Delhi High Court

58,461 judgments

Year:

Shiv Kumar v. Union of India

27 Jul 2018 · G. S. Sistani; P. S. Teji · 2018:DHC:4590-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, stand lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to non-payment of compensation despite possession being taken.

property petition_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2) possession

MEJA URJA NIGAM PVT LTD v. RATNA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PVT LTD

27 Jul 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:4586

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's refusal to grant interim security or bank guarantee due to lack of prima facie case and clarified that the tribunal cannot review its own orders under Section 17, directing detailed asset disclosure by the respondent.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim relief Companies Act, 2013 compliance bank guarantee

Dr Rahul Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Jul 2018 · G. S. Sistani; P. S. Teji · 2018:DHC:4611-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the cancellation of appointment on medical unfitness grounds, holding that employer-prescribed medical standards are binding and uniformly applicable to all candidates including engineers.

employment appeal_dismissed pre-employment medical examination medical fitness appointment cancellation employment standards

AR v. M/S SHRI COLONIZERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD

27 Jul 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:4585

Defendants granted leave to defend a summary suit for cheque dishonour only upon depositing the cheque amount, reaffirming that forfeiture of advance payments requires proof of loss under Indian Contract Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 37 CPC post-dated cheques leave to defend forfeiture of advance

Ravi v. State

27 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:4572-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove the chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed circumstantial evidence last seen theory recovery of weapon bloodstained shirt

Salauddin @ Nuroo v. State

27 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:4573-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Salauddin, upholding his conviction and life sentence for the murder of Ashok based on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony hostile witnesses

Surender Kumar v. Girish Kapoor & Ors.

27 Jul 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:4606

The Delhi High Court allowed the second appeal to decree recovery of Rs.70,000 with interest based on unchallenged payment receipts, setting aside prior judgments dismissing the claim for money recovery under an Agreement to Sell.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement to sell proof of payment receipts

Anoop Kumar v. State

27 Jul 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:4571-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and evidence tampering charges due to failure of prosecution to conclusively prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt in a circumstantial evidence case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence benefit of doubt Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC

Anjani Technopast Ltd & Ors. v. Shubh Gautam

27 Jul 2018 · G. S. Sistani; P. S. Teji · 2018:DHC:4614-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the summary decree under Order XXXVII CPC where the appellants failed to file timely leave to defend and did not honor settlement terms.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit dishonour of cheque

Jai Kishan v. Anamika

27 Jul 2018 · G. S. Sistani; P. S. Teji · 2018:DHC:4613-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order under Section 125 CrPC, affirming the husband's duty to maintain his wife despite his financial obligations towards his parents and the wife's exemption from filing detailed income documents.

family appeal_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Section 125 CrPC Family Courts Act, 1984 exemption from filing income documents

Zeman Technogroup v. Union of India

27 Jul 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:4603-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of arbitral damages awarded without evidence while maintaining refund of wrongly encashed bank guarantees, dismissing appeals by both parties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant International arbitration Arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration Act Damages

MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. DEVKI DEVI & ORS

27 Jul 2018 · J.R. Midha

The Delhi High Court enhanced the motor accident compensation by applying the actual income with future prospects and reduced certain heads of damages in line with Supreme Court precedent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of dependency loss of consortium

Roshan Lal v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 Jul 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:4610

The Delhi High Court refused to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 354A, 354D, 354, and 509 IPC despite a settlement, emphasizing the public interest in prosecuting offences involving sexual harassment and mental depravity.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. sexual harassment Section 354A IPC Section 354D IPC

Praneet Singh Davar v. L S Davar & Co

27 Jul 2018 · Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:4604-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a prima facie opinion in an interim order does not influence rectification proceedings before the Registrar of Trademarks and directed independent adjudication thereof.

civil appeal_dismissed interim order prima facie opinion rectification proceedings Registrar of Trademarks

Sanjay Bansal v. Kusum Lata Jain

27 Jul 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:4605

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the dismissal of a forgery complaint under Section 340 Cr.P.C. in eviction proceedings, directing the petitioner to pursue appeal under Section 341 Cr.P.C. before the Rent Control Tribunal.

civil petition_dismissed Additional Rent Controller Section 340 Cr.P.C. Section 341 Cr.P.C. Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

Anil Kumar Jain v. Shiam CGHS Limited & Ors.

27 Jul 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:4607-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Cooperative Tribunal’s order rejecting the petitioner’s claim of membership and cash payments to a cooperative society due to lack of credible evidence.

civil petition_dismissed Cooperative Society membership cash payment proof share certificate Delhi Cooperative Tribunal

Vineeta v. Pradeep Kumar & Ors

27 Jul 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:4612

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal enhancing compensation for motor accident injuries by setting aside contributory negligence and applying correct disability and income assessments.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement contributory negligence functional disability

Lt. Governor and Ors. v. Shadilal Enterprises Ltd. and Ors.

27 Jul 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:4593

The Delhi High Court held that only the Lieutenant Governor's approval is binding in government liquor supply tenders, and suppliers who accepted and performed contracts at the approved rate cannot claim higher prices based on negotiating committee recommendations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Tender Negotiating Committee Lieutenant Governor Country liquor supply Contract acceptance

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Kamla Chauhan & Ors.

27 Jul 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:4594

The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer’s appeal, reducing compensation awarded in a motor accident claim due to invalid driving licence and recalibrating future prospects and non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim driving licence validity future prospects non-pecuniary damages

Roshini v. State

27 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4584

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused under Sections 328, 307, and 34 IPC, relying on CCTV evidence and absence from the scene to prevent wrongful arrest.

criminal bail_granted anticipatory bail false implication CCTV evidence Section 307 IPC