Full Text
Translation output
A r $-9 to 11 (common order)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 2513/2015 and Crl.M.A.8712/2015,14242-14243/2015
ANURAG DIKSmX Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna Senior Advocate with Mr. Venkatesh Rao &
Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Advocate
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 2513/2015 and Crl.M.A.8712/2015,14242-14243/2015
ANURAG DIKSmX Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna Senior Advocate with Mr. Venkatesh Rao &
Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI &ANR. Respondents . , Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State
^ Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Adv. with Ms. Anamika Niyazi, Adv. for R-2.
^ Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Adv. with Ms. Anamika Niyazi, Adv. for R-2.
CRL.M.C. 2514/2015 and Crl.M.A.8714/2015
NEXT EDUCATION INDIA P. LTD. & ORS Petitioners
NEXT EDUCATION INDIA P. LTD. & ORS Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OFNCTOFDELHI & ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Adv. with
^ Ms. Anamika Niyazi, Adv. for R-2.
Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Adv. with
^ Ms. Anamika Niyazi, Adv. for R-2.
CRL.M.C. 2515/2015 and Crl.M.A.8716/2015
SACHIN DHAKATE & ORS. Petitioners
SACHIN DHAKATE & ORS. Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OFNCTOFDELHI & ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Adv. with
Ms. Anamika Niyazi, Adv. for R-2.
Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Adv. with
Ms. Anamika Niyazi, Adv. for R-2.
CRL.MG. 2513/2015 Etc. Page1 of2
2018:DHC:8346 ) v LC
2018:DHC:8346 ) v LC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
26.07.2018 After some hearing, the learned senior counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) and the applications filed therewith, seeking quashing of the investigation into case FIR No.147/2014, registered under Section 66 of the Information
Technology Act, 2000 ofPolice Station EOW Mandir Marg, New Delhi, the petitioners reserving their contentions set out in these petitions to be agitated at appropriate stage of consideration of charge, his request being that the interim protection against coercive steps which were granted by interim orders in these proceedings may be extended by a week so that the petitioners have the opportunity to approach the appropriate forum for further relief in that regard, . The petitions and the applications filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn.
The interim orders against coercive steps will inure to the benefit of the petitioners for a week from now.
GAUBA, J JULY 26, 2018 vk
26.07.2018 After some hearing, the learned senior counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) and the applications filed therewith, seeking quashing of the investigation into case FIR No.147/2014, registered under Section 66 of the Information
Technology Act, 2000 ofPolice Station EOW Mandir Marg, New Delhi, the petitioners reserving their contentions set out in these petitions to be agitated at appropriate stage of consideration of charge, his request being that the interim protection against coercive steps which were granted by interim orders in these proceedings may be extended by a week so that the petitioners have the opportunity to approach the appropriate forum for further relief in that regard, . The petitions and the applications filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn.
The interim orders against coercive steps will inure to the benefit of the petitioners for a week from now.
GAUBA, J JULY 26, 2018 vk
CRL.M.C. 2513/2015 Etc. Page 2 of2
2018:DHC:8346
2018:DHC:8346
JUDGMENT