Gandharav Kharbanda v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

Delhi High Court · 16 Apr 2018 · 2018:DHC:8667
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(CRL) 2733/2016
2018:DHC:8667
criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of criminal petitions with liberty to refile upon further procedural developments under Section 173 CrPC, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn.

Full Text
Translation output
$41 to43 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 2733/2016 & Crl.M.A.No.14572/2016
GANDHARAV KHARBANDA Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rake sh Maihotra, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Ms.Jyoti Babbar, Advocate
Mr.Anwesh Madhukar and Ms.Pranjal Shekhar, Advocates for R-
W.P.(CRL) 2735/2016 & CrI.M.A.No.14575/2016
TAGORE KHARBANDA Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Maihotra, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents , W.P.(CRL) 2740/2016 & Crl.M.A.No.14599/2016
VIKRAM KHARBANDA Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rakesh Maihotra, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents
CORAM:
2018:DHC:8667 I ~/
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
16.04.2018 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions in case repert under Section 173 TP€ is filed against the petitioners and cognizance thereon is taken or in case charges are framed against the petitioners.
Leave and liberty granted.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA tUPTA, J.
APRIL 16, 2018 mamftz 2018:DHC:8667
JUDGMENT