Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-9 v. IBILT Technologies Ltd.

12 Sep 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:5922-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that mere fall in profitability and absence of stock details do not justify rejection of books of account under Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act without proper verification and opportunity to the assessee.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 145(3) Income Tax Act rejection of books of account best judgment assessment fall in profitability

Virender Verma v. Neeraj Bajpai & Ors.

12 Sep 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:5919

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of respondents under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act due to lack of credible evidence and exclusion of testimony from closely associated witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(x) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 caste discrimination

Prem Arora & Ors v. Land Acquisition Collector (South-East) & Ors

12 Sep 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:5920-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation not paid, declaring the petitioners' land acquisition lapsed.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 possession

Indian Bank v. Gurcharan Singh and Ors.

12 Sep 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:5914

The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and held that interest compounded quarterly as per RBI guidelines merges into the principal and is recoverable, modifying the trial court's decree accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loan recovery compounded interest RBI guidelines acknowledgment of debt

Inderjot Singh and Associates Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.

11 Sep 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:9242

Delhi High Court directs DSIIDC to convert industrial sheds from leasehold to freehold upon deposit of conversion charges despite dispute with DDA over entitlement, holding charges pending final adjudication.

property petition_allowed Significant leasehold to freehold conversion conversion charges DSIIDC Delhi Development Authority

Amish Jain v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors

11 Sep 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:8360

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of defamation complaints against a bank's SARFAESI Act notice, holding that mere publication without evidence of reputational harm in the eyes of others does not constitute defamation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant defamation Section 499 IPC SARFAESI Act Non-Performing Assets

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-5 v. M/S Kaane Packaging Pvt. Ltd.

11 Sep 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:8306-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of income tax appeals involving tax effect below Rs. 50 lakhs without adjudicating substantial questions of law, condoning delay in filing.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Appeal Condonation of Delay Tax Effect Circular No. 3/2018

Shelly Oberoi v. State of NCT of Delhi

11 Sep 2018 · A. K. Pathak · 2018:DHC:8275

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a minor neighborly dispute following an amicable and voluntary settlement between the parties.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC minor criminal dispute

Saurabh & Ors. v. The State of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.

11 Sep 2018 · A.K. Pathak · 2018:DHC:8271

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under Sections 308/341/34 IPC following a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement voluntary settlement

Manuraj Hotels & Resorts Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. V K Yadav Karta

11 Sep 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:8259

The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple criminal miscellaneous petitions as withdrawn following an amicable settlement between the parties.

criminal petition_dismissed amicable settlement withdrawal of petitions dismissal as withdrawn criminal miscellaneous cases

H.B. Chaturvedi & Ors. v. Directorate of Enforcement (PMLA)

11 Sep 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:8252

The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn the pre-trial petitions filed by H.B. Chaturvedi and others challenging Enforcement Directorate proceedings under the PMLA, directing them to raise their contentions before the trial court after the summoning order.

criminal petition_dismissed Enforcement Directorate Prevention of Money Laundering Act PMLA summoning order

Karan Tamang v. Union of India

11 Sep 2018 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:5877-DB

The Delhi High Court held that selection through LDCE is a mode of promotion governed by Recruitment Rules 2010, quashing medical board orders that declared petitioners unfit under direct recruitment guidelines.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination LDCE promotion medical fitness

HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. YOGESH SINGH

11 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5868
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the compensation awarded to an injured victim in a motor accident case by reassessing loss of earning capacity and enhancing non-pecuniary damages, clarifying principles on future prospects and disability assessment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of future earning functional disability

Arvind Kumar Singh v. Pradeep Gupta

11 Sep 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:5839

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's rejection of discharge under Section 245 Cr.P.C. in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, holding that defences raised are to be tested at trial and a prima facie case was made out.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 245 Cr.P.C. discharge application security cheque

Kuldeep v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

11 Sep 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:5862

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their disputes through mediation and divorce.

criminal petition_allowed Section 498A IPC matrimonial discord quashing of FIR mediation

Mohd Sabeer @ Shabir Hussain v. Sh Shyam Babu Awasthi & Anr

11 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5865
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by correcting multiplier, increasing conveyance expenses, and awarding 9% interest, affirming insurer's liability despite discrepancies in accident timing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement loss of earning capacity multiplier

Mohd Sabeer @ Shabir Hussain v. Sh Shyam Babu Awasthi & Anr.

11 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5866
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation and interest in a motor accident claim, affirming reliance on unchallenged injured claimant's evidence and Income Tax Returns for income assessment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement loss of earning capacity multiplier

National Insurance Co Ltd. v. Vijay & Ors.

11 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5867

The Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation awards by applying the Supreme Court's future prospects guidelines and proportionately fixed insurer liability where a private vehicle was used commercially.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim future prospects compensation insurance liability

Parvinder v. State; Akash v. State

11 Sep 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:5857

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 392/34 IPC based on reliable complainant identification and corroborative recovery of stolen motorcycle, dismissing appeals challenging the prosecution's case.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery Section 392 IPC identification parade recovery of stolen property

Mohd Riyaz v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

11 Sep 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:5858
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 397 IPC holding that mere showing of a deadly weapon during robbery suffices for enhanced punishment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery Section 397 IPC deadly weapon brandishing weapon