Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Bijay Paper Traders Ltd. v. Ana Print O Grafix Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition as barred by limitation, holding that C-Forms do not constitute acknowledgment of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Praveen Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to grant recovery rights against the driver and owner for driving without a valid licence despite absence of conviction, based on their failure to respond to procedural notices.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Sahajhan Khatoon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal to reduce compensation awarded for death in a motor accident by applying correct deductions, future prospects, multiplier, and non-pecuniary damages as per Supreme Court precedents.
Anita Yadav & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying 40% future prospects and minimum wages for income assessment, but dismissed claims for vehicle damage as the vehicle was uninsured.
Anita Yadav & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying 40% future prospects addition and assessing income based on minimum wages for a deceased driving an uninsured vehicle, while dismissing claims for vehicle damage compensation.
United India Ins Co Ltd v. Ankit Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court partially allowed insurer's appeal and enhanced compensation for future medical expenses in a motor accident claim involving a student with permanent disability, disallowing future income loss but increasing medical cost award based on expert evidence.
Ten Creative Studio Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Nelson Planning & Design Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that counter claims in arbitration are barred by limitation unless the respondent had earlier sought arbitration by serving notice, and dismissed the appellants' appeal challenging the rejection of their counter claims on limitation grounds.
Amandeep Singh Hans v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR under Section 25 Arms Act, holding that the defense of inadvertent possession must be tested at trial and the High Court should not interfere after cognizance and charge sheet filing.
Pankaj Sharma v. State
The High Court dismissed the petition seeking direction for FIR registration, holding that in absence of special circumstances and after dismissal of revision, the Magistrate's pre-summoning inquiry and refusal to direct police investigation was lawful.
Union of India & Anr. v. N.K. Widhani
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of NRIs to damages for breach of contract following the Government’s cancellation of a land allotment scheme despite prior writ petition dismissals, dismissing the Government’s appeal.
Union of India v. KanhiyaLal Kewalramani
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's award of damages to NRIs for breach of contract following cancellation of a Government land allotment scheme, holding that prior writ petitions do not bar civil suits for compensation.
Union of India v. Baldev Singh Narula
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's decree awarding damages to an NRI applicant after the Government cancelled a land allotment scheme despite concluded contracts, dismissing the Government's appeal.
Union of India v. Gurvinder Singh Narula
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a Government land allotment scheme after applicants fulfilled all formalities constituted breach of contract entitling them to damages, dismissing the Government's appeal.
Union of India v. Amleek Ratan
The Delhi High Court upheld civil claims for damages against the Government for cancelling a land allotment scheme to NRIs, ruling that contractual rights had vested despite prior writ petition dismissals.
Union of India & Anr. v. Dev Raj Goel
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a Government land allotment scheme does not bar civil suits for specific performance or damages when applicants have concluded contracts by fulfilling all formalities.
Union of India & Anr. v. Harjinder Singh Duggal
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a Government land allotment scheme does not extinguish concluded contracts with NRIs, entitling them to specific performance or damages, and dismissed the Government's appeal against the Trial Court decree.
Union of India v. Dr. Arun Kumar Nigam
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a Government land allotment scheme does not bar civil suits for specific performance or damages when applicants have fulfilled contractual formalities, and upheld damages awarded to an NRI applicant.
Union of India v. Satish Kumar Mittal
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a Government land allotment scheme does not bar civil suits for damages when applicants have fulfilled contractual formalities, and upheld compensation awarded to the Respondent.
Union of India v. Jyoti Parmanand Wadhwani
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of NRIs to damages for breach of a Government land allotment scheme contract despite cancellation of the scheme, dismissing the Government's appeal.
Union of India v. H. N. Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of NRIs to damages for breach of a concluded contract under a cancelled land allotment scheme, dismissing the Government's appeal.