquisition.
Kishan Lal v. RK Associates and Anr
The court held that a suit involving title and possession disputes must be challenged by regular civil appeal under Section 96 CPC, not by revision under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, and converted the revision petition into an appeal.
Kishan Lal v. RK Associates and Anr
The court held that a revision petition under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act is not maintainable against a decree granting possession and mesne profits when the suit is not solely under that section, and directed the petition to be treated as a regular civil appeal.
Nitika Kandhari Guleria v. Harbans Singh Guleria
The Delhi High Court held that civil courts retain jurisdiction to try possession suits by owners despite pending proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and rejected the plea to dismiss the plaint on that ground.
Archana Gaur & Anr. v. Sunny Gupta
The High Court held that the trial court may admit additional evidence upon remand notwithstanding prior appellate refusal, and dismissed the transfer petition, allowing the petitioners to prove exclusive parking rights.
Commissioner of Customs v. SAP India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside CESTAT's remand order and directed the Tribunal to decide the appeals on merits, including jurisdiction, without deferring to prior High Court decisions.
Essel Vision Productions Ltd. v. Manisha Kulshreshtha
The Delhi High Court stayed an ex parte injunction restraining the release of a film alleging copyright infringement, holding that injunctions require consideration of prima facie case, irreparable injury, and balance of convenience.