Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
EIH Ltd. & Anr. v. Sahana Realty Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction over trademark infringement suit involving real estate project in Mumbai due to part cause of action arising in Delhi through defendants' marketing and consumer confusion.
Vipin Kaushik @ Vicky & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside charges against the mother-in-law in a dowry harassment and suicide case due to lack of prima facie evidence, emphasizing the need for grave suspicion before framing charges.
DELHI SIMLA CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE v. LT. GOVERNOR CUM ADMINISTRATOR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years despite possession, entitling the petitioner to compensation despite title disputes.
Gopi Goyal & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement reached through mediation, emphasizing that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.
Ravinder Pal Singh Bedi v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on a settlement and non-prosecution, directing release of deposited funds for the minor child's benefit.
Deepak v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of sexual offences after investigation completion and contradictory call records, imposing conditions to protect the trial and complainant.
Dhian Nath Kapur v. Pran Nath Kapur
The Delhi High Court held that partition by metes and bounds of a jointly owned property is permissible despite the Will's conditions, subject to feasibility, and appointed a Local Commissioner to suggest modes of partition.
M/S SBS BIOTECH(UNIT II) & ORS v. M/S SAMPHIRE FOOD & PHARMA (P) LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against the Defendant for infringing the Plaintiff's registered packaging and bottle design, holding that prior user rights require proof of use of the specific trade dress, not just the word mark.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Bench and Bar Association
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellate order quashing eviction of the respondent from public premises due to defective notice, upheld the eviction order subject to stay for alternate land allotment representations, and struck down damages levied without basis.
Anoop Singh v. Gopal Krishan Bhuradia & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that forfeiture of earnest money under an agreement to sell requires proof of loss by the seller and allowed refund of the earnest money paid where no loss was proved.
Pawan Kumar v. Staff Selection Commission and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate cannot challenge the tentative answer-key of a recruitment exam after the prescribed deadline, dismissing the petition seeking correction and additional marks.
Uma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed three bail applications as withdrawn upon the petitioners' counsel seeking leave to withdraw the petitions.
Sanjeev Aggarwal v. State
The Delhi High Court cancelled anticipatory bail granted to petitioners for non-compliance with court-ordered conditions to provide basic utilities to the complainant's flat, rendering the property uninhabitable.
GAIL (INDIA) LTD. v. S. K. JAIN
The Delhi High Court held that it lacks pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award of Rs. 14.55 lakhs and transferred the matter to the District Court, clarifying the scope of Section 42 of the Arbitration Act.
Union of India v. Jag Mohan Chhabra
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a Government land allotment scheme after contract conclusion entitles applicants to damages, dismissing the Government's appeal against the Trial Court's decree.
Neetu Barua v. Manas Barua
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal against the dismissal of her interim maintenance applications under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, holding that she was capable of maintaining herself and had concealed her true income.
Paprika Food Private Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the voluntary winding up petition of Paprika Food Private Limited after finding full compliance with statutory requirements and no outstanding liabilities.
SRS Investments Bengal Tiger Ltd v. Rahul Todi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act can coexist with execution proceedings under Section 36, directing the continuation of interim orders until modified by the executing court.
Nitya Kukreja v. ABW Infrastructure Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed an application to transfer winding-up proceedings to the NCLT after the Official Liquidator was appointed and assets taken into custody, holding that such transfer is not permissible at this stage.
Chander Dutt Sharma v. Prem Chand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding concurrent findings that possession with GPA and Agreement to Sell does not confer title, and the appellant failed to prove ownership or possession to recover immovable property.