Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Mahender Kumar v. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd

06 Jul 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:3966-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition and upheld that disputes classified as industrial disputes must be adjudicated by Labour Courts, not civil courts, and writ jurisdiction cannot be used to re-open such matters.

labor appeal_dismissed industrial dispute Labour Court jurisdiction Article 226 civil court jurisdiction

Deepak Chaudhary v. State & Anr.

06 Jul 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:3963

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving rape and related offences, holding that serious crimes cannot be quashed on the basis of compromise under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR rape offence compromise in criminal cases

Rajesh Bajaj alias Rajesh Kumar v. State & Anr.

06 Jul 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:3964

The Delhi High Court held that once a revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C. is decided, the petitioner cannot invoke Section 482 Cr.P.C. to re-challenge the framing of charges under Section 498A IPC, dismissing the petition for lack of special circumstances.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 482 CrPC Section 397 CrPC framing of charges

Roshan Lal Kalra & Anr v. State & Anr

06 Jul 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:3965

The Delhi High Court refused to quash criminal proceedings involving forgery of valuable security despite settlement between parties, emphasizing the overriding public interest in prosecuting serious offences.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR forgery valuable security

Santosh Chawla & Anr v. State & Anr

06 Jul 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:3962

The Delhi High Court refused to quash criminal proceedings involving forgery and related offences despite a settlement between parties, emphasizing the overriding public interest in prosecuting serious crimes.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR inherent jurisdiction forgery

PREMPAL & ANR. v. STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS.

05 Jul 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:9108

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking protection against alleged threats, holding that routine police surveillance of individuals listed as 'Bad Characters' is lawful and not malafide.

criminal petition_dismissed police surveillance bad character list statutory duty threats

Sanjay Jha v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Jul 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:9107

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking further investigation into a crime involving a child, relying on assurances of ongoing police inquiry and the State's duty to ensure citizen safety.

criminal petition_dismissed police investigation petition for investigation State duty security and safety

M/S JVG Finance Ltd. v. Mr. Vivek Omprakash Abrol

05 Jul 2018 · Jayant Nath, J. · 2018:DHC:3930

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's claim as a bona fide purchaser of a flat sold by a party without title, holding that forged documents cannot confer title and directed the Official Liquidator to take possession as per winding-up orders.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide purchaser title transfer winding up Official Liquidator

ERA INFRA ENGINEERING LIMITED v. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA

05 Jul 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:3928

The Delhi High Court held that a former employee appointed as arbitrator is not ineligible under the Seventh Schedule and dismissed the petition seeking termination of his mandate, allowing challenges on impartiality to be raised before the arbitral tribunal.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14 Seventh Schedule Fifth Schedule

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Krishna

05 Jul 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:3927

The Delhi High Court reduced the motor accident compensation by applying 15% of the deceased's income including future prospects and disallowed loss of love and affection following Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of estate future prospects

Faisal Shahid & Anr. v. Khalil-Ur-Rehman & Ors.

05 Jul 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:3920

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking declaration of ownership based on an unproven oral gift under Mohammedan Law, emphasizing the need for credible evidence and proper proof of execution.

civil appeal_dismissed oral gift hiba Mohammedan Law declaration of ownership

Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited v. Mayuri Ben M. Chotai

05 Jul 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:3921

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that a legal heir licensee is entitled to be considered for renewal of catering licenses and awarded damages for wrongful denial of renewal.

civil petition_dismissed Significant license renewal legal heir arbitration jurisdiction arbitral award

L R Vishwanath v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors

05 Jul 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:3929

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash proceedings under Section 138 NI Act, holding that disputed factual issues must be tried and not decided at the summoning stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC Article 227 Constitution of India quashing petition

Sita Ram & Anr. v. State of Delhi

05 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:3912-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable prosecution evidence and lack of corroboration, emphasizing the necessity of proof beyond reasonable doubt for conviction under Section 302/34 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention benefit of doubt

State v. Sanjay Kumar & Ors.

05 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:3910-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal due to inconsistent eyewitness accounts and medical evidence, affirming the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused in a murder case.

criminal appeal_dismissed benefit of doubt eyewitness testimony medical evidence hostile witness

Bundu Khan & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi)

05 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:3913-DB

The Delhi High Court modified murder convictions to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, recognizing sudden provocation and heat of passion in a fatal stabbing case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder sudden provocation heat of passion

Ajay @ Gadnu v. State

05 Jul 2018 · Vipin Sanghi; P. S. Teji · 2018:DHC:3909-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC based on reliable eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence, rejecting the claim of sudden fight under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder single eyewitness testimony Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC

Delhi Flying Club Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Jul 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:3926

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Delhi Flying Club's petition seeking mandamus to constitute the Airport Appellate Tribunal and stay eviction, holding that repeated petitions without fresh grounds constitute abuse of process and that the Airport Authority of India lawfully terminated the expired license.

administrative petition_dismissed Airport Authority of India license termination eviction Airport Appellate Tribunal

Naresh S/o. Sh. Ram Kishan & Ors. v. State

05 Jul 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:3925

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for accused in a firearm injury case under Section 307 IPC, emphasizing the gravity of offence and subsequent related criminal acts.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC attempt to murder Section 307 IPC

Satish Kumar Gupta v. Shanti Swaroop Gupta and Ors.

05 Jul 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:3906

The Delhi High Court dismissed Satish Kumar Gupta's suit for declaration of ownership of property on grounds of the Benami Act and lack of registered title, while allowing ISKCON's probate petition to proceed without deciding the Will's validity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 ownership declaration immoveable property probate jurisdiction