Delhi High Court

58,461 judgments

Year:

Amar Yadav & Ors. v. State & Anr.

26 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4540

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a family dispute after the parties amicably settled their differences, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile and contrary to the ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR family dispute Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement

Surya Kant Tyagi v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

26 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4532

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A and 509 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 354A IPC Section 509 IPC settlement

Vikram & Ors v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

26 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4533

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406 and 498A IPC arising from matrimonial discord on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 406 IPC Section 498A IPC matrimonial discord

Rahul & Anr v. The State & Anr

26 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4541

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial discord Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Lalit Singh v. The State of NCT of Delhi; Balbir Singh v. The State of NCT of Delhi

26 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel

The Delhi High Court allowed Lalit Singh's appeal granting juvenile benefit and reduced Balbir Singh's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder based on the accused's age and circumstances of the attack.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Juvenile Justice Act benefit of juvenile culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 302 IPC

Rakesh Kumar v. State (GNCTD)

26 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:4543-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of the appellant, holding that failure to explain a homicidal death in the matrimonial home under Section 106 Indian Evidence Act, coupled with complete circumstantial evidence, justifies conviction under Section 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 106 Indian Evidence Act circumstantial evidence homicidal death

Tanuj Arora v. Priya @ Patricia Herrera

26 Jul 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:4569-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal and granted divorce on the ground of desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, setting aside the Family Court's dismissal.

family appeal_allowed Significant divorce mental cruelty desertion Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

ANAND RAO INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. v. ABB INDIA LIMITED

26 Jul 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:4549

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that electronic evidence was admissible under Section 65B and procedural defects in authorization were curable by ratification.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Section 65B Indian Evidence Act Electronic evidence admissibility

Bhagwati Yadav & Ors v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

26 Jul 2018 · A.K. Pathak · 2018:DHC:8367

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in the interest of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement matrimonial dispute

Puran v. State

26 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:4552-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, holding that the killing occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation or cruel conduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC culpable homicide murder

Baljit Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

26 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:4534-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of charges under Sections 325/34 and 323/34 IPC due to lack of corroborative evidence and inconsistencies in eyewitness testimonies.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 325 IPC Section 323 IPC Section 34 IPC grievous hurt

Ambeek Khemka v. Jaswant Singh & Anr.

26 Jul 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:4531

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a person who only witnessed a loan agreement and did not execute any security documents is not liable for repayment of the loan.

civil appeal_dismissed loan agreement liability witness to contract promissory note

Saddam v. State

26 Jul 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:4560

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for attempt to murder and causing disappearance of evidence but reduced the sentence under Section 307 IPC from seven to four years.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 307 IPC Section 201 IPC grievous injury attempt to murder

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Baby Divija & Ors.

26 Jul 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:4547
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal, reducing motor accident compensation by deducting income tax, limiting future prospects addition to 50%, adjusting non-pecuniary damages, and lowering interest to 9% per annum in line with Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency future prospects income tax deduction motor accident compensation

Sartaj v. State

26 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:4545-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder committed in furtherance of common intention, relying on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC murder common intention

Indoco Remedies Limited v. Union of India and Anr.

26 Jul 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:4553

The Delhi High Court held that a CETIRIZINE syrup formulation with minor strength variation is a scheduled formulation under DPCO-2013 and subject to NPPA's price ceiling, dismissing the petition challenging overcharge recovery.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Drugs (Price Control) Order 2013 scheduled formulation non-scheduled formulation ceiling price

Raj Zutshi v. State

26 Jul 2018 · Manmohan · 2018:DHC:4542

The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly executed Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act to the petitioner, the named executor and sole beneficiary, in absence of any objections.

civil petition_allowed probate Indian Succession Act Will executor

Yamin v. State

26 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:4546-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and related charges due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete and reliable chain of circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen motive Section 302 IPC

Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Jul 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:4559
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate commercial disputes or pass binding monetary orders, setting aside the impugned order against the petitioner.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant National Commission for Scheduled Castes Article 338 Constitution of India jurisdiction commercial dispute

Prem Kaur v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Jul 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:4565-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed land acquisition notifications issued beyond the statutory period after quashing of earlier declarations, holding that acquisition proceedings without possession or compensation are invalid.

property petition_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 6 notification quashing of acquisition notification statutory period