Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Mohd Ashhar v. Zeeshan Zama Khan & Anr.

14 Aug 2018 · Jayant Nath, J. · 2018:DHC:5124

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining defendants from alienating property pending trial in a suit for specific performance, finding the plaintiff established a prima facie case and risk of irreparable harm.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance interim injunction possession agreement to sell

Bharat Carpets Ltd. v. Official Liquidator

14 Aug 2018 · JAYANT NATH · 2018:DHC:5125

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a revival scheme under the Companies Act, affirming that compliance with statutory procedures and majority approval suffice for sanction despite minority objections and pending related winding up issues.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Scheme of Revival Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 winding up

Rahul Wadhwani v. Planman Consulting (I) Private Limited

14 Aug 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:5123

The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding-up petition due to a bona fide dispute over unpaid consultancy fees, directing the petitioner to seek remedy through civil proceedings.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant winding-up petition bona fide dispute Companies Act 1956 consultancy fees

Ramesh Chandra; Sanjay Chandra v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

14 Aug 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:5121-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued beyond the six-year limitation period under the Income Tax Act must be preceded by notice and opportunity of hearing to the affected assessee, quashing the impugned notices and order for non-compliance.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Section 149

Ramesh Chandra v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax; Sanjay Chandra v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

14 Aug 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:5122-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued beyond the six-year limitation period under Section 150 of the Income Tax Act are invalid unless the assessee is given prior notice and opportunity of hearing before adverse appellate findings are recorded.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Section 149

Union of India & Ors. v. Jugnu Jayant

14 Aug 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:5119-DB

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal, upholding forfeiture of security deposit for one contract while setting aside the arbitral award for others due to improper interpretation of contractual clauses governing penalties.

commercial_arbitration appeal_partly_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37(1)(b) Commercial Courts Act, 2015

Kavita v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited & Anr

14 Aug 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:5120

The Delhi High Court upheld IOCL's seniority list based on LOI issuance dates under amended COCO Guidelines and dismissed the writ petition challenging allotment of a retail outlet.

administrative petition_dismissed Letter of Intent Seniority list Retail outlet allotment Corpus Fund Scheme

Praveen Gupta & Anr. v. State & Anr.

14 Aug 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:5118

The Delhi High Court held that evidence recorded during pre-summoning inquiry cannot be adopted at trial for framing charges, quashing the impugned order and directing fresh proceedings in accordance with law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 200 Cr.P.C. Section 244 Cr.P.C. framing of charges pre-summoning inquiry

Brij Lal & Sons v. Union of India

14 Aug 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:5117

The Delhi High Court held that pendency of an appeal against an arbitral award does not justify adjourning execution proceedings sine die and directed the Executing Court to proceed with execution on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Execution of arbitral award Order XXI Rule 58 CPC Adjournment sine die Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

M/S SUBHASH INFRAENGINEERS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

14 Aug 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:5116-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award denying price variation benefits for contract extensions attributable to the contractor's delay and dismissed the appeal challenging the award.

commercial appeal_dismissed Significant price variation clause extension of time arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration Act

M/S SPEEDCRAFTS LIMITED v. THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS

14 Aug 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:5109

The Delhi High Court held that service tax introduced after contract execution is reimbursable only if the contract so provides, but reimbursement claims are not maintainable unless the tax is actually paid.

civil petition_dismissed Significant service tax contract interpretation tax liability Finance Act 1994

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CD-II v. M/S J.K. ENGINEERS

14 Aug 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:5115

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award applying market rates for substituted contract items as per contractual clause, dismissing the petition challenging the payment rate.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitral award substituted item market rate CPWD rates

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Srin Niwas Shukla

14 Aug 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5110
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of insurer's recovery rights under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act and enhanced compensation and interest awarded to the injured claimant in a motor accident case.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 66(3)(p) compensation enhancement future prospects

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Srin Niwas Shukla

14 Aug 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5111
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of insurer's recovery rights under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act, enhanced compensation for grievous injury with permanent disability, and increased interest on the awarded amount to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 66(3)(p) Recovery rights Compensation enhancement

Hirendra Gupta v. Land & Building Department and Ors

14 Aug 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5114

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking allotment of residential plots due to unexplained delay and laches, relying on Supreme Court precedent to deny relief without examining merits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant delay laches mandamus writ petition

Dalip Singh & Anr v. Tulsi Ram (Deceased) Through Lrs

14 Aug 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:5127

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Second Appeal against a decree for recovery of possession, holding that no substantial question of law arose and upholding concurrent findings of fact by lower courts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Second Appeal Section 100 CPC Concurrent findings of fact Substantial question of law

Bhagwat Singh Meena v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

14 Aug 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:5126

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 16 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, punishment must include both imprisonment and fine, and a criminal court cannot review its sentence order except for clerical errors, setting aside the illegal sentence and remanding for fresh sentencing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 Section 16 sentence imprisonment

Worlds Window Infrastructure & Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Warehousing Corporation

14 Aug 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:5104

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the arbitrator’s appointment by the Managing Director under the Arbitration Act, rejected challenges to her independence and impartiality, and dismissed the petitioner’s petitions seeking termination of the arbitrator’s mandate.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Arbitrator appointment Managing Director Fifth Schedule

Worlds Window Infrastructure & Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Warehousing Corporation

14 Aug 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:5105

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of an arbitrator’s appointment by the Managing Director under the arbitration agreement, rejected allegations of bias and procedural irregularities, and dismissed the petitioner’s challenge to the arbitrator’s mandate.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Arbitrator appointment Managing Director Fifth Schedule

Babinder Singh Maan & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

14 Aug 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:5102

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a trivial dispute after the parties amicably settled their differences through mediation, emphasizing the ends of justice and restoration of peace.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR settlement agreement mediation Section 354 IPC